'""""You're quite the giggle. No matter how the facts dispute your claims,
no matter how "off" your comparisons, you're still cheerleading for the
idiot who lied us into a war against an "enemy" that never attacked our
homeland, was not involved in 9-11, and had no WMDs.'''''"""



krause,,,

You would prefer to keep the leader in Iraq,, continue to allow him to
reward suicide bomber's families for their successful killing of as many
Americans as they can. Continue to kill on average 45,000 of his own people
every year,, siphon money from the oil for food, have 1% high high wealth
and 98 % poverty, who do not have access to the medicine or food.

krause,, what kind of a socialists are you???






"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Dave Hall wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:30:30 -0500, HarryKrause
wrote:


Dave Hall wrote:


No one said that this war would be easy or short. The fact that it's
still going on is not an indication of failure. We spent more time
rebuilding Germany and Japan after WWII.

THOSE are the facts.


Dave


After the Japanese and Germans surrendered, we did not lose more troops
than before we defeated their military.



Irrelevant. Each circumstance is different. This is a different kind
of war. But our objective is the same.

Dave

You're quite the giggle. No matter how the facts dispute your claims, no
matter how "off" your comparisons, you're still cheerleading for the idiot
who lied us into a war against an "enemy" that never attacked our
homeland, was not involved in 9-11, and had no WMDs.