wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.


*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones hoping for
bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all, aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?

JimH wrote:

*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones
hoping for
bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all, aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?

**************

That's a very poor guess.

"You guys" refers to people who endorse the principles and recommended
policies of the PNAC- a positon NOYB has taken in this forum several
times.

We're about one terrorist attack on the US away from a lot of moderates
joining the rabid right wingers in calling for an all-out, WWII, bring
back the draft, drop the nukes style obliteration of the middle east.
I'm convinced that radical reactionaries on the right are praying for
such an event every night.

The "first" modern Pearl Harbor, 9-11, didn't quite get the job done as
far as the PNAC is concerned, so if one is desirable ("what this
country needs") then two or more must be even better.

wrote in message
oups.com...
JimH wrote:

*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones
hoping for
bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all, aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?

**************

That's a very poor guess.

"You guys" refers to people who endorse the principles and recommended
policies of the PNAC- a positon NOYB has taken in this forum several
times.

We're about one terrorist attack on the US away from a lot of moderates
joining the rabid right wingers in calling for an all-out, WWII, bring
back the draft, drop the nukes style obliteration of the middle east.
I'm convinced that radical reactionaries on the right are praying for
such an event every night.

I'd like to see us do that *before* another attack on US soil...not
afterwards.




The "first" modern Pearl Harbor, 9-11, didn't quite get the job done as
far as the PNAC is concerned, so if one is desirable ("what this
country needs") then two or more must be even better.


If anything, it's the left that is hoping for another attack on US soil.
Then they can say "See! Bush's war on terror isn't working."

NOYB wrote:
If anything, it's the left that is hoping for another attack on US soil.

Really? I guess it's "the left" that has reaped enormous profits,
including outright theft of hundreds of millions of dollars along with
fraud, price gouging, etc etc.


Then they can say "See! Bush's war on terror isn't working."


Let's see... were more people killed by terrorists in 2002 or 2004? Are
numbers & fatalities of terrorist attacks going up or down?

Fact: President Bush's "war on terror" is not working.

DSK

"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
NOYB wrote:
If anything, it's the left that is hoping for another attack on US soil.

Really? I guess it's "the left" that has reaped enormous profits,
including outright theft of hundreds of millions of dollars along with
fraud, price gouging, etc etc.


Then they can say "See! Bush's war on terror isn't working."


Let's see... were more people killed by terrorists in 2002 or 2004? Are
numbers & fatalities of terrorist attacks going up or down?

Where?




Fact: President Bush's "war on terror" is not working.


That's an opinion again, Doug.

Let's see... were more people killed by terrorists in 2002 or 2004? Are
numbers & fatalities of terrorist attacks going up or down?


NOYB wrote:
Where?


Does it matter, if Americans are getting killed by terrorists?


Fact: President Bush's "war on terror" is not working.



That's an opinion again, Doug.


Well, it's an opinion that is backed by numbers in the the real world. I
guess in your opinion, that Bush/Cheney's "war on terror" is a success
despite evidence to the contrary?

Do you believe that water flows up hill, too?

DSK

On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 17:39:15 -0500, DSK wrote:

Let's see... were more people killed by terrorists in 2002 or 2004? Are
numbers & fatalities of terrorist attacks going up or down?


NOYB wrote:
Where?


Does it matter, if Americans are getting killed by terrorists?


Fact: President Bush's "war on terror" is not working.



That's an opinion again, Doug.


Well, it's an opinion that is backed by numbers in the the real world. I
guess in your opinion, that Bush/Cheney's "war on terror" is a success
despite evidence to the contrary?

Do you believe that water flows up hill, too?

DSK

It ain't over!


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On 7 Mar 2005 09:17:46 -0800, wrote:

JimH wrote:

*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones
hoping for
bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all, aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?

**************

That's a very poor guess.

"You guys" refers to people who endorse the principles and recommended
policies of the PNAC- a positon NOYB has taken in this forum several
times.

We're about one terrorist attack on the US away from a lot of moderates
joining the rabid right wingers in calling for an all-out, WWII, bring
back the draft, drop the nukes style obliteration of the middle east.
I'm convinced that radical reactionaries on the right are praying for
such an event every night.

The "first" modern Pearl Harbor, 9-11, didn't quite get the job done as
far as the PNAC is concerned, so if one is desirable ("what this
country needs") then two or more must be even better.

Chuck, I sure hope those considering initiating that attack have the same
realizations you do. Perhaps the idea of retaliatory destruction will make
someone think.

The idea that many Democrats are hoping for the worst is not confined to JimH.
It's all over TV.


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.


*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones hoping
for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all, aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?


I'm not sure what Chuck meant, but I can add something useful: Boys like
NOYB want something bad to happen because it means they'll see footage on TV
from cameras mounted on cruise missiles and stealth bombers, and he'll be
able to have sex again for a week or two afterward.

On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:42:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.


*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones hoping
for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all, aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?


I'm not sure what Chuck meant, but I can add something useful: Boys like
NOYB want something bad to happen because it means they'll see footage on TV
from cameras mounted on cruise missiles and stealth bombers, and he'll be
able to have sex again for a week or two afterward.


It's a shame I agreed to stopping personal insults.


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."