Gould,
Liberalism is not the greatest risk to your security, it is liberals. ; )


wrote in message
oups.com...
Jeff Rigby wrote:

Harry, we just had a Democrat try to run a woman off the road because
she
had a Bush 04 bumper sticker. He is now in jail and faces a possible 5

years in jail.

Statements like yours and many of your posts fuel this. STOP IT!

*****************

No, you just had a psychopath try to run a woman off the road.

We're running into a funny political party vs. criminal behavior
comparison in my state right now. The Republicans are trying to force
the Democratic governor out of office and have their lost-by-a-whisker
candidate installed instead. The big noise is about "convicted felons"
who voted in the election, with the implication that these convicted
felons must have all voted for the Democratic candidate and put her
over the top by virtue of their illegal votes. When the chicken
feathers settle, however, it seems that 900 of the approximately 1000
votes by convicted felons (out of over two-million ballots cast) are
from counties that went for the Republican candidate in the election.
An overwhelming majority of the convicted felons voting in the election
were men- a demographic group that voted heavily in favor of the
Republican candidate. There's a good chance that more of the "felon"
votes went to the Republican candidate than the Democrat as a result.
Several of the convicted felons tracked down by local media have
confirmed that they voted Republican in the governor's race.

All criminals aren't Democrats.

As far as Harry's contribution: Let's compare Harry Krause posting
anti-Bush items in a NG with about 20-30 regular readers vs the noise
your right wing idol's Hannity, Limbaugh, etc make every day for
40-million hypnotized listeners.

You think Harry does more damage reposting articles critical of the
Bush administration than statements like: "Liberals are the true
enemies of the United States and liberalism is the greatest risk to our
security?" Gimme a break. All the hate speech fuels this crap, from
both sides.

wrote in message
oups.com...
*********

.....that when confronted with uncomfortable facts or situations
certain people consider personal remarks and stereotypical denigrations
an appropriate response.


Yes, why do you find it neccessary to denigrade people?

Bert Robins asked:

Please define hate speech? Hate speech is protected by the 1st
amendment.

***************

You guys have the right to say hateful things, I have the right to
bitch about it. Swings both ways.

Gould,
Liberalism is not the greatest risk to your security, it is liberals.
; )


**************

Not according to President Bush.

According to President Bush, we are under attack by ultra conservative,
right wing religious fanatics.

Therefore, it is ultra conservatives and religious fanatics who present
the greatest threat. :-)

Democrats aren't criminals, we just like sex. ;-)
Fredo
"NOYB" wrote in message
.net...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On 10 Mar 2005 13:37:43 -0800, wrote:

Liberals are the true
enemies of the United States and liberalism is the greatest risk to
our
security?" Gimme a break. All the hate speech fuels this crap, from
both sides.


Now you're getting the idea.

*********

I'm proud *not* to be on the side that has turned hate speech into a
multi-billion dollar industry.

You listened to Byrd, Pelosi, or yourself lately? The bitterness over
losing
comes through quite strongly.


Barbara Boxer cried on the House floor over the loss.

On 10 Mar 2005 13:37:43 -0800, wrote:

Liberals are the true
enemies of the United States and liberalism is the greatest risk to
our
security?" Gimme a break. All the hate speech fuels this crap, from
both sides.


Now you're getting the idea.

*********

I'm proud *not* to be on the side that has turned hate speech into a
multi-billion dollar industry.

I'm still waiting for you to explain why this is "hate speech"?

It is simply an expression of the "other side". This goes back to my
earlier statement where the left views all criticism of their ideology
as "hate speech", while their comparing Bush to Hitler is perfectly
fine. Double standard hypocrisy.

There is a distinct grain of truth in the statement that liberalism is
the greatest threat to this country. Liberalism undoes the whole
framework by which this country was founded, and reduces it to the
lowest common denominator. In a society which gives greater
consideration to the rights terrorist prisoners or insurgents over the
brave soldiers who are fighting them, that is just plain wrong.

Yet many people obliviously go through their lives politically
ignorant to this threat, or they foolishly buy into the "compassion"
side of liberalism, without considering the ramifications to the other
side of the equation.

Dave

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:27:40 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On 10 Mar 2005 13:37:43 -0800, wrote:

Liberals are the true
enemies of the United States and liberalism is the greatest risk to
our
security?" Gimme a break. All the hate speech fuels this crap, from
both sides.


Now you're getting the idea.

*********

I'm proud *not* to be on the side that has turned hate speech into a
multi-billion dollar industry.

You listened to Byrd, Pelosi, or yourself lately? The bitterness over
losing
comes through quite strongly.


Barbara Boxer cried on the House floor over the loss.

I'm still waiting for Alec Baldwin and other more outspoken members of
the Hollyweird left to follow through with their threat to leave the
country......


Dave

On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 07:56:39 GMT, "FREDO" wrote:

Democrats aren't criminals, we just like sex. ;-)

With other prisoners?

Dave

On 10 Mar 2005 17:28:58 -0800, wrote:

Bert Robins asked:

Please define hate speech? Hate speech is protected by the 1st
amendment.

***************

You guys have the right to say hateful things, I have the right to
bitch about it. Swings both ways.

But you refuse to see your own slant and hypocrisy when you label
right wingers expressing their opinions about the left as "hate" while
upholding that your equal criticism of the right is simply an
"opposing opinion".

Dave

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On 10 Mar 2005 17:28:58 -0800, wrote:

Bert Robins asked:

Please define hate speech? Hate speech is protected by the 1st
amendment.

***************

You guys have the right to say hateful things, I have the right to
bitch about it. Swings both ways.

But you refuse to see your own slant and hypocrisy when you label
right wingers expressing their opinions about the left as "hate" while
upholding that your equal criticism of the right is simply an
"opposing opinion".

That is straight out of the liebral playbook



Dave