On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 22:35:18 -0500, DSK wrote:

John H wrote:
This is the best I could find on worthwhile Iraqi documents.

You mean the best looney-tunes ultra-right-wing fascist fantasy?

The grown-ups, like the DIA and the Duelfer report, all concluded very
very differently.

Feel free to believe that water runs up hill. The great thing about the
internet is that no matter messed up in the head you are, you can find
somebody on line that agrees with you.

DSK

Have you found something which shows how valuable and informative Saddam's '17
Volumes' were?

You and Chuck place them in such high regard, I'd think you could easily show
their worth.


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Feel free to believe that water runs up hill. The great thing about the
internet is that no matter messed up in the head you are, you can find
somebody on line that agrees with you.


John H wrote:
Have you found something which shows how valuable and informative Saddam's '17
Volumes' were?


The fact that no WMDs have been found, nor any facilities for producing
them... outside your's & NOBBY's fantasy world, I mean.

What I don't understand is why you continue to think that the Bush
Administration must be wrong when it admits that they were never there.
To be sure, they've been wrong about a lot of things, but the evidence
is pretty slim on this one.

DSK

On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 20:16:35 -0500, DSK wrote:

Feel free to believe that water runs up hill. The great thing about the
internet is that no matter messed up in the head you are, you can find
somebody on line that agrees with you.


John H wrote:
Have you found something which shows how valuable and informative Saddam's '17
Volumes' were?


The fact that no WMDs have been found, nor any facilities for producing
them... outside your's & NOBBY's fantasy world, I mean.

What I don't understand is why you continue to think that the Bush
Administration must be wrong when it admits that they were never there.
To be sure, they've been wrong about a lot of things, but the evidence
is pretty slim on this one.

DSK

The failure to find WMD has no more to do with Saddam's volumes than it does
with "Gone with the Wind".


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H wrote:
The failure to find WMD has no more to do with Saddam's volumes than it does
with "Gone with the Wind".


Great logic, there.

Documents said "No WMDs."

2 years of vigorous searching, and the expenditure of tens of millions
of dollars investigating, confirms the absence of WMDs.

It must be very difficult to cling to your wrong-headed opinions, I
congratulate you on not bowing to reality. Your pharmacist probably
appreciates your efforts too.

DSK

On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 21:10:44 -0500, DSK wrote:

John H wrote:
The failure to find WMD has no more to do with Saddam's volumes than it does
with "Gone with the Wind".


Great logic, there.

Documents said "No WMDs."

2 years of vigorous searching, and the expenditure of tens of millions
of dollars investigating, confirms the absence of WMDs.

It must be very difficult to cling to your wrong-headed opinions, I
congratulate you on not bowing to reality. Your pharmacist probably
appreciates your efforts too.

DSK

The documents said nothing worthwhile, else why would UNMOVIC have continued
asking the Iraqis for documentation (which they never got)?

Keep searching for something to show the documents presented anything of
substance. There wasn't even enough there to be called a lie.


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."