wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ps.com...

John H wrote:
On 2 Mar 2005 12:03:46 -0800, wrote:


I wonder if you'll ever be man enough to quit acting like a
spoiled
little ****ing child. What a pathetic crumb of **** you are.


basskisser, a while back this post was made:
************************************************** ******
On 2 Mar 2005 06:54:20 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:

Here we go again. B'assikisser, it *was* kind of nice not
having
you
around for
a while.

Some find it nice when YOU aren't around.

John, a few simple questions for you. Do you find it
acceptable
to
knowingly post lies about other people? Do you think someone
who
does
so should be thought of as a person of integrity? Do you
think
that
someone who does this does so possibly because they've failed
in
life,
and need to bolster their ego? Do you think that a person
would
do
such
things should should be taken seriously? Do you further think
that
someone who has strange, untrue, unfactual ideas just pop
into
their
head (ie: thinking I beat my wife), as mentally stable?

Is this like the SAT?

basskisser, you're simply making your hole bigger. If you
don't
want
to read the
comments written by others, then *kill file* them. That's how
easy it
is!

In answers to your questions (in order of the questions): No,
so
I
don't do it,
and I'm not sure that others do, unless they are making a
statement
on a subject
about which I am knowledgeable. No, if they *knowingly* told a
lie.
No, I don't
believe that lying is an indication of life failure or ego
bolstering. I believe
that lying will be detrimental to a person's ego. No, I don't
think
liars should
be taken seriously (you should know this by now!). I don't
think
a
super
imagination is an indicator of a lack of mental stability.

Now. No one has said you beat your wife,

Hmm, so you think, that if someone asks "do you STILL beat your
wife",
that that wouldn't conotate a lie???? Now, notice, John, he
didn't
ask
IF I had ever beat my wife. If he had, I would have answered.
But,
being how Fritz isn't very bright, he IMPLICATED me, which is a
total
lie. Do you condone that behavior? Do you think someone who
would
implicate me in a total fabrication would have integrity?

nor smoke pot,
Not true. Jim has, several times. Go look. Fritz even accused
me
of
smoking pot with my kids. Go look again. Jim has accused me of
growing
pot, of growing pot with my kids' knowledge, of buying seeds on
the
internet, of having a "crop" of pot, and on and on. All lies.


http://tinyurl.com/6kllf

And that Heaven's Stairway site is located he
http://www.hempqc.com/

So how good of crop did you have last year?

Have you noticed how disjointed asslicker's thought pattern has
been?

His FAS much be kicking in again. Too bad the week of detoxic
didn't do
any good, since he admited he has not stopped smoking dope or
stopped

drinking.


You need to learn to read, you idiot! Please show where I "admitted
(I)
have not stopped smoking dope or stopped drinking". What a dumb
****
you truly are.

So you again admit you have not stopped smoking dope or drinking.
Thanks
for the clarification.

Boy, you ARE stupid!!!! And a liar.


Amazing. Just when I thought I saw it all from you.


How's the wife and boat?

Fine. Thanks for asking.

"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ps.com...

John H wrote:
On 2 Mar 2005 12:03:46 -0800, wrote:


I wonder if you'll ever be man enough to quit acting like a
spoiled
little ****ing child. What a pathetic crumb of **** you are.


basskisser, a while back this post was made:
************************************************** ******
On 2 Mar 2005 06:54:20 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:

Here we go again. B'assikisser, it *was* kind of nice not
having
you
around for
a while.

Some find it nice when YOU aren't around.

John, a few simple questions for you. Do you find it
acceptable
to
knowingly post lies about other people? Do you think someone
who
does
so should be thought of as a person of integrity? Do you
think
that
someone who does this does so possibly because they've failed
in
life,
and need to bolster their ego? Do you think that a person
would
do
such
things should should be taken seriously? Do you further think
that
someone who has strange, untrue, unfactual ideas just pop
into
their
head (ie: thinking I beat my wife), as mentally stable?

Is this like the SAT?

basskisser, you're simply making your hole bigger. If you
don't
want
to read the
comments written by others, then *kill file* them. That's how
easy it
is!

In answers to your questions (in order of the questions): No,
so
I
don't do it,
and I'm not sure that others do, unless they are making a
statement
on a subject
about which I am knowledgeable. No, if they *knowingly* told a
lie.
No, I don't
believe that lying is an indication of life failure or ego
bolstering. I believe
that lying will be detrimental to a person's ego. No, I don't
think
liars should
be taken seriously (you should know this by now!). I don't
think
a
super
imagination is an indicator of a lack of mental stability.

Now. No one has said you beat your wife,

Hmm, so you think, that if someone asks "do you STILL beat your
wife",
that that wouldn't conotate a lie???? Now, notice, John, he
didn't
ask
IF I had ever beat my wife. If he had, I would have answered.
But,
being how Fritz isn't very bright, he IMPLICATED me, which is a
total
lie. Do you condone that behavior? Do you think someone who
would
implicate me in a total fabrication would have integrity?

nor smoke pot,
Not true. Jim has, several times. Go look. Fritz even accused
me
of
smoking pot with my kids. Go look again. Jim has accused me of
growing
pot, of growing pot with my kids' knowledge, of buying seeds on
the
internet, of having a "crop" of pot, and on and on. All lies.


http://tinyurl.com/6kllf

And that Heaven's Stairway site is located he
http://www.hempqc.com/

So how good of crop did you have last year?

Have you noticed how disjointed asslicker's thought pattern has
been?

His FAS much be kicking in again. Too bad the week of detoxic
didn't do
any good, since he admited he has not stopped smoking dope or
stopped

drinking.


You need to learn to read, you idiot! Please show where I "admitted
(I)
have not stopped smoking dope or stopped drinking". What a dumb
****
you truly are.

So you again admit you have not stopped smoking dope or drinking.
Thanks
for the clarification.

Boy, you ARE stupid!!!! And a liar.


Amazing. Just when I thought I saw it all from you.

He is running away from the competition with his title of "King of the NG
idiots"



How's the wife and boat?

Fine. Thanks for asking.

"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ps.com...

John H wrote:
On 2 Mar 2005 12:03:46 -0800, wrote:


I wonder if you'll ever be man enough to quit acting like a
spoiled
little ****ing child. What a pathetic crumb of **** you are.


basskisser, a while back this post was made:
************************************************** ******
On 2 Mar 2005 06:54:20 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:

Here we go again. B'assikisser, it *was* kind of nice not
having
you
around for
a while.

Some find it nice when YOU aren't around.

John, a few simple questions for you. Do you find it acceptable
to
knowingly post lies about other people? Do you think someone who
does
so should be thought of as a person of integrity? Do you think
that
someone who does this does so possibly because they've failed in
life,
and need to bolster their ego? Do you think that a person would
do
such
things should should be taken seriously? Do you further think
that
someone who has strange, untrue, unfactual ideas just pop into
their
head (ie: thinking I beat my wife), as mentally stable?

Is this like the SAT?

basskisser, you're simply making your hole bigger. If you don't
want
to read the
comments written by others, then *kill file* them. That's how
easy it
is!

In answers to your questions (in order of the questions): No, so
I
don't do it,
and I'm not sure that others do, unless they are making a
statement
on a subject
about which I am knowledgeable. No, if they *knowingly* told a
lie.
No, I don't
believe that lying is an indication of life failure or ego
bolstering. I believe
that lying will be detrimental to a person's ego. No, I don't
think
liars should
be taken seriously (you should know this by now!). I don't think
a
super
imagination is an indicator of a lack of mental stability.

Now. No one has said you beat your wife,

Hmm, so you think, that if someone asks "do you STILL beat your
wife",
that that wouldn't conotate a lie???? Now, notice, John, he didn't
ask
IF I had ever beat my wife. If he had, I would have answered. But,
being how Fritz isn't very bright, he IMPLICATED me, which is a
total
lie. Do you condone that behavior? Do you think someone who would
implicate me in a total fabrication would have integrity?

nor smoke pot,
Not true. Jim has, several times. Go look. Fritz even accused me
of
smoking pot with my kids. Go look again. Jim has accused me of
growing
pot, of growing pot with my kids' knowledge, of buying seeds on
the
internet, of having a "crop" of pot, and on and on. All lies.


http://tinyurl.com/6kllf

And that Heaven's Stairway site is located he
http://www.hempqc.com/

So how good of crop did you have last year?

Have you noticed how disjointed asslicker's thought pattern has been?

His FAS much be kicking in again. Too bad the week of detoxic
didn't do
any good, since he admited he has not stopped smoking dope or stopped

drinking.


You need to learn to read, you idiot! Please show where I "admitted (I)
have not stopped smoking dope or stopped drinking". What a dumb ****
you truly are.

So you again admit you have not stopped smoking dope or drinking. Thanks
for the clarification.

LMAO........you'd think he would eventually get tired of getting hooked on
that dough ball bait.............guess his two brain cells are too fogged by
the dope and alcohol.

On 3 Mar 2005 11:23:00 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 3 Mar 2005 09:24:22 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:


Again, I see that you apparently don't understand "implication".
It
is
a lawfully binding statement, so, that in turn means that those
three
are nothing short of liars.

An 'implication' is a lawfully binding statement? Where did that come
from? Do
you mean to tell me that my 'nose-picking' question is somehow
'lawfully
binding'? How? To what am I bound?

You can be implicated of a crime and thus convicted of a crime, PURELY
by implication, in just about any court in the U.S. Read this:
http://www.crimeweek.com/cja/0603preponderance.html (a preponderance of
implication)
Now, from the U.C.M.J. Article 79: (1) In general. A lesser offense is
included in a charged offense when the specification contains
alle;gations which either expressly or by fair implication put the
accused on notice to be prepared to defend against it ......
Here's one from Missouri, a case of guilt by implication:
http://www.courts.mo.gov/SUP/index.nsf/0/81efeb4984c10c9d86256c62007e99ae/$FILE/SC84581%20Bahrenburg's%20brief.PDF
From Kobe Bryant's trial, a ruling by a judge on IMPLIED GUILT: The
woman who has accused Kobe Bryant of rape can not be referred to at
trial as a "victim," according to a ruling by the Colorado judge
overseeing the NBA star's criminal case. In the below decision,
District Judge Terry Ruckriegle sided with Bryant's attorneys, who
argued that the term implied guilt on the 25-year-old athlete's part
and essentially robbed him of the presumption of innocence.

So, you see, you can be guilty, in a court of law, purely by
implication.

Main Entry: im·pli·ca·tion
Pronunciation: "im-pl&-'kA-sh&n
Function: noun
1 a : the act of implicating : the state of being implicated b : close
connection; especially : an incriminating involvement
2 a : the act of implying : the state of being implied b (1) : a logical
relation between two propositions that fails to hold only if the first is true
and the second is false (2) : a logical relationship between two propositions in
which if the first is true the second is true (3) : a statement exhibiting a
relation of implication
3 : something implied : as a : SUGGESTION b : a possible significance the book
has political implications

So you feel that the question, "Have you stopped beating your wife?" implicates
you or indicates an incriminating involvement in the beating of your wife?

Could, perhaps, the third definition above be more applicable?

I think so. I sincerely doubt if a court would find you guilty or even involved
in the beating of your wife simply because someone asked you the question.

Furthermore, I don't think a court would find you guilty of growing marijuana in
your back yard simply because someone asked how your crop was doing.

After reviewing your references, I conclude you are using the word 'implication'
erroneously. In the first case, a great deal of evidence implicated the
defendant. In the second, an allegation was made, the defendant pleaded guilty
and was punished.

In your case, implications were made in the form of definition 2, above. If
neither of the propositions is true, then the implication is false.

So, I don't think you need to worry about going to jail based 'solely' on the
questions (or implications) made by P. Fritz, et al.

Now, stop worrying and enjoy your day!


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H wrote:
On 3 Mar 2005 11:23:00 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 3 Mar 2005 09:24:22 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:


Again, I see that you apparently don't understand
"implication".
It
is
a lawfully binding statement, so, that in turn means that
those
three
are nothing short of liars.

An 'implication' is a lawfully binding statement? Where did that
come
from? Do
you mean to tell me that my 'nose-picking' question is somehow
'lawfully
binding'? How? To what am I bound?

You can be implicated of a crime and thus convicted of a crime,
PURELY
by implication, in just about any court in the U.S. Read this:
http://www.crimeweek.com/cja/0603preponderance.html (a preponderance
of
implication)
Now, from the U.C.M.J. Article 79: (1) In general. A lesser offense
is
included in a charged offense when the specification contains
alle;gations which either expressly or by fair implication put the
accused on notice to be prepared to defend against it ......
Here's one from Missouri, a case of guilt by implication:

http://www.courts.mo.gov/SUP/index.n...6c62007e99ae/=
$FILE/SC84581%20Bahrenburg's%20brief.PDF
From Kobe Bryant's trial, a ruling by a judge on IMPLIED GUILT: The
woman who has accused Kobe Bryant of rape can not be referred to at
trial as a "victim," according to a ruling by the Colorado judge
overseeing the NBA star's criminal case. In the below decision,
District Judge Terry Ruckriegle sided with Bryant's attorneys, who
argued that the term implied guilt on the 25-year-old athlete's part
and essentially robbed him of the presumption of innocence.

So, you see, you can be guilty, in a court of law, purely by
implication.

Main Entry: im=B7pli=B7ca=B7tion
Pronunciation: "im-pl&-'kA-sh&n
Function: noun
1 a : the act of implicating : the state of being implicated b :
close
connection; especially : an incriminating involvement
2 a : the act of implying : the state of being implied b (1) : a
logical
relation between two propositions that fails to hold only if the
first is true
and the second is false (2) : a logical relationship between two
propositions in
which if the first is true the second is true (3) : a statement
exhibiting a
relation of implication
3 : something implied : as a : SUGGESTION b : a possible significance
the book
has political implications

So you feel that the question, "Have you stopped beating your wife?"
implicates
you or indicates an incriminating involvement in the beating of your
wife?

Could, perhaps, the third definition above be more applicable?

I think so. I sincerely doubt if a court would find you guilty or
even involved
in the beating of your wife simply because someone asked you the
question.

Oh, but alas, you STILL don't understand the qualifier Fritz used:
STILL. Now, what in the WORLD would that IMPLY to you? Now, I never
said that a court could convict me on anything that Fritz said. You
aren't grasping things here, John. I am conveying to you that
implication IS strong enough to be used in all of the courts, thus, he
IS a liar.

Furthermore, I don't think a court would find you guilty of growing
marijuana in
your back yard simply because someone asked how your crop was doing.

Same response, read above.

After reviewing your references, I conclude you are using the word
'implication'
erroneously. In the first case, a great deal of evidence implicated
the
defendant. In the second, an allegation was made, the defendant
pleaded guilty
and was punished.

In your case, implications were made in the form of definition 2,
above. If
neither of the propositions is true, then the implication is false.

So, I don't think you need to worry about going to jail based
'solely' on the
questions (or implications) made by P. Fritz, et al.

Again, I never, ever said I was worried about "going to jail based on
the implications made by Fritz. You are running off on a different
tangent again. What does that to you? Booze? I am again, conveying to
you that an implication can be a LIE. You said so yourself, if neither
proposition is true, then the implication is false, ie: a low class
lie.

Now, stop worrying and enjoy your day!

Why do you think I am "worrying"? Those three buffoons are the least of
my worries.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Fritz is an idiot. You know it, I know it, and everyone else knows it.
He has no redeeming value here. So...why not just put him in your bozo
bin and be done with the fool? Let him rant on. The only posters other
than you who pay any attention to him are the usual Peanut Gallery
suspects anyway. Hell, I've dumped almost all of them. Try it...you'll
like it.


Maybe you should listen to Harry, basskisser.

If not, he may turn on you and make your life a living hell here.
Don't you remember the verbal bitch-slapping you received from him in the
"how to remove a steering wheel" thread?

P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ps.com...

John H wrote:
On 2 Mar 2005 12:03:46 -0800, wrote:


I wonder if you'll ever be man enough to quit acting like a
spoiled
little ****ing child. What a pathetic crumb of **** you are.


basskisser, a while back this post was made:
************************************************** ******
On 2 Mar 2005 06:54:20 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:

Here we go again. B'assikisser, it *was* kind of nice not
having
you
around for
a while.

Some find it nice when YOU aren't around.

John, a few simple questions for you. Do you find it
acceptable
to
knowingly post lies about other people? Do you think someone
who
does
so should be thought of as a person of integrity? Do you
think
that
someone who does this does so possibly because they've
failed in
life,
and need to bolster their ego? Do you think that a person
would
do
such
things should should be taken seriously? Do you further
think
that
someone who has strange, untrue, unfactual ideas just pop
into
their
head (ie: thinking I beat my wife), as mentally stable?

Is this like the SAT?

basskisser, you're simply making your hole bigger. If you
don't
want
to read the
comments written by others, then *kill file* them. That's how
easy it
is!

In answers to your questions (in order of the questions): No,
so
I
don't do it,
and I'm not sure that others do, unless they are making a
statement
on a subject
about which I am knowledgeable. No, if they *knowingly* told
a
lie.
No, I don't
believe that lying is an indication of life failure or ego
bolstering. I believe
that lying will be detrimental to a person's ego. No, I don't
think
liars should
be taken seriously (you should know this by now!). I don't
think
a
super
imagination is an indicator of a lack of mental stability.

Now. No one has said you beat your wife,

Hmm, so you think, that if someone asks "do you STILL beat
your
wife",
that that wouldn't conotate a lie???? Now, notice, John, he
didn't
ask
IF I had ever beat my wife. If he had, I would have answered.
But,
being how Fritz isn't very bright, he IMPLICATED me, which is
a
total
lie. Do you condone that behavior? Do you think someone who
would
implicate me in a total fabrication would have integrity?

nor smoke pot,
Not true. Jim has, several times. Go look. Fritz even accused
me
of
smoking pot with my kids. Go look again. Jim has accused me of
growing
pot, of growing pot with my kids' knowledge, of buying seeds
on
the
internet, of having a "crop" of pot, and on and on. All lies.


http://tinyurl.com/6kllf

And that Heaven's Stairway site is located he
http://www.hempqc.com/

So how good of crop did you have last year?

Have you noticed how disjointed asslicker's thought pattern has
been?

His FAS much be kicking in again. Too bad the week of detoxic
didn't do
any good, since he admited he has not stopped smoking dope or
stopped

drinking.


You need to learn to read, you idiot! Please show where I
"admitted (I)
have not stopped smoking dope or stopped drinking". What a dumb
****
you truly are.

So you again admit you have not stopped smoking dope or drinking.
Thanks
for the clarification.

LMAO........you'd think he would eventually get tired of getting
hooked on
that dough ball bait.............guess his two brain cells are too
fogged by
the dope and alcohol.

My god you are dumb. Go back to your online support groups and get some
help. Did you go to the sites for chronic liars that I posted?

On 3 Mar 2005 12:40:35 -0800, wrote:




Why do you think I am "worrying"? Those three buffoons are the least of
my worries.

Go back to your posts of the previous hour in which you 'implied' several things
about one of the individuals who has made implications about you.

Notice his response to the ridiculous implications you made...none.

Did he start asking you for proof? Did he start calling you 'capital letter'
names? Did he act as though he was totally bent out of shape? No.

Take a lesson from that. Can you not see that you are biting at any bait put in
front of you? It is laughable.


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On 3 Mar 2005 12:41:41 -0800, wrote:


P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ps.com...

John H wrote:
On 2 Mar 2005 12:03:46 -0800, wrote:


I wonder if you'll ever be man enough to quit acting like a
spoiled
little ****ing child. What a pathetic crumb of **** you are.


basskisser, a while back this post was made:
************************************************** ******
On 2 Mar 2005 06:54:20 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:

Here we go again. B'assikisser, it *was* kind of nice not
having
you
around for
a while.

Some find it nice when YOU aren't around.

John, a few simple questions for you. Do you find it
acceptable
to
knowingly post lies about other people? Do you think someone
who
does
so should be thought of as a person of integrity? Do you
think
that
someone who does this does so possibly because they've
failed in
life,
and need to bolster their ego? Do you think that a person
would
do
such
things should should be taken seriously? Do you further
think
that
someone who has strange, untrue, unfactual ideas just pop
into
their
head (ie: thinking I beat my wife), as mentally stable?

Is this like the SAT?

basskisser, you're simply making your hole bigger. If you
don't
want
to read the
comments written by others, then *kill file* them. That's how
easy it
is!

In answers to your questions (in order of the questions): No,
so
I
don't do it,
and I'm not sure that others do, unless they are making a
statement
on a subject
about which I am knowledgeable. No, if they *knowingly* told
a
lie.
No, I don't
believe that lying is an indication of life failure or ego
bolstering. I believe
that lying will be detrimental to a person's ego. No, I don't
think
liars should
be taken seriously (you should know this by now!). I don't
think
a
super
imagination is an indicator of a lack of mental stability.

Now. No one has said you beat your wife,

Hmm, so you think, that if someone asks "do you STILL beat
your
wife",
that that wouldn't conotate a lie???? Now, notice, John, he
didn't
ask
IF I had ever beat my wife. If he had, I would have answered.
But,
being how Fritz isn't very bright, he IMPLICATED me, which is
a
total
lie. Do you condone that behavior? Do you think someone who
would
implicate me in a total fabrication would have integrity?

nor smoke pot,
Not true. Jim has, several times. Go look. Fritz even accused
me
of
smoking pot with my kids. Go look again. Jim has accused me of
growing
pot, of growing pot with my kids' knowledge, of buying seeds
on
the
internet, of having a "crop" of pot, and on and on. All lies.


http://tinyurl.com/6kllf

And that Heaven's Stairway site is located he
http://www.hempqc.com/

So how good of crop did you have last year?

Have you noticed how disjointed asslicker's thought pattern has
been?

His FAS much be kicking in again. Too bad the week of detoxic
didn't do
any good, since he admited he has not stopped smoking dope or
stopped

drinking.


You need to learn to read, you idiot! Please show where I
"admitted (I)
have not stopped smoking dope or stopped drinking". What a dumb
****
you truly are.

So you again admit you have not stopped smoking dope or drinking.
Thanks
for the clarification.

LMAO........you'd think he would eventually get tired of getting
hooked on
that dough ball bait.............guess his two brain cells are too
fogged by
the dope and alcohol.

My god you are dumb. Go back to your online support groups and get some
help. Did you go to the sites for chronic liars that I posted?

Hooked again!


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 20:41:36 GMT, "Joe" wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Fritz is an idiot. You know it, I know it, and everyone else knows it.
He has no redeeming value here. So...why not just put him in your bozo
bin and be done with the fool? Let him rant on. The only posters other
than you who pay any attention to him are the usual Peanut Gallery
suspects anyway. Hell, I've dumped almost all of them. Try it...you'll
like it.


Maybe you should listen to Harry, basskisser.

If not, he may turn on you and make your life a living hell here.
Don't you remember the verbal bitch-slapping you received from him in the
"how to remove a steering wheel" thread?


Yup. You'd better listen to Harry, basskisser. I don't agree with his
name-calling, but he's giving you good advice.

You must be becoming an embarrassment to him as you both have the same ideology.


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."