Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "K Smith" wrote in message ... Ok so it seems the basics from thread No 1 have been accepted without challenge?? Somewhat begrudgingly I might say, but hey this is rec.boats if it were easy it would be too crowded:-) So now you've all thrown your various sexist hissy fits, none of which addressed any of the thread's issues:-) but were more about silencing me, which isn't going to happen:-) maybe this time you can either comment directly on the substance of the material of just stay quiet, very very quiet??? (please) snip (1) The design of petrol engines is dependent on the fuel burning within the closed combustion chamber in a consistently predicable way, with the accepted target in petrol engines to; (a) To have the fuel ignition instigated by the spark plug & only the spark plug ok (b) To have the flamefront propagate at a known speed/time, reliable throughout the charge, that speed varies with temp/pressure so it varies as the burn proceeds, starts slow then speeds up as the chamber temp /pressure rises. This is just the way things are, right? (c) So as the temp/pressure combo in the chamber rises, the extremities of the charge do not reach their autoignition temp, before the accelerating flamefront has arrived as intended. no detonation. (c) To have the burn all but completed & the highest chamber pressure occur just at or just after the piston leaves TDC on the power stroke. I don't know about this one. It is for sure you don't want it before tdc. but I don't know that you want it too near after tdc either. The pursuit of this target over a variety of conditions involves juggling many variables, including; That's why the engine designers make the big bucks. (2) the octane rating of the intended petrol including anything that may dilute/contaminate it (whole books exist just on this fuel/octane subject so this is very much in a nutshell, however comments are very much valued), (a) A lazy way to describe this is the higher the octane rating of the fuel the higher the temp it autoignites at & usually the slower the flamefront will propagate. Or the lower the octane rating the lower the autoignition temp will be & the faster the flamefront will propagate (flashover, remember the flamefront speed varies as the chamber's temp/pressure varies)). yep, definition of octane snip (c) Old worn engines & new 2 stroke OBs allow lube oil into the combustion chamber, this has the effect of reducing the fuels octane rating, again the design has to be aware of & allow for this effect. Over years this has been recognised as a reliability issue in 2 stroke OBs, so some effort has gone into reducing the amounts of oil carried up into the chamber. (d) So for the burn to be predictable & consistently controlled over the full range of operating conditions the actual octane rating arriving within the chamber needs to be as close to the raw fuels rating as possible with as little oil dilution as possible. Or the engine has to be designed to cope with the known effects of oil in the gas. (3) Some side comments?? The DFIs you'd think have solved this octane dilution problem by not having oil mixed in the fuel?? not so, what they do do is; snip (d) The very small amounts of oil stay in the crankcase & get hotter & hotter & hotter, (e) At lower revs there isn't enough air flowing through the crankcase to carry any excess oil up the transfer ports & out the at low revs overlapping exhaust, this is a deliberate "must pass the EPA test" tactic & it works in stopping raw oil getting out at low revs. It is not clear it is an EPA thing, or just the way things are. I don't even know if it is really true. (f) So at low revs the DFI has virtually no oil getting into the chamber & the fuels octane rating (resistance to autoignition, flamefront speed(s))) is as placarded however, (g) When the engine is powered up any excess built up crankcase oil can escape, but by now the useful overlap between the transfer & exhaust ports is diminished (again as intended by the design) so the oil can get into the chamber & dilute the fuel's octane rating. (h) The thing to be considered is that at low revs the oil isn't being transfered & burnt at all, so at low to moderate revs the octane rating of the fuel is "safe", but as the revs rise oil definitely (what?? 1 ltr ever 12 hrs running??) does get burnt, but because it's no longer consistently mixed in fuel it goes up in fits & spirts, some not a risk, others definitely a big risk of severely dilluting the fuels octane rating. This is an interesting theory. You've abandoned the hot piston causes detonation theory? Or is this complimentary? I hope this gets some genuine substantive review & thanks in advance to anyone who bothers. I'm sure lots will just say it's No 2's:-) with no actual rejoinders on the issues. Substantive review? wrong kind of engineer K |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why Ficht failed no1 | General | |||
2 or 4 stroke? | General |