John H wrote:

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:29:32 GMT, "Jim," wrote:


JimH wrote:


Well in the strict definition of the word mess -- Iraq is a mess because
the US bombed most of the infrastructure all to hell.


Bull****. In almost every case the infrastructure is better than before the war
started.


In the mode I intended it, Iraq is a mess because we have accomplished
little, at a loss of 1500 lives, Billions of Dollars, infinite loss of
respect from both the countries of the middle east, and out former
allies in Europe.


Bull****. Most of the world would agree that the changes to the mideast amount
to a very significant accomplishment.


As for Osama -- he was declared to be our primary target following 9/11.
It's been well over 3 years and we haven't got him -- probably because
of the distraction of Iraq.


More bull****. It took the police and FBI twenty plus years to catch the BTK
killer in Wichita. What the hell are you folks going to bitch about when Osama
*is* caught? Ninety percent of your whining rationale will be gone.


Do *YOU* think Iraq is a well ordered, well run place you might like to
vacation to?


I suppose it would be better off if the Iraqis were getting killed and dumped at
the rate of 30,000 =/- per year?

Would you like to vacation in Kosovo?

Jimcomma, you lost the election. Your whines and rants do nothing to serve your
liberal interests.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes


Here is the DRAFT of an OFFICIAL report John -- Suggest you read what
our own Center for Strategic and International studies has to say.

http://www.sftt.org/PDF/article01042005a.pdf

Chapter 1 Failures in recognizing the growth and character of the
insurgent threat

Chapter 2 Evolving threat tactics and pressure on government forces

Chapter 3 The evolving nature of the insurgency

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:57:39 -0500, "JimH" wrote:

Jimcomma wrote that John, not me.


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:29:32 GMT, "Jim," wrote:

JimH wrote:

Well in the strict definition of the word mess -- Iraq is a mess because
the US bombed most of the infrastructure all to hell.

Bull****. In almost every case the infrastructure is better than before
the war
started.

In the mode I intended it, Iraq is a mess because we have accomplished
little, at a loss of 1500 lives, Billions of Dollars, infinite loss of
respect from both the countries of the middle east, and out former
allies in Europe.

Bull****. Most of the world would agree that the changes to the mideast
amount
to a very significant accomplishment.

As for Osama -- he was declared to be our primary target following 9/11.
It's been well over 3 years and we haven't got him -- probably because
of the distraction of Iraq.

More bull****. It took the police and FBI twenty plus years to catch the
BTK
killer in Wichita. What the hell are you folks going to bitch about when
Osama
*is* caught? Ninety percent of your whining rationale will be gone.

Do *YOU* think Iraq is a well ordered, well run place you might like to
vacation to?

I suppose it would be better off if the Iraqis were getting killed and
dumped at
the rate of 30,000 =/- per year?

Would you like to vacation in Kosovo?

Jimcomma, you lost the election. Your whines and rants do nothing to serve
your
liberal interests.


I *said* 'Jimcomma'! See the line just above. Hell, I'm not so senile I can't
recognize the difference between your posts and Jimcomma's.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:45:53 GMT, "Jim," wrote:

John H wrote:

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:29:32 GMT, "Jim," wrote:


JimH wrote:


Well in the strict definition of the word mess -- Iraq is a mess because
the US bombed most of the infrastructure all to hell.


Bull****. In almost every case the infrastructure is better than before the war
started.


In the mode I intended it, Iraq is a mess because we have accomplished
little, at a loss of 1500 lives, Billions of Dollars, infinite loss of
respect from both the countries of the middle east, and out former
allies in Europe.


Bull****. Most of the world would agree that the changes to the mideast amount
to a very significant accomplishment.


As for Osama -- he was declared to be our primary target following 9/11.
It's been well over 3 years and we haven't got him -- probably because
of the distraction of Iraq.


More bull****. It took the police and FBI twenty plus years to catch the BTK
killer in Wichita. What the hell are you folks going to bitch about when Osama
*is* caught? Ninety percent of your whining rationale will be gone.


Do *YOU* think Iraq is a well ordered, well run place you might like to
vacation to?


I suppose it would be better off if the Iraqis were getting killed and dumped at
the rate of 30,000 =/- per year?

Would you like to vacation in Kosovo?

Jimcomma, you lost the election. Your whines and rants do nothing to serve your
liberal interests.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes


Here is the DRAFT of an OFFICIAL report John -- Suggest you read what
our own Center for Strategic and International studies has to say.

http://www.sftt.org/PDF/article01042005a.pdf

Chapter 1 Failures in recognizing the growth and character of the
insurgent threat

Chapter 2 Evolving threat tactics and pressure on government forces

Chapter 3 The evolving nature of the insurgency

Were mistakes made? Yes. Could we have done better at recognizing the insurgent
threat? Yes.

Are the Iraqis better off now than under Saddam? Yes. Have major changes
occurred in the political processes of Afghanistan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia,
Palestine, Lebanon, Libya, and, most recently, Syria? Yes.

So you keep up your whining if it makes you feel better. Please note the *past
tense* used throughout your cited report.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:05:00 GMT, "Jim," wrote:

John H wrote:

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:31:38 GMT, "Jim," wrote:

snipped

YOU WANT TO GO AROUND AGAIN?!?!?!?!? NO, I won't play your silly game!
Try reading the thread again -- maybe slower so you might comprehend
something


The fact is that the US economy is the envy of most of the world. Bush did it.

Stop whining.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

Mum John -- don't forget that "Most of the world" is holding US debt.

As to their opinion of Bush, there's a cartoon in todays paper --
showing bush getting back from his "successful" trip to Europe. He is
saying something to the effect that he sure impressed them, but he has a
bunch of "Kick Me" stickers on his back.

Well, I'd sure rather they be holding ours than us be holding theirs.

If you'd listened to Sen. Biden on Meet The Press today, you'd realize that
Bush's trip was a resounding success!

You're spending too much time on the SciFi channel or in rec.boats.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

John H wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:45:53 GMT, "Jim," wrote:


John H wrote:


On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:29:32 GMT, "Jim," wrote:



JimH wrote:


Well in the strict definition of the word mess -- Iraq is a mess because
the US bombed most of the infrastructure all to hell.


Bull****. In almost every case the infrastructure is better than before the war
started.



In the mode I intended it, Iraq is a mess because we have accomplished
little, at a loss of 1500 lives, Billions of Dollars, infinite loss of
respect from both the countries of the middle east, and out former
allies in Europe.


Bull****. Most of the world would agree that the changes to the mideast amount
to a very significant accomplishment.



As for Osama -- he was declared to be our primary target following 9/11.
It's been well over 3 years and we haven't got him -- probably because
of the distraction of Iraq.


More bull****. It took the police and FBI twenty plus years to catch the BTK
killer in Wichita. What the hell are you folks going to bitch about when Osama
*is* caught? Ninety percent of your whining rationale will be gone.



Do *YOU* think Iraq is a well ordered, well run place you might like to
vacation to?


I suppose it would be better off if the Iraqis were getting killed and dumped at
the rate of 30,000 =/- per year?

Would you like to vacation in Kosovo?

Jimcomma, you lost the election. Your whines and rants do nothing to serve your
liberal interests.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes


Here is the DRAFT of an OFFICIAL report John -- Suggest you read what
our own Center for Strategic and International studies has to say.

http://www.sftt.org/PDF/article01042005a.pdf

Chapter 1 Failures in recognizing the growth and character of the
insurgent threat

Chapter 2 Evolving threat tactics and pressure on government forces

Chapter 3 The evolving nature of the insurgency


Were mistakes made? Yes. Could we have done better at recognizing the insurgent
threat? Yes.

Are the Iraqis better off now than under Saddam? Yes. Have major changes
occurred in the political processes of Afghanistan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia,
Palestine, Lebanon, Libya, and, most recently, Syria? Yes.

So you keep up your whining if it makes you feel better. Please note the *past
tense* used throughout your cited report.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

Funny thing the Iraqis, Afghans, Libyans, Syrians, Lebanese,Palestians
(well maybe palestinians) don't seem to think so.

How many letters have come in thanking us?

How many bombers have tried to drive us out?

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:33:32 GMT, "Jim," wrote:

John H wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:45:53 GMT, "Jim," wrote:


John H wrote:


On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:29:32 GMT, "Jim," wrote:



JimH wrote:


Well in the strict definition of the word mess -- Iraq is a mess because
the US bombed most of the infrastructure all to hell.


Bull****. In almost every case the infrastructure is better than before the war
started.



In the mode I intended it, Iraq is a mess because we have accomplished
little, at a loss of 1500 lives, Billions of Dollars, infinite loss of
respect from both the countries of the middle east, and out former
allies in Europe.


Bull****. Most of the world would agree that the changes to the mideast amount
to a very significant accomplishment.



As for Osama -- he was declared to be our primary target following 9/11.
It's been well over 3 years and we haven't got him -- probably because
of the distraction of Iraq.


More bull****. It took the police and FBI twenty plus years to catch the BTK
killer in Wichita. What the hell are you folks going to bitch about when Osama
*is* caught? Ninety percent of your whining rationale will be gone.



Do *YOU* think Iraq is a well ordered, well run place you might like to
vacation to?


I suppose it would be better off if the Iraqis were getting killed and dumped at
the rate of 30,000 =/- per year?

Would you like to vacation in Kosovo?

Jimcomma, you lost the election. Your whines and rants do nothing to serve your
liberal interests.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes


Here is the DRAFT of an OFFICIAL report John -- Suggest you read what
our own Center for Strategic and International studies has to say.

http://www.sftt.org/PDF/article01042005a.pdf

Chapter 1 Failures in recognizing the growth and character of the
insurgent threat

Chapter 2 Evolving threat tactics and pressure on government forces

Chapter 3 The evolving nature of the insurgency


Were mistakes made? Yes. Could we have done better at recognizing the insurgent
threat? Yes.

Are the Iraqis better off now than under Saddam? Yes. Have major changes
occurred in the political processes of Afghanistan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia,
Palestine, Lebanon, Libya, and, most recently, Syria? Yes.

So you keep up your whining if it makes you feel better. Please note the *past
tense* used throughout your cited report.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

Funny thing the Iraqis, Afghans, Libyans, Syrians, Lebanese,Palestians
(well maybe palestinians) don't seem to think so.

How many letters have come in thanking us?

You won't see any thanks in what you watch or read. Remember, it must be
anti-Bush. Therefore nothing good can be shown.

How many bombers have tried to drive us out?

I believe they're killing many more Iraqis now, especially in or around mosques.

Wake up.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

John H wrote:

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:33:32 GMT, "Jim," wrote:


John H wrote:

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:45:53 GMT, "Jim," wrote:



John H wrote:



On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:29:32 GMT, "Jim," wrote:




JimH wrote:


Well in the strict definition of the word mess -- Iraq is a mess because
the US bombed most of the infrastructure all to hell.


Bull****. In almost every case the infrastructure is better than before the war
started.




In the mode I intended it, Iraq is a mess because we have accomplished
little, at a loss of 1500 lives, Billions of Dollars, infinite loss of
respect from both the countries of the middle east, and out former
allies in Europe.


Bull****. Most of the world would agree that the changes to the mideast amount
to a very significant accomplishment.




As for Osama -- he was declared to be our primary target following 9/11.
It's been well over 3 years and we haven't got him -- probably because
of the distraction of Iraq.


More bull****. It took the police and FBI twenty plus years to catch the BTK
killer in Wichita. What the hell are you folks going to bitch about when Osama
*is* caught? Ninety percent of your whining rationale will be gone.




Do *YOU* think Iraq is a well ordered, well run place you might like to
vacation to?


I suppose it would be better off if the Iraqis were getting killed and dumped at
the rate of 30,000 =/- per year?

Would you like to vacation in Kosovo?

Jimcomma, you lost the election. Your whines and rants do nothing to serve your
liberal interests.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes


Here is the DRAFT of an OFFICIAL report John -- Suggest you read what
our own Center for Strategic and International studies has to say.

http://www.sftt.org/PDF/article01042005a.pdf

Chapter 1 Failures in recognizing the growth and character of the
insurgent threat

Chapter 2 Evolving threat tactics and pressure on government forces

Chapter 3 The evolving nature of the insurgency


Were mistakes made? Yes. Could we have done better at recognizing the insurgent
threat? Yes.

Are the Iraqis better off now than under Saddam? Yes. Have major changes
occurred in the political processes of Afghanistan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia,
Palestine, Lebanon, Libya, and, most recently, Syria? Yes.

So you keep up your whining if it makes you feel better. Please note the *past
tense* used throughout your cited report.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

Funny thing the Iraqis, Afghans, Libyans, Syrians, Lebanese,Palestians
(well maybe palestinians) don't seem to think so.

How many letters have come in thanking us?


You won't see any thanks in what you watch or read. Remember, it must be
anti-Bush. Therefore nothing good can be shown.

Even on Faux news??????

How many bombers have tried to drive us out?


I believe they're killing many more Iraqis now, especially in or around mosques.

More is a relative thing -- we are still loosing about 5/week; and
that's 5 too many for Me!

Wake up.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

"Jim," wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:45:53 GMT, "Jim," wrote:


John H wrote:


On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:29:32 GMT, "Jim," wrote:



JimH wrote:


Well in the strict definition of the word mess -- Iraq is a mess
because the US bombed most of the infrastructure all to hell.


Bull****. In almost every case the infrastructure is better than before
the war
started.



In the mode I intended it, Iraq is a mess because we have accomplished
little, at a loss of 1500 lives, Billions of Dollars, infinite loss of
respect from both the countries of the middle east, and out former
allies in Europe.


Bull****. Most of the world would agree that the changes to the mideast
amount
to a very significant accomplishment.


As for Osama -- he was declared to be our primary target following
9/11. It's been well over 3 years and we haven't got him -- probably
because of the distraction of Iraq.


More bull****. It took the police and FBI twenty plus years to catch the
BTK
killer in Wichita. What the hell are you folks going to bitch about when
Osama
*is* caught? Ninety percent of your whining rationale will be gone.



Do *YOU* think Iraq is a well ordered, well run place you might like to
vacation to?


I suppose it would be better off if the Iraqis were getting killed and
dumped at
the rate of 30,000 =/- per year?
Would you like to vacation in Kosovo?

Jimcomma, you lost the election. Your whines and rants do nothing to
serve your
liberal interests.
John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary
to resolve it." Rene Descartes


Here is the DRAFT of an OFFICIAL report John -- Suggest you read what our
own Center for Strategic and International studies has to say.

http://www.sftt.org/PDF/article01042005a.pdf

Chapter 1 Failures in recognizing the growth and character of the
insurgent threat

Chapter 2 Evolving threat tactics and pressure on government forces

Chapter 3 The evolving nature of the insurgency


Were mistakes made? Yes. Could we have done better at recognizing the
insurgent
threat? Yes.

Are the Iraqis better off now than under Saddam? Yes. Have major changes
occurred in the political processes of Afghanistan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia,
Palestine, Lebanon, Libya, and, most recently, Syria? Yes.

So you keep up your whining if it makes you feel better. Please note the
*past
tense* used throughout your cited report.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary
to resolve it." Rene Descartes

Funny thing the Iraqis, Afghans, Libyans, Syrians, Lebanese,Palestians
(well maybe palestinians) don't seem to think so.

How many letters have come in thanking us?

The latest count is 698,263.

On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:33:31 GMT, "Jim," wrote:

John H wrote:

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:33:32 GMT, "Jim," wrote:


John H wrote:

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:45:53 GMT, "Jim," wrote:



John H wrote:



On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:29:32 GMT, "Jim," wrote:




JimH wrote:


Well in the strict definition of the word mess -- Iraq is a mess because
the US bombed most of the infrastructure all to hell.


Bull****. In almost every case the infrastructure is better than before the war
started.




In the mode I intended it, Iraq is a mess because we have accomplished
little, at a loss of 1500 lives, Billions of Dollars, infinite loss of
respect from both the countries of the middle east, and out former
allies in Europe.


Bull****. Most of the world would agree that the changes to the mideast amount
to a very significant accomplishment.




As for Osama -- he was declared to be our primary target following 9/11.
It's been well over 3 years and we haven't got him -- probably because
of the distraction of Iraq.


More bull****. It took the police and FBI twenty plus years to catch the BTK
killer in Wichita. What the hell are you folks going to bitch about when Osama
*is* caught? Ninety percent of your whining rationale will be gone.




Do *YOU* think Iraq is a well ordered, well run place you might like to
vacation to?


I suppose it would be better off if the Iraqis were getting killed and dumped at
the rate of 30,000 =/- per year?

Would you like to vacation in Kosovo?

Jimcomma, you lost the election. Your whines and rants do nothing to serve your
liberal interests.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes


Here is the DRAFT of an OFFICIAL report John -- Suggest you read what
our own Center for Strategic and International studies has to say.

http://www.sftt.org/PDF/article01042005a.pdf

Chapter 1 Failures in recognizing the growth and character of the
insurgent threat

Chapter 2 Evolving threat tactics and pressure on government forces

Chapter 3 The evolving nature of the insurgency


Were mistakes made? Yes. Could we have done better at recognizing the insurgent
threat? Yes.

Are the Iraqis better off now than under Saddam? Yes. Have major changes
occurred in the political processes of Afghanistan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia,
Palestine, Lebanon, Libya, and, most recently, Syria? Yes.

So you keep up your whining if it makes you feel better. Please note the *past
tense* used throughout your cited report.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

Funny thing the Iraqis, Afghans, Libyans, Syrians, Lebanese,Palestians
(well maybe palestinians) don't seem to think so.

How many letters have come in thanking us?


You won't see any thanks in what you watch or read. Remember, it must be
anti-Bush. Therefore nothing good can be shown.

Even on Faux news??????

How many bombers have tried to drive us out?


I believe they're killing many more Iraqis now, especially in or around mosques.

More is a relative thing -- we are still loosing about 5/week; and
that's 5 too many for Me!

Wake up.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

Fox news shows the good, the bad, and the ugly. But, like all news it holds to
the credo, "If it bleeds, it leads."

One is too many. Three thousand in twenty minutes is also too many. Without some
significant changes in the mideast, which are occurring, it will happen again.
Better a few now, than thousands upon thousands later.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

John H wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:33:31 GMT, "Jim," wrote:


John H wrote:


On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:33:32 GMT, "Jim," wrote:



John H wrote:


On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:45:53 GMT, "Jim," wrote:




John H wrote:




On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:29:32 GMT, "Jim," wrote:





JimH wrote:


Well in the strict definition of the word mess -- Iraq is a mess because
the US bombed most of the infrastructure all to hell.


Bull****. In almost every case the infrastructure is better than before the war
started.





In the mode I intended it, Iraq is a mess because we have accomplished
little, at a loss of 1500 lives, Billions of Dollars, infinite loss of
respect from both the countries of the middle east, and out former
allies in Europe.


Bull****. Most of the world would agree that the changes to the mideast amount
to a very significant accomplishment.





As for Osama -- he was declared to be our primary target following 9/11.
It's been well over 3 years and we haven't got him -- probably because
of the distraction of Iraq.


More bull****. It took the police and FBI twenty plus years to catch the BTK
killer in Wichita. What the hell are you folks going to bitch about when Osama
*is* caught? Ninety percent of your whining rationale will be gone.





Do *YOU* think Iraq is a well ordered, well run place you might like to
vacation to?


I suppose it would be better off if the Iraqis were getting killed and dumped at
the rate of 30,000 =/- per year?

Would you like to vacation in Kosovo?

Jimcomma, you lost the election. Your whines and rants do nothing to serve your
liberal interests.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes


Here is the DRAFT of an OFFICIAL report John -- Suggest you read what
our own Center for Strategic and International studies has to say.

http://www.sftt.org/PDF/article01042005a.pdf

Chapter 1 Failures in recognizing the growth and character of the
insurgent threat

Chapter 2 Evolving threat tactics and pressure on government forces

Chapter 3 The evolving nature of the insurgency


Were mistakes made? Yes. Could we have done better at recognizing the insurgent
threat? Yes.

Are the Iraqis better off now than under Saddam? Yes. Have major changes
occurred in the political processes of Afghanistan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia,
Palestine, Lebanon, Libya, and, most recently, Syria? Yes.

So you keep up your whining if it makes you feel better. Please note the *past
tense* used throughout your cited report.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

Funny thing the Iraqis, Afghans, Libyans, Syrians, Lebanese,Palestians
(well maybe palestinians) don't seem to think so.

How many letters have come in thanking us?


You won't see any thanks in what you watch or read. Remember, it must be
anti-Bush. Therefore nothing good can be shown.

Even on Faux news??????

How many bombers have tried to drive us out?


I believe they're killing many more Iraqis now, especially in or around mosques.

More is a relative thing -- we are still loosing about 5/week; and
that's 5 too many for Me!

Wake up.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes


Fox news shows the good, the bad, and the ugly. But, like all news it holds to
the credo, "If it bleeds, it leads."

One is too many. Three thousand in twenty minutes is also too many. Without some
significant changes in the mideast, which are occurring, it will happen again.
Better a few now, than thousands upon thousands later.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

"Better a few now, than thousands upon thousands later."

Every one we kill has brothers, cousins, friends ready to avenge him.
That's been their way of life for thousands of years.

Don't forget those (is it 700?) virgins they get for killing an infidel.

(Wonder what the women get?)