"Jim," wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:

"Jim," wrote in message
...

P.Fritz wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
m...


On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:20:20 GMT, "Jim," wrote:



John H wrote:


On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:46:47 GMT, "Jim," wrote:




GANNONGATE -- MAINSTREAM MEDIA BLACKOUT: It's a story flush with
intrigue -- CIA secrets, White House malfeasance, hidden identities,
even male prostitution. Yet, as Salon.com's Eric Boehlert describes,
the
serious questions surrounding White House "reporter" Jeff Gannon
(http://www.americanprogressaction.or...P7H&b=387763#2)
have received only scant coverage in the mainstream media; two of
the
broadcast television networks, "as well as scores of major
metropolitan
newspapers around the country, have completely ignored it
(http://salon.com/news/feature/2005/0...age/index.html)
."
And evidence of a double standard is plentiful. Just two months ago,
"virtually every major news outlet" covered a similar (yet far less
egregious) story involving Edward Lee Pitts, the Tennessee reporter
"who
helped a National Guardsman craft a tough question posed to
Secretary
Rumsfeld regarding the lack of body armor for U.S. soldiers fighting
in
Iraq."



And......

No one gives a rat's ass!!!

He *did* ask a great question though...

"Thank you. Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak
picture of the
U.S. economy. [Senate Minority Leader] Harry Reid [D-NV] was talking
about soup
lines. And [Senator] Hillary Clinton [D-NY] was talking about the
economy being
on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that Social
Security
is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to
work -- you've
said you are going to reach out to these people -- how are you going
to work
with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"

I think the above is part of the aforementioned
"White House malfeasance"


John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and
necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

Your back to the chant John -- How about a little effort trying to
answer the questions raised earlier?

Your questions have no bearing on anything more worthwhile than a rat's
ass.
And, I don't give a rat's ass.

He had as much right to ask a loaded question as any of the
'accredited' liberal
'journalists' did (and do). Watch a few White House briefings and
you'll
understand what I mean.


It is pretty funny watching the liebrals hyperventilate about a 2 bit
reporter, as if it is going to be the lynch pin that brings down Bush.
They haven't learned a thing from their series of electoral defeats.





John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary
to resolve it."
Rene Descartes



A phony 2 bit homosexual reporter........


What does him being homosexual have to do with anything?

Well -- as I recall Republicans have somewhat of an aversion to sex. How
much was it that the republican congress spent "investigating" a BJ for
the Clinton? -- The number 50 MILLION sort of sticks in my mind. Now if
Gannon got a pass for just a BJ - kinda makes you wonder...

That is not an answer. What does him being homosexual have to do with
anything? Are you a homophobe?

JimH wrote:

"Jim," wrote in message
...

JimH wrote:


"Jim," wrote in message
...


P.Fritz wrote:



"John H" wrote in message
om...



On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:20:20 GMT, "Jim," wrote:




John H wrote:



On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:46:47 GMT, "Jim," wrote:





GANNONGATE -- MAINSTREAM MEDIA BLACKOUT: It's a story flush with
intrigue -- CIA secrets, White House malfeasance, hidden identities,
even male prostitution. Yet, as Salon.com's Eric Boehlert describes,
the
serious questions surrounding White House "reporter" Jeff Gannon
(http://www.americanprogressaction.or...P7H&b=387763#2)
have received only scant coverage in the mainstream media; two of
the
broadcast television networks, "as well as scores of major
metropolitan
newspapers around the country, have completely ignored it
(http://salon.com/news/feature/2005/0...age/index.html)
."
And evidence of a double standard is plentiful. Just two months ago,
"virtually every major news outlet" covered a similar (yet far less
egregious) story involving Edward Lee Pitts, the Tennessee reporter
"who
helped a National Guardsman craft a tough question posed to
Secretary
Rumsfeld regarding the lack of body armor for U.S. soldiers fighting
in
Iraq."



And......

No one gives a rat's ass!!!

He *did* ask a great question though...

"Thank you. Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak
picture of the
U.S. economy. [Senate Minority Leader] Harry Reid [D-NV] was talking
about soup
lines. And [Senator] Hillary Clinton [D-NY] was talking about the
economy being
on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that Social
Security
is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to
work -- you've
said you are going to reach out to these people -- how are you going
to work
with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"

I think the above is part of the aforementioned
"White House malfeasance"



John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and
necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

Your back to the chant John -- How about a little effort trying to
answer the questions raised earlier?

Your questions have no bearing on anything more worthwhile than a rat's
ass.
And, I don't give a rat's ass.

He had as much right to ask a loaded question as any of the
'accredited' liberal
'journalists' did (and do). Watch a few White House briefings and
you'll
understand what I mean.


It is pretty funny watching the liebrals hyperventilate about a 2 bit
reporter, as if it is going to be the lynch pin that brings down Bush.
They haven't learned a thing from their series of electoral defeats.






John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary
to resolve it."
Rene Descartes



A phony 2 bit homosexual reporter........


What does him being homosexual have to do with anything?

Well -- as I recall Republicans have somewhat of an aversion to sex. How
much was it that the republican congress spent "investigating" a BJ for
the Clinton? -- The number 50 MILLION sort of sticks in my mind. Now if
Gannon got a pass for just a BJ - kinda makes you wonder...


That is not an answer. What does him being homosexual have to do with
anything? Are you a homophobe?



Nope -- are you a homosexual?

"JimH" wrote in message
...

"Jim," wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:

"Jim," wrote in message
...

P.Fritz wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
om...


On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:20:20 GMT, "Jim," wrote:



John H wrote:


On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:46:47 GMT, "Jim,"
wrote:




GANNONGATE -- MAINSTREAM MEDIA BLACKOUT: It's a story flush with
intrigue -- CIA secrets, White House malfeasance, hidden
identities,
even male prostitution. Yet, as Salon.com's Eric Boehlert
describes, the
serious questions surrounding White House "reporter" Jeff Gannon
(http://www.americanprogressaction.or...P7H&b=387763#2)
have received only scant coverage in the mainstream media; two of
the
broadcast television networks, "as well as scores of major
metropolitan
newspapers around the country, have completely ignored it
(http://salon.com/news/feature/2005/0...age/index.html)
."
And evidence of a double standard is plentiful. Just two months
ago,
"virtually every major news outlet" covered a similar (yet far less
egregious) story involving Edward Lee Pitts, the Tennessee reporter
"who
helped a National Guardsman craft a tough question posed to
Secretary
Rumsfeld regarding the lack of body armor for U.S. soldiers
fighting in
Iraq."



And......

No one gives a rat's ass!!!

He *did* ask a great question though...

"Thank you. Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak
picture of the
U.S. economy. [Senate Minority Leader] Harry Reid [D-NV] was talking
about soup
lines. And [Senator] Hillary Clinton [D-NY] was talking about the
economy being
on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that
Social Security
is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to
work -- you've
said you are going to reach out to these people -- how are you going
to work
with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"

I think the above is part of the aforementioned
"White House malfeasance"


John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and
necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

Your back to the chant John -- How about a little effort trying to
answer the questions raised earlier?

Your questions have no bearing on anything more worthwhile than a
rat's ass.
And, I don't give a rat's ass.

He had as much right to ask a loaded question as any of the
'accredited' liberal
'journalists' did (and do). Watch a few White House briefings and
you'll
understand what I mean.


It is pretty funny watching the liebrals hyperventilate about a 2 bit
reporter, as if it is going to be the lynch pin that brings down Bush.
They haven't learned a thing from their series of electoral defeats.





John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and
necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes



A phony 2 bit homosexual reporter........


What does him being homosexual have to do with anything?

Well -- as I recall Republicans have somewhat of an aversion to sex. How
much was it that the republican congress spent "investigating" a BJ for
the Clinton? -- The number 50 MILLION sort of sticks in my mind. Now if
Gannon got a pass for just a BJ - kinda makes you wonder...

That is not an answer. What does him being homosexual have to do with
anything? Are you a homophobe?

The investigation was about perjury, a little factoid that the liebrals
like to ignore, the cost was due to the clinton's obstructing the
investigation.

Poor little liebrals, look what they have left to hang their hats on.

Harry does seem to be infatuated with JohnH.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:

Your questions have no bearing on anything more worthwhile than a rat's
ass.
And, I don't give a rat's ass.


Sure you do, Herringbreath...you keep commenting on this same subject,
over and over, ad nauseum.

No substitute babysitting today?

"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in message
...
Harry does seem to be infatuated with JohnH.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:

Your questions have no bearing on anything more worthwhile than a rat's
ass.
And, I don't give a rat's ass.


Sure you do, Herringbreath...you keep commenting on this same subject,
over and over, ad nauseum.

No substitute babysitting today?



Go figure....and he often claims to have John killfiled. He also responds
to my posts even though I am supposedly killfiled also. A very strange
fascination this person has with some of us.

I just ignore the guy....he is a liar, an internet stalker and has
absolutely nothing to offer. He has also taken over the crown of "NG Idiot"
since bassy left.

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:10:10 -0500, "Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd."
wrote:

Harry does seem to be infatuated with JohnH.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:

Your questions have no bearing on anything more worthwhile than a rat's
ass.
And, I don't give a rat's ass.


Sure you do, Herringbreath...you keep commenting on this same subject,
over and over, ad nauseum.

No substitute babysitting today?


Jeeez! Is he still around?

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:43:00 GMT, "Jim," wrote:

P.Fritz wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:20:20 GMT, "Jim," wrote:


John H wrote:

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:46:47 GMT, "Jim," wrote:



GANNONGATE -- MAINSTREAM MEDIA BLACKOUT: It's a story flush with
intrigue -- CIA secrets, White House malfeasance, hidden identities,
even male prostitution. Yet, as Salon.com's Eric Boehlert describes, the
serious questions surrounding White House "reporter" Jeff Gannon
(http://www.americanprogressaction.or...P7H&b=387763#2)
have received only scant coverage in the mainstream media; two of the
broadcast television networks, "as well as scores of major metropolitan
newspapers around the country, have completely ignored it
(http://salon.com/news/feature/2005/0...age/index.html) ."
And evidence of a double standard is plentiful. Just two months ago,
"virtually every major news outlet" covered a similar (yet far less
egregious) story involving Edward Lee Pitts, the Tennessee reporter "who
helped a National Guardsman craft a tough question posed to Secretary
Rumsfeld regarding the lack of body armor for U.S. soldiers fighting in
Iraq."



And......

No one gives a rat's ass!!!

He *did* ask a great question though...

"Thank you. Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture
of the
U.S. economy. [Senate Minority Leader] Harry Reid [D-NV] was talking
about soup
lines. And [Senator] Hillary Clinton [D-NY] was talking about the
economy being
on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that Social
Security
is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to work --
you've
said you are going to reach out to these people -- how are you going to
work
with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"

I think the above is part of the aforementioned
"White House malfeasance"

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary
to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

Your back to the chant John -- How about a little effort trying to
answer the questions raised earlier?

Your questions have no bearing on anything more worthwhile than a rat's
ass.
And, I don't give a rat's ass.

He had as much right to ask a loaded question as any of the 'accredited'
liberal
'journalists' did (and do). Watch a few White House briefings and you'll
understand what I mean.


It is pretty funny watching the liebrals hyperventilate about a 2 bit
reporter, as if it is going to be the lynch pin that brings down Bush.
They haven't learned a thing from their series of electoral defeats.





John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes




A phony 2 bit homosexual reporter, getting access to the POTUS seems
more important to me than a BJ in the oval office. (which raises the
question of if, and if so who was getting BJs from said reporter?)

Being homosexual is suddenly bad in the eyes of liberals? Or was that a
compliment?

He was no more phony than the crowd that normally occupies the place. Watch a
couple White House briefings.

He
http://www.c-span.org/VideoArchives....irs=Issue,WHE;

Go check out a couple and then come back to tell us how 'unbiased' your major
media guys are.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:53:17 GMT, "Jim," wrote:

JimH wrote:

"Jim," wrote in message
...

P.Fritz wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
m...


On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:20:20 GMT, "Jim," wrote:



John H wrote:


On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:46:47 GMT, "Jim," wrote:




GANNONGATE -- MAINSTREAM MEDIA BLACKOUT: It's a story flush with
intrigue -- CIA secrets, White House malfeasance, hidden identities,
even male prostitution. Yet, as Salon.com's Eric Boehlert describes,
the
serious questions surrounding White House "reporter" Jeff Gannon
(http://www.americanprogressaction.or...P7H&b=387763#2)
have received only scant coverage in the mainstream media; two of the
broadcast television networks, "as well as scores of major
metropolitan
newspapers around the country, have completely ignored it
(http://salon.com/news/feature/2005/0...age/index.html)
."
And evidence of a double standard is plentiful. Just two months ago,
"virtually every major news outlet" covered a similar (yet far less
egregious) story involving Edward Lee Pitts, the Tennessee reporter
"who
helped a National Guardsman craft a tough question posed to Secretary
Rumsfeld regarding the lack of body armor for U.S. soldiers fighting
in
Iraq."



And......

No one gives a rat's ass!!!

He *did* ask a great question though...

"Thank you. Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture
of the
U.S. economy. [Senate Minority Leader] Harry Reid [D-NV] was talking
about soup
lines. And [Senator] Hillary Clinton [D-NY] was talking about the
economy being
on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that Social
Security
is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to work --
you've
said you are going to reach out to these people -- how are you going to
work
with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"

I think the above is part of the aforementioned
"White House malfeasance"


John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary
to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

Your back to the chant John -- How about a little effort trying to
answer the questions raised earlier?

Your questions have no bearing on anything more worthwhile than a rat's
ass.
And, I don't give a rat's ass.

He had as much right to ask a loaded question as any of the 'accredited'
liberal
'journalists' did (and do). Watch a few White House briefings and you'll
understand what I mean.


It is pretty funny watching the liebrals hyperventilate about a 2 bit
reporter, as if it is going to be the lynch pin that brings down Bush.
They haven't learned a thing from their series of electoral defeats.





John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary
to resolve it."
Rene Descartes



A phony 2 bit homosexual reporter........


What does him being homosexual have to do with anything?



Well -- as I recall Republicans have somewhat of an aversion to sex.
How much was it that the republican congress spent "investigating" a BJ
for the Clinton? -- The number 50 MILLION sort of sticks in my mind.
Now if Gannon got a pass for just a BJ - kinda makes you wonder...

Given the Republican 'aversion' to sex that you so proudly proclaim, how could
you *possibly* intimate that a *Republican* granted some kind of unauthorized
access to the White House for a blow job?

Must be a queer Democrat in the woodpile, based on your logic.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:40:01 GMT, "Jim," wrote:

John H wrote:

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:20:20 GMT, "Jim," wrote:


John H wrote:

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:46:47 GMT, "Jim," wrote:



GANNONGATE -- MAINSTREAM MEDIA BLACKOUT: It's a story flush with
intrigue -- CIA secrets, White House malfeasance, hidden identities,
even male prostitution. Yet, as Salon.com's Eric Boehlert describes, the
serious questions surrounding White House "reporter" Jeff Gannon
(http://www.americanprogressaction.or...P7H&b=387763#2)
have received only scant coverage in the mainstream media; two of the
broadcast television networks, "as well as scores of major metropolitan
newspapers around the country, have completely ignored it
(http://salon.com/news/feature/2005/0...age/index.html) ."
And evidence of a double standard is plentiful. Just two months ago,
"virtually every major news outlet" covered a similar (yet far less
egregious) story involving Edward Lee Pitts, the Tennessee reporter "who
helped a National Guardsman craft a tough question posed to Secretary
Rumsfeld regarding the lack of body armor for U.S. soldiers fighting in
Iraq."



And......

No one gives a rat's ass!!!

He *did* ask a great question though...

"Thank you. Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture of the
U.S. economy. [Senate Minority Leader] Harry Reid [D-NV] was talking about soup
lines. And [Senator] Hillary Clinton [D-NY] was talking about the economy being
on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that Social Security
is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to work -- you've
said you are going to reach out to these people -- how are you going to work
with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"

I think the above is part of the aforementioned
"White House malfeasance"

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

Your back to the chant John -- How about a little effort trying to
answer the questions raised earlier?


Your questions have no bearing on anything more worthwhile than a rat's ass.
And, I don't give a rat's ass.

He had as much right to ask a loaded question as any of the 'accredited' liberal
'journalists' did (and do). Watch a few White House briefings and you'll
understand what I mean.


John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

Your questions have no bearing on anything more worthwhile than a
rat's ass. And, I don't give a rat's ass.

Translation -- I can't answer any of them without further making a
bigger fool of myself.

Only for a few would a translation be necessary!

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes