Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "D Fortner" wrote in message om... Actually, not true in all cases. I have a '76 Silverton with v-drive, in my case the engine block is mounted to a Borg Warner Velvet Drive tranny, which is then bolted to the Walter V-drive gearbox. My Velvet drive is 1:1, my Walter V-drive gear box is a model 10 with 1.5:1. Next, the poster that said that a Borg Warner Velvet Drive is available in stright or V-drive is correct. It IS available in various straight and V-drive configurations, with different "V" angles and gear ratios. The V-drive configuration is one sealed unit. The V-drive configuration isn't as common as the straight drive. You are correct in that most boat manufactures that use V-drives do so to keep the engines below the cockpit deck, thus allowing for more room in the cabin. Later . . . Captain Dave Fortner "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... I believe the Borg-Warner "Velvet Drive" trademark can be a straight or a V configuration. They made both. The "V drive" component is completely separate from the transmission. You still need a gear box to select FNR, and I don't know why you couldn't use just about any mfgrs tran. The straight shaft running from forward facing tranny couples to the "V" drive assembly. The V drive is 1:1, so no additional calculating is involved when considering reduction rations in the main gearbox. Not uncommon for the stern tube to be directly *below* the engine on a V drive configuration, allowing the engine(s) to be farther aft than on a straight inboard. Most V drives are used to move the engine to the back of the boat for more room. Most of the V drives were in ski boats. Heck, we used to call them Vee drive boats. We had a Mandella, with a velvet drive and transmission in one unit. Lots of the Vee drives just had an in/out box and some were direct drive. Ready to ski, fire up the motor! Bill Bill |