View Single Post
  #6   Report Post  
Calif Bill
 
Posts: n/a
Default Are V-Drives and Velvet Drives the same thing?


"D Fortner" wrote in message
om...
Actually, not true in all cases. I have a '76 Silverton with v-drive, in

my
case the engine block is mounted to a Borg Warner Velvet Drive tranny,

which
is then bolted to the Walter V-drive gearbox. My Velvet drive is 1:1, my
Walter V-drive gear box is a model 10 with 1.5:1.

Next, the poster that said that a Borg Warner Velvet Drive is available in
stright or V-drive is correct. It IS available in various straight and
V-drive configurations, with different "V" angles and gear ratios. The
V-drive configuration is one sealed unit. The V-drive configuration isn't

as
common as the straight drive.

You are correct in that most boat manufactures that use V-drives do so to
keep the engines below the cockpit deck, thus allowing for more room in

the
cabin.

Later . . .
Captain Dave Fortner


"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
I believe the Borg-Warner "Velvet Drive" trademark can be a straight

or
a V configuration.
They made both.


The "V drive" component is completely separate from the transmission.

You
still
need a gear box to select FNR, and I don't know why you couldn't use

just
about
any mfgrs tran. The straight shaft running from forward facing tranny

couples
to the "V" drive assembly. The V drive is 1:1, so no additional

calculating is
involved when considering reduction rations in the main gearbox.

Not uncommon for the stern tube to be directly *below* the engine on a V

drive
configuration, allowing the engine(s) to be farther aft than on a

straight
inboard.




Most V drives are used to move the engine to the back of the boat for more
room. Most of the V drives were in ski boats. Heck, we used to call them
Vee drive boats. We had a Mandella, with a velvet drive and transmission in
one unit. Lots of the Vee drives just had an in/out box and some were
direct drive. Ready to ski, fire up the motor!
Bill

Bill