On 14 Feb 2005 13:41:53 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


John H wrote:
On 14 Feb 2005 11:36:44 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


John H wrote:
On 14 Feb 2005 06:30:51 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


P.Fritz wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On 11 Feb 2005 13:01:43 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message

roups.com...

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message

roups.com...

JimH wrote:
"Jim," wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:

"Jim," wrote in message
...







http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...us/sept_11_faa

Excerpt:
The FAA received repeated warnings in the months
prior
to
9-11
about
al-Qaida and
its desire to attack airlines from April to
Sept.
10,
2001,
according to
a secret report
by Bush's 9-112 Whitewash Committee. The
commission
report,
written last
August,
but kept from the American people until after
the
election
said
five
security warnings
mentioned al-Qaida's training for hijackings and
two
reports
concerned
suicide operations
not connected to aviation.


Yes, the FAA failed to act. Is that your point
or
are
you
trying
to pin
this on the President? Me thinks so. ;-)
And the buck stops where?

God. It is all his fault.

Ah, you're finally getting something, but it's a tad
more
complex
than
that. It's the narrow minded mentality of the God
fearing!
If
it
weren't for the people of the world worshiping
something
that
doesn't
exist, and can't be proven to exist, the world would
be
a
much
more
peaceful place.


You can go on believing what you want Bassy. Just
don't
scorn
those
who do
believe in God.

First, I'll do as I please. Secondly, I didn't "scorn"
anyone.


Pardon me. I guess you didn't write this:
===========
"It's the narrow minded mentality of the God fearing! If
it
weren't
for
the people of the world worshiping something that doesn't
exist,
and can't
be proven to exist, the world would be a much more
peaceful
place."
===========
I guess I am mistaken...you did not write that.....right?

Asslicker once again displays why he is a mental midget and
"King
of
the NG
idiots" One just has to look at the recent past of the
internal
'peacefulness' of the former Soviet Union and China,
Cambodia,
etc
etc, to
see what a world devoid of religion would be
like.........asslicker's
FAS
must prevent him from remembering past his last usenet
post.


I wonder if he has stopped beating his wife yet?


Hmm, YOU post that I beat my wife, over and over again, like
some
idiot, and then have the audacity to call ME a mental
midget???
Again,
answer the question, where to **** did you get the idea that
I
beat
my
wife? Can't answer it can you, Fritz? At least your wife
isn't
still
beating you, she couldn't stand to be around your pathetic
childish
actions. Grow up and be a man.

Same with FAS, please show any shred of evidence.....You
can't,
you
are
blindly and ignorantly posting such.
Now, to show YOUR ignorance. The former Soviet Union? VERY
large
population of Catholics. You must like them, hell, they are
the
one's
who push guilt the best. China? Buddism, Taoism, Islam, AND
Christianity. Cambodia? Theravada Buddhism, Hinduism, Khmer.
Sorry,
again, you've shown your ignorance, but in this post, you've
shown
it
several times!!!!

He never said you beat your wife, basskisser.
John H

Absouletely correct......I have never stated that asslicker
beats
his
wife.

What a bunch of ****! Now, Fritz said "Does he (me) still beat
his
wife?" Now that sentence certainly says that Fritz thinks I beat
my
wife. IF he had enough intelligence to put it like "I wonder if
he
(me)
beats his wife", the context would be completely diffferent.

Let's try this, John. If I asked you, John, have you stopped
molesting
children at your school, would you say that I am implying that
you
DO
molest children, or would you say, well, he didn't directly say
that
I
did, so that's quite all right for him to spread that slanderous
lie?

I would simply say, "I never started."

But, if you'll recall, a few months back you were making
implications
about me
and child porn. Do I have any sympathy for you? Hell no! What goes
around comes
around. You deserve what you get.

John H

Oh, no, John. YOU made a statement about reading child pornography.
I
simply made people aware of YOUR EXACT WORDS. Now, show me where I
EVER
said anything about beating my wife. Please do, I'll be waiting.
I'll
ask again, do YOU think that it's quite all right for Fritz to post
slanderous lies about someone else?

I stated no such thing. You made inappropriate implications. Fritz
has not, to
my knowledge, stated that you beat your wife. Therefore, no
slanderous lie has
been uttered (on this subject, anyway).

John H

Ah, not swift enough to understand the word implication, huh? Now, all
would be different, if Fritz, in his childish diatribes asked "Does
basskisser beat his wife?" BUT, that isn't what he's asked. He asked,
several different times, "Is basskisser still beating his wife"? Now,
the word STILL would certainly IMPLY that he knows something about the
subject, would it not? Therefore, there is an IMPLICATION. Understand?
I doubt it. I'll bet I get several silly questions from you, because
you DON'T, then when you figure out your are wrong....again...you'll
start posting over and over again the something, silly like an old
drunkard.


Good. You're learning the difference between a statement and an implication.

Now, based on your views of 'poster responsibility' (or lack thereof), is Fritz
responsible for the implication?

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

"John H" wrote in message
...
On 14 Feb 2005 13:41:53 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


John H wrote:
On 14 Feb 2005 11:36:44 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


John H wrote:
On 14 Feb 2005 06:30:51 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


P.Fritz wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On 11 Feb 2005 13:01:43 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message

roups.com...

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message

roups.com...

JimH wrote:
"Jim," wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:

"Jim," wrote in message
...







http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...us/sept_11_faa

Excerpt:
The FAA received repeated warnings in the months
prior
to
9-11
about
al-Qaida and
its desire to attack airlines from April to
Sept.
10,
2001,
according to
a secret report
by Bush's 9-112 Whitewash Committee. The
commission
report,
written last
August,
but kept from the American people until after
the
election
said
five
security warnings
mentioned al-Qaida's training for hijackings and
two
reports
concerned
suicide operations
not connected to aviation.


Yes, the FAA failed to act. Is that your point
or
are
you
trying
to pin
this on the President? Me thinks so. ;-)
And the buck stops where?

God. It is all his fault.

Ah, you're finally getting something, but it's a tad
more
complex
than
that. It's the narrow minded mentality of the God
fearing!
If
it
weren't for the people of the world worshiping
something
that
doesn't
exist, and can't be proven to exist, the world would
be
a
much
more
peaceful place.


You can go on believing what you want Bassy. Just
don't
scorn
those
who do
believe in God.

First, I'll do as I please. Secondly, I didn't "scorn"
anyone.


Pardon me. I guess you didn't write this:
===========
"It's the narrow minded mentality of the God fearing! If
it
weren't
for
the people of the world worshiping something that doesn't
exist,
and can't
be proven to exist, the world would be a much more
peaceful
place."
===========
I guess I am mistaken...you did not write that.....right?

Asslicker once again displays why he is a mental midget and
"King
of
the NG
idiots" One just has to look at the recent past of the
internal
'peacefulness' of the former Soviet Union and China,
Cambodia,
etc
etc, to
see what a world devoid of religion would be
like.........asslicker's
FAS
must prevent him from remembering past his last usenet
post.


I wonder if he has stopped beating his wife yet?


Hmm, YOU post that I beat my wife, over and over again, like
some
idiot, and then have the audacity to call ME a mental
midget???
Again,
answer the question, where to **** did you get the idea that
I
beat
my
wife? Can't answer it can you, Fritz? At least your wife
isn't
still
beating you, she couldn't stand to be around your pathetic
childish
actions. Grow up and be a man.

Same with FAS, please show any shred of evidence.....You
can't,
you
are
blindly and ignorantly posting such.
Now, to show YOUR ignorance. The former Soviet Union? VERY
large
population of Catholics. You must like them, hell, they are
the
one's
who push guilt the best. China? Buddism, Taoism, Islam, AND
Christianity. Cambodia? Theravada Buddhism, Hinduism, Khmer.
Sorry,
again, you've shown your ignorance, but in this post, you've
shown
it
several times!!!!

He never said you beat your wife, basskisser.
John H

Absouletely correct......I have never stated that asslicker
beats
his
wife.

What a bunch of ****! Now, Fritz said "Does he (me) still beat
his
wife?" Now that sentence certainly says that Fritz thinks I beat
my
wife. IF he had enough intelligence to put it like "I wonder if
he
(me)
beats his wife", the context would be completely diffferent.

Let's try this, John. If I asked you, John, have you stopped
molesting
children at your school, would you say that I am implying that
you
DO
molest children, or would you say, well, he didn't directly say
that
I
did, so that's quite all right for him to spread that slanderous
lie?

I would simply say, "I never started."

But, if you'll recall, a few months back you were making
implications
about me
and child porn. Do I have any sympathy for you? Hell no! What goes
around comes
around. You deserve what you get.

John H

Oh, no, John. YOU made a statement about reading child pornography.
I
simply made people aware of YOUR EXACT WORDS. Now, show me where I
EVER
said anything about beating my wife. Please do, I'll be waiting.
I'll
ask again, do YOU think that it's quite all right for Fritz to post
slanderous lies about someone else?

I stated no such thing. You made inappropriate implications. Fritz
has not, to
my knowledge, stated that you beat your wife. Therefore, no
slanderous lie has
been uttered (on this subject, anyway).

John H

Ah, not swift enough to understand the word implication, huh? Now, all
would be different, if Fritz, in his childish diatribes asked "Does
basskisser beat his wife?" BUT, that isn't what he's asked. He asked,
several different times, "Is basskisser still beating his wife"? Now,
the word STILL would certainly IMPLY that he knows something about the
subject, would it not? Therefore, there is an IMPLICATION. Understand?
I doubt it. I'll bet I get several silly questions from you, because
you DON'T, then when you figure out your are wrong....again...you'll
start posting over and over again the something, silly like an old
drunkard.


Good. You're learning the difference between a statement and an
implication.

Now, based on your views of 'poster responsibility' (or lack thereof),
is Fritz
responsible for the implication?

I wonder if asslciker left his drafting job foaming at the mouth today?

Cripes is it easy to make him dance..........................

Either that or the truth really hurts :-)


John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary
to resolve it."
Rene Descartes