When you guys are done with your goose-stepping and sniffing each others butts,
you might consider dragging yourselves back to the original point:

"why would anyone not choose to join a volunteer organization that required them
to be publicly (or at least semi publicly) finger printed?"

My answer to this question has produced nothing but insults. Thank you for making
my point. Your type of intelligent procedure is certainly going to do wonders for
national security.

DSK



"swatcop"
wrote:
Thanks for helping to meke my point, Bob. But I think this guy is a moron. I
replied to his last attempt at a reply, but I'm not going to reply to any
more of his posts unless he comes up with something intelligent that
actually applies to the topic. I think we're wasting our time.

Bob wrote:
what's amazing to me is how so many people think ANY kind of check is
an 'invasion of privacy'. do they think guys from saudi arabia who
spent time as jihadists in afghanistan should be allowed to fly planes
because, if we checked on their backgrounds, that's an 'invasion'? and
these are the same people who complain about the lack of diligence on
the part of defense agencies to protect the country...damned if you
do, damned if you don't.

---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field