Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() KMAN wrote: "Tinkerntom" wrote in message oups.com... KMAN wrote: "bearsbuddy" wrote in message . .. "Tinkerntom" wrote in message oups.com... So having said these things, I would like you to restate your position, and provide your supporting evidence, so that I can consider it with the other stuff removed. This should entail editing your above post, and copying your quoted evidence. Starting with a clean slate if you will. TnT I bet you played a HELL of a game of dodge-ball, as a child! Mark Tinkerntom never played dodge ball. Before the start of his first scheduled game, Tinkerntom began explaining what he expected of the other game participants. They were all too old to be in school by the time he was finished. But then he could always find someone else to play with, who was willing to play by the rules, and especially rules #1 thru #10. Rule #1 No name calling. If name calling becomes the predominant feature of the game, the game is no longer fun, intereresting, and thought provoking. The game can be called for name calling! Rule #2 Since denigrating statements do not contribute to the subject being discussed, but are typically diversions by those unable to support their own position, and typically do not add to the content of the discussion in a substantive way, continued use of denigrating statements can result in the game being called. Rule #3 Rules #1 and #2 can be applied to the current game, or to concurrent games being played, where the violations occur, that become distracting to the current game, and are cause for the current game to be called. Rule #4 Any topic is open to discussion if both parties agree, and are willing to provide supporting documentation as requested by other gamesters. Since failure to provide, results in unsupported BS littering the game field, which the various gamesters may step in, over, around, completely ignore, or stop the game momentarily to clean up. If all this fails, and the gamesters cannot determine a mutually acceptable agreement and resolution of the BS, the game may be called. #5 Other Rules can and will be made up by any participant, as the game progresses, and as applied to the current game, may result in the current game being called. #6 Excessive Rules can result in the game being called! #7 Enforcement of the rules is up to, and at the discreation of each gamester, allowing him/her, to call the game as far as his participation, if others choose to continue to play, that is at there descreation. #8 The Game can be played as long as there are at least two participants who have not called the game or conceded. #9 Any Gamester, may set on the sidelines for any indeterminate amount of time, and may rejoin the game at any time, and if all others have called the game, or conceded, may attempt to restart the game at any time another gamester can be found willing to play. #10 Have Fun! Thanks for your interest. TnT Translation: Tinkerntom spent a lot of time alone. Can you support that with any documentation, or proof, or is it just BS. I played chess, which is typically a game between two individuals. I compensated by playing multiple games at the same time. Some games were very short lived, but it allowed us to start another game immediately. These were the best games though, because usually the gamesters were not so vested in winning, and just wanted to have fun. Other games lasted for quite awhile, and seemed to be enjoyable to all involved, who also typically wanted to immediately wanted to play again in order to redeem their apparently shattered egoes. They should have known better than to put their egoes on the line. I am not sure why they were so willing to put their egoes on the line again, if it hurt so much the last time. Eventually they apparently did not enjoy the game so much and would get all mean and nasty over a game. It is still a mystery to me! I eventually wearied of playing on a flat static game board though and sought greater challenges. I found the tableau of our mind very interesting and stimulating. You can engage each other where ever you find yourselves, and can even use the electronic media. It is a wonderful, exciting world that we live in, with all the eligible challengers. TnT |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crimes Against Nature-- RFK, Jr. Interview | General |