On 4-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

How, exactly, does the Bible "deem" how God manifests himself as
himself?

How about if it _says_ so. Try reading the Bible - it does describe
these things. And nowhere does it say "this is what God looks like".

Thus, if he "manifests" himself as a man,
or a burning bush, he is manifesting himself as himself.

Once again, you prefer playing with words instead of addressing
the issue directly. If he manifests himself as a man, we cannot
tell it is God. That is exactly my point. We need a manifestation
that we can clearly identify as God and the Bible offers nothing
to help that.

Mike

A Usenet persona calling itself Michael Daly wrote:

On 4-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

How, exactly, does the Bible "deem" how God manifests himself as
himself?

How about if it _says_ so. Try reading the Bible - it does describe
these things. And nowhere does it say "this is what God looks like".

And does it have to say "this is what God looks like" in order for God to
decide to look like something else? What makes you think that God is
constrained by the words in a book?


Thus, if he "manifests" himself as a man,
or a burning bush, he is manifesting himself as himself.

Once again, you prefer playing with words instead of addressing
the issue directly. If he manifests himself as a man, we cannot
tell it is God. That is exactly my point.

Which is pretty much no point at all.

We need a manifestation
that we can clearly identify as God and the Bible offers nothing
to help that.

What you "need" and what God decides to provide are often two different
things. Do you think you have the authority to compel God to restrict God's
manifestations to appearances that you approve of? How hubric.


--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

© 2005 Scott Weiser

On 7-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

And does it have to say "this is what God looks like" in order for God to
decide to look like something else? What makes you think that God is
constrained by the words in a book?

It is clearly a waste of time trying to discuss this with you.
TinkernTom has already pointed out that what I am talking
about is over your head.

Mike

A Usenet persona calling itself Michael Daly wrote:

On 7-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

And does it have to say "this is what God looks like" in order for God to
decide to look like something else? What makes you think that God is
constrained by the words in a book?

It is clearly a waste of time trying to discuss this with you.

Clearly. You are simply too stupid to go beyond your preconceptions and
deep-seated fear of religion.

TinkernTom has already pointed out that what I am talking
about is over your head.

No, it's over your head. I'm merely arguing at your level. Should you raise
the level of discussion beyond rhetorical claptrap, I'll be glad to advance
the issue with you. But so long as your best arguments are the sort of
shallow thinking you've exhibited here, I see no reason to try to teach you
anything more sophisticated.

--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

© 2005 Scott Weiser

On 8-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

Clearly. You are simply too stupid to go beyond your preconceptions and
deep-seated fear of religion.

There you go inventing stories about me based on nothing I ever said.
You're still nothing but bull****.

I'm merely arguing at your level.

You couldn't if you tried. You have never bothered to offer
any facts.

Mike