Remember Me?
Menu
Home
Search
Today's Posts
Home
Search
Today's Posts
BoatBanter.com
»
rec.boats.paddle
»
General
>
Bill Moyers on environment, politics and Christian fundamentalists
Reply
LinkBack
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes
#
1
KMAN
Posts: n/a
in article et, rick at
wrote on 3/2/05 5:42 PM:
"KMAN" wrote in message
. ..
"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...
"Tinkerntom" wrote in message
ups.com...
KMAN wrote:
snip...
rick, I would encourage you to allow KMAN to modify and
clarify his
previous statement inasmuch as he has acknowledged that it is
not what
he meant to say, and then if desired, discuss that as a new
issue.
=====================
He has already modified his ststement. After he was caught in
his lie. the ststement was not out of context. It sauid
exactly as I claimed. If you are waiting 2 years for a test
ot proceedure that your doctor has already determined you
need, then you are waiting for treatment. That is not what he
said. He made the direct statement that no one waits for
treatment.
I said that in your specific example, no one is waiting for
treatment. They are waiting for a specific test, while under
the continuing care of the physician, and receiving the
specific test sooner if it becomes essential to that care.
==================
Nope. What you said is that no one is waiting for treatment.
Yes, in response to your allegation that the people featured in the story
were waiting for treatment. They aren't. And you are a scumbag for taking my
statement out of that context and trying to say that I was referring to all
persons in Canada.
You owe me an apology, but you are too weak and too big of a coward to do
it.
Reply With Quote
#
2
rick
Posts: n/a
"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 3/2/05 5:42 PM:
"KMAN" wrote in message
. ..
"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...
"Tinkerntom" wrote in message
ups.com...
KMAN wrote:
snip...
rick, I would encourage you to allow KMAN to modify and
clarify his
previous statement inasmuch as he has acknowledged that it
is
not what
he meant to say, and then if desired, discuss that as a new
issue.
=====================
He has already modified his ststement. After he was caught
in
his lie. the ststement was not out of context. It sauid
exactly as I claimed. If you are waiting 2 years for a test
ot proceedure that your doctor has already determined you
need, then you are waiting for treatment. That is not what
he
said. He made the direct statement that no one waits for
treatment.
I said that in your specific example, no one is waiting for
treatment. They are waiting for a specific test, while under
the continuing care of the physician, and receiving the
specific test sooner if it becomes essential to that care.
==================
Nope. What you said is that no one is waiting for treatment.
Yes, in response to your allegation that the people featured in
the story
were waiting for treatment. They aren't. And you are a scumbag
for taking my
statement out of that context and trying to say that I was
referring to all
persons in Canada.
You owe me an apology, but you are too weak and too big of a
coward to do
it.
=====================
Nope. Where's yours, liarman?
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Show Printable Version
Search this Thread
:
Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode
Switch to Threaded Mode
Posting Rules
Smilies
are
On
[IMG]
code is
Off
HTML code is
Off
Trackbacks
are
On
Pingbacks
are
On
Refbacks
are
On
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Crimes Against Nature-- RFK, Jr. Interview
W. Watson
General
0
November 14th 04
10:05 PM
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
11:49 PM
.
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
Contact Us
BoatBanter Home
Privacy Statement
Copyright © 2017
LinkBack
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks