"KMAN" wrote in message
. ..

"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Tinkerntom" wrote in message
ups.com...

KMAN wrote:

snip...


rick, I would encourage you to allow KMAN to modify and
clarify his
previous statement inasmuch as he has acknowledged that it is
not what
he meant to say, and then if desired, discuss that as a new
issue.
=====================
He has already modified his ststement. After he was caught in
his lie. the ststement was not out of context. It sauid
exactly as I claimed. If you are waiting 2 years for a test
ot proceedure that your doctor has already determined you
need, then you are waiting for treatment. That is not what he
said. He made the direct statement that no one waits for
treatment.

I said that in your specific example, no one is waiting for
treatment. They are waiting for a specific test, while under
the continuing care of the physician, and receiving the
specific test sooner if it becomes essential to that care.
==================
Nope. What you said is that no one is waiting for treatment.
Your next sentence indeed seperates treatment from tests,
which makes you statement that no one is waiting for trewatment
even more a lie.


You are being deliberately dishonest and you know it. You are a
scumbag.
===============
No, you are a liar that just can't help himself.

besides, the proof has been presented that Canadians even die
waiting for the treatment that you said they don't wait for.

in article et, rick at
wrote on 3/2/05 5:42 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
. ..

"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Tinkerntom" wrote in message
ups.com...

KMAN wrote:

snip...


rick, I would encourage you to allow KMAN to modify and
clarify his
previous statement inasmuch as he has acknowledged that it is
not what
he meant to say, and then if desired, discuss that as a new
issue.
=====================
He has already modified his ststement. After he was caught in
his lie. the ststement was not out of context. It sauid
exactly as I claimed. If you are waiting 2 years for a test
ot proceedure that your doctor has already determined you
need, then you are waiting for treatment. That is not what he
said. He made the direct statement that no one waits for
treatment.

I said that in your specific example, no one is waiting for
treatment. They are waiting for a specific test, while under
the continuing care of the physician, and receiving the
specific test sooner if it becomes essential to that care.
==================
Nope. What you said is that no one is waiting for treatment.

Yes, in response to your allegation that the people featured in the story
were waiting for treatment. They aren't. And you are a scumbag for taking my
statement out of that context and trying to say that I was referring to all
persons in Canada.

You owe me an apology, but you are too weak and too big of a coward to do
it.

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 3/2/05 5:42 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
. ..

"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Tinkerntom" wrote in message
ups.com...

KMAN wrote:

snip...


rick, I would encourage you to allow KMAN to modify and
clarify his
previous statement inasmuch as he has acknowledged that it
is
not what
he meant to say, and then if desired, discuss that as a new
issue.
=====================
He has already modified his ststement. After he was caught
in
his lie. the ststement was not out of context. It sauid
exactly as I claimed. If you are waiting 2 years for a test
ot proceedure that your doctor has already determined you
need, then you are waiting for treatment. That is not what
he
said. He made the direct statement that no one waits for
treatment.

I said that in your specific example, no one is waiting for
treatment. They are waiting for a specific test, while under
the continuing care of the physician, and receiving the
specific test sooner if it becomes essential to that care.
==================
Nope. What you said is that no one is waiting for treatment.

Yes, in response to your allegation that the people featured in
the story
were waiting for treatment. They aren't. And you are a scumbag
for taking my
statement out of that context and trying to say that I was
referring to all
persons in Canada.

You owe me an apology, but you are too weak and too big of a
coward to do
it.
=====================
Nope. Where's yours, liarman?