Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25-Feb-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:
Could it be that humans were intended to evolve while sharks weren't? There is no evidence of intention. So, you agree that it could be an episodic change. I agree with you? You keep making up things and hope you get something right. You _still_ haven't posted any reference to a scientific theory of evolution that resembles the nonsense you are spewing. Indeed. But what about Homo Sapien's precursor primate species that didn't. Changing the discussion from morphology to something else? Trying to avoid the fact that you don't know what you're talking about? Ah, yes, "observation." You mean like the scientific observation that the world is flat? How about the scientific observation that "atoms" are the smallest form of matter? Or the scientific observation that the sun revolves around the earth? So, you don't understand the scientific method at all. Those bits of information have all been superceded. And for the record, the scientific community never held much for a flat earth - that was the religious nutcase view. Any natural philosopher would have known about Eratosthenes' measurements to deduce the circumference of the earth. Ditto Aristarchus and his observations of the earth going around the sun. Is ignorance one of your specialties? Some time ago, your "scientists" believed wholesale that Galileo, Newton and even Archimedes were deluded fools. Proof? Galileo was a widely respected natural philosopher, even among the members of the Catholic Church. That's why he was treated so well during his inquisition. Newton was the Lucasian chair of Mathematics and was so well respected by his peers that he was believed to be correct even when he was not. Archimedes was also a well respected philosopher - the cartoon version of him as a crazy man running around in a towel yelling "Eureka" has nothing to do with historical reality. You have nothing to do with historical or present reality either. You implicitly reject the existence of God not because God has been scientifically disproven Why do you continue to lie about this? Provide a single quote where I have said that God does not exist. The fact that you can't deal with any discussion without lying and misrepresenting the truth proves that you are an idiot. Clearly you are threatened by my arguments. Clearly you are delusional. Mike |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crimes Against Nature-- RFK, Jr. Interview | General |