| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
A Usenet persona calling itself Wilko wrote:
Wilko P.S. I'm still laughing because of the image of a bunch of fat, out of shape middle aged men with shotguns, pistols and hunting rifles trying to take on well trained troops with fully automatic weapons, grenade lauchers, tanks, helicopter gunships and all kinds of sophisticated weaponry bought with the tax that those old men paid. Not only would the U.S. version of the secret police probably pick up most of them before they could fire a shot, Well, that's impossible because we do not have a "secret police" force and we take great pains to ensure that even the local police do not have access to what records might exist on who owns what arms. That's the point of the 2nd Amendment. There are more than 300 million guns in private ownership in the US, and the government has pretty much no idea whatsoever where the bulk of those guns are or who has them. That's not a flaw in our system, it's a feature specifically intended by the Framers. but half of them would probably die of heart attacks if they had to run 100 yards to cover. Maybe. But then again, if even 50 million fat men with guns manage to kill only one soldier apiece (not difficult at all, particularly if you're willing to die in the process) we win, because the other feature of our government is that we deliberately limit our standing army to levels that cannot threaten the liberty of the people. And even the issue of the National Guard and state guard forces has been carefully thought out by the Framers. They said, and rightfully so, that a local militia force, under locally-elected officers, would be unlikely to agree to march to another state to impose martial rule. That's why National Guard commanders are not appointed by the federal government, but are selected by the Guard units themselves, ratified by the Governor. In the unlikely event that a demogog attempts a coup in the US, it is almost impossible to get the bulk of citizen-soldiers in the various guard units to go along with orders from Washington to violate the Constitution and oppress the local citizenry...because the guard troops ARE the local citizenry and they will simply refuse such orders. Indeed, they are far more likely to refuse such illegal orders from Washington and then organize with other state guard units to attack local federal troop concentrations and invade Washington to put down the tyrant. Even supposing federal soldiers seized all National Guard arms prior to declaring martial law nationwide, our federal army is not large enough to control the population...deliberately so...and the National Guard can be re-armed with weapons *from civilians* that would make them an effective fighting force against usurping federal troops. This is particularly true because a would-be tyrant cannot afford to simply carpet-bomb the very cities and populations he's trying to take control of, so the war becomes a guerilla war waged by grunts in the field, not high-tech standoff munitions. Nah, I don't see that citizen uprising with privately owned weapons happen... ever! :-) That's what makes you a slave...the slave mentality. That was proven by your nation's collaboration with the Nazis in WWII. Unless you're willing to die to protect your freedoms, you don't deserve your freedoms. On the other hand, at need, I have sufficient arms to arm at least three soldiers with effective military battle rifles, along with a basic ammunition load for each, while still having plenty of precision, long-range weapons for my own use. I guarantee you that even if I can't dash a hundred yards in 10 seconds, I can hit a human-sized target at ranges out to one thousand yards with at least an 80% probability. Soon, I'll be extending that effective range to closer to 1500 yards for humans and 2000 yards for materials, with a somewhat smaller hit probability but a much wider target destruction capability that includes unarmored and lightly-armored vehicles and other equipment. Should I be called upon to defend the Constitution and the nation, I guarantee to take out at least one enemy soldier before they even know I'm there, and probably several more before they can take me, if in fact they can. There are a lot of people just like me out there...enough to ensure that any invasion or attempt to overthrow our government is doomed to failure, even without the cooperation of the National Guard. You are free to disbelieve me if you like, but I'd recommend that you avoid serving in the UN forces should it decide to try to take over America, if you wish to survive. Remember the advice of military experts about underestimating your enemy. I would like to fill you in on an interesting bit of unknown military history. Back in the mid-70s, commanders of the Special Forces decided to do some training in the northern part of Florida, near Jacksonville. They decided to stage a training mission that called for a large group of special forces personnel to "invade" the area around the Okeefenokee Swamp. They invited local residents to participate as OPFORs (Opposing Forces) to oppose the beach landing and infiltration. The locals were supplied with M-16's and MILES gear, but otherwise they provided all their own equipment and transportation. All they were told was that a landing would be taking place somewhere within a specified area of beach. To make a long story short, the locals wiped out the SF troopies. Kicked their asses right back into the ocean, to the massive embarrassment of the brass. It made the papers all over Florida, and I heard about it in college in Daytona Beach. Since then, no military training exercise has ever used local civilians as OPFORS. So, discount the abilities of US citizens to defend their country at your peril. -- Regards, Scott Weiser "I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM © 2005 Scott Weiser |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Crimes Against Nature-- RFK, Jr. Interview | General | |||