| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 13:52:25 -0500, "Scented Nectar"
wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:49:34 -0500, "Scented Nectar" wrote: Could you guys please delete rec.boats from your cross posting list? That would be nice. Thank you. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes Sorry about that. One of the resident trolls in the vegetarian groups cross posted to an off topic group. I'll snip it from my future replies to this troll. Thanks, man, you're an angel! John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 18:59:23 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Scented Nectar wrote: It's not "for" "vegans". It's for everyone. I just know how "vegans" will respond to about 80% of the statements. I'm not 100% vegan yet. You'll never be "vegan", because ethics has no meaning to you. I don't feel like taking that test. Fear. The quiz is open to one and all. But you're not pestering one and all, just me. Because you're the only one being a chicken**** about it. And the others are...where? Not taking the test either as far as I can see. No one seems to want to take the test. People have taken the test. Others did take the test when it was posted in alt.food.vegan before. So then you already have your test answers. Not yours. Do you have any reason to believe it would turn out different results to do the test over? There's a different cast of characters in alt.food.vegan now. You are the ONLY one who has demonstrated deep, irrational fear over it. You are hoping that by accusing me of fear, that I will take the test just to prove you wrong. No, I know you'd never take the test in any circumstance. The reason is fear. Rudy, could you be so kind as to remove rec.boats from the list of sites you're cross posting this thread to? We'd appreciate it, for sure. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
In article et,
Rudy Canoza wrote: Scented Nectar wrote: You're lying. You have no intention of taking the quiz, because you're afraid - deeply and irrationally afraid. If around a hundred other veg*ns took the test, I might want to see how I compare, depending on my curiosity. You're afraid. All your "reasons" are weak excuses. You're just deeply afraid. It's not fear. It's fear: deep, irrational, paralyzing fear. No. Yes. It's just a refusal to do something I don't feel like doing. Because you're afraid. More manipulation. You do get an A for effort. |
uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult
engagement and wrote: In article et, Rudy Canoza wrote: Scented Nectar wrote: You're lying. You have no intention of taking the quiz, because you're afraid - deeply and irrationally afraid. If around a hundred other veg*ns took the test, I might want to see how I compare, depending on my curiosity. You're afraid. All your "reasons" are weak excuses. You're just deeply afraid. It's not fear. It's fear: deep, irrational, paralyzing fear. No. Yes. It's just a refusal to do something I don't feel like doing. Because you're afraid. More manipulation. No manipulation, kid. |
"You'll be a much nicer person once yo=ADu come out
of the closet. " .. HAHAHAHAHA!!! He doesn't dare "come out" for fear of dragging Rudy/Bunghole ~jonnie~ out with him...........and ~jonnie~ (in spite of all his queerness) ain't ready. LOL! |
In article t,
Rudy Canoza wrote: uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult engagement and wrote: In article et, Rudy Canoza wrote: Scented Nectar wrote: You're lying. You have no intention of taking the quiz, because you're afraid - deeply and irrationally afraid. If around a hundred other veg*ns took the test, I might want to see how I compare, depending on my curiosity. You're afraid. All your "reasons" are weak excuses. You're just deeply afraid. It's not fear. It's fear: deep, irrational, paralyzing fear. No. Yes. It's just a refusal to do something I don't feel like doing. Because you're afraid. More manipulation. No manipulation, kid. Hmmm. Okay. Please define manipulation and provide an example of manipulation. |
|
uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult
engagement and wrote: In article t, Rudy Canoza wrote: uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult engagement and wrote: It's not fear. It's fear: deep, irrational, paralyzing fear. No. Yes. It's just a refusal to do something I don't feel like doing. Because you're afraid. More manipulation. No manipulation, kid. Hmmm. Okay. Please define manipulation and provide an example of manipulation. No. YOU define it. It's your false claim, so get busy. |
"JohnH" wrote Rudy, could you be so kind as to remove rec.boats from the list of sites you're cross posting this thread to? We'd appreciate it, for sure. John H John I understand your frustration, but can't you simply kill the thread in your newsreader? The problem with your suggestion is that you have presumed to speak for every single person reading rec.boats, and I am sure that some of them have a few interests other than boats. |
uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult
engagement and wrote: In article , Rudy Canoza wrote: uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult engagement and wrote: More manipulation. No manipulation, kid. Hmmm. Okay. Please define manipulation and provide an example of manipulation. No. YOU define it. It's your false claim, so get busy. I defined manipulation You didn't. Ah, you still want to communicate with me. Why did you **** your grandfather in the ass for three days after he was dead, Ron? Did you have an illicit key to the funeral home? |
In article et,
Rudy Canoza wrote: uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult engagement and wrote: In article , Rudy Canoza wrote: uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult engagement and wrote: More manipulation. No manipulation, kid. Hmmm. Okay. Please define manipulation and provide an example of manipulation. No. YOU define it. It's your false claim, so get busy. I defined manipulation You didn't. Ah, you still want to communicate with me. Why did you **** your grandfather in the ass for three days after he was dead, Ron? Did you have an illicit key to the funeral home? More preoccupation with gay sex. I must say that I find you highly sexualized which is also indicative of the sexually abused and the sexually repressed. |
uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult
engagement and wrote: In article et, Rudy Canoza wrote: uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult engagement and wrote: Hmmm. Okay. Please define manipulation and provide an example of manipulation. No. YOU define it. It's your false claim, so get busy. I defined manipulation You didn't. Ah, you still want to communicate with me. Why did you **** your grandfather in the ass for three days after he was dead, Ron? Did you have an illicit key to the funeral home? More preoccupation No preoccupation. |
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:27:04 -0800, "Dutch" wrote:
"JohnH" wrote Rudy, could you be so kind as to remove rec.boats from the list of sites you're cross posting this thread to? We'd appreciate it, for sure. John H John I understand your frustration, but can't you simply kill the thread in your newsreader? The problem with your suggestion is that you have presumed to speak for every single person reading rec.boats, and I am sure that some of them have a few interests other than boats. Yes, of course you're probably right. I'm sure there is at least one person in rec.boats who wants to know which of you, Rudy, and Ron are queer for the other. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:27:04 -0800, "Dutch" wrote: "JohnH" wrote Rudy, could you be so kind as to remove rec.boats from the list of sites you're cross posting this thread to? We'd appreciate it, for sure. John H John I understand your frustration, but can't you simply kill the thread in your newsreader? The problem with your suggestion is that you have presumed to speak for every single person reading rec.boats, and I am sure that some of them have a few interests other than boats. Yes, of course you're probably right. I'm sure there is at least one person in rec.boats who wants to know which of you, Rudy, and Ron are queer for the other. There you go... |
In article , "Dutch"
wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:27:04 -0800, "Dutch" wrote: "JohnH" wrote Rudy, could you be so kind as to remove rec.boats from the list of sites you're cross posting this thread to? We'd appreciate it, for sure. John H John I understand your frustration, but can't you simply kill the thread in your newsreader? The problem with your suggestion is that you have presumed to speak for every single person reading rec.boats, and I am sure that some of them have a few interests other than boats. Yes, of course you're probably right. I'm sure there is at least one person in rec.boats who wants to know which of you, Rudy, and Ron are queer for the other. There you go... Anything from the eating disordered is suspect. Denial is a terrible symptom of any disorder. "Hi, I'm Dutch. I have an eating disorder." |
On 31 Jan 2005 04:15:57 GMT, (LaBomba182) wrote:
Subject: Scented plays no questionaire game. From: "Dutch" The problem with your suggestion is that you have presumed to speak for every single person reading rec.boats, and I am sure that some of them have a few interests other than boats. Yeah, like we need your bull ****, bush league flame wars. We've got Harry v. JohnH, Karen, Tuuk, etc. Big time, high brow, adult stuff. Just look at the high quality banter contained in them! Now take you pansy assed flames and get out of our sand box. We don't poop in yours so stop pooping in ours! Capt. Bill Capt. Bill Wrong! You don't have Harry v JohnH. If you do it'll be one-sided as hell. Don't get me started again! :) John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
JohnH wrote: On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:27:04 -0800, "Dutch" wrote: "JohnH" wrote Rudy, could you be so kind as to remove rec.boats from the list of sites you're cross posting this thread to? We'd appreciate it, for sure. John H John I understand your frustration, but can't you simply kill the thread in your newsreader? The problem with your suggestion is that you have presumed to speak for every single person reading rec.boats, and I am sure that some of them have a few interests other than boats. Yes, of course you're probably right. I'm sure there is at least one person in rec.boats who wants to know which of you, Rudy, and Ron are queer for the other. John H Man, are you drinking again? You've gone way over the edge, now your acting homophobic. |
Subject: Scented plays no questionaire game.
From: JohnH Wrong! You don't have Harry v JohnH. If you do it'll be one-sided as hell. Don't get me started again! :) John H Well, we did at the time I wrote that. :-) Good on ya for refilling your dumpster. Capt. Bill |
"Ron" wrote in message ... In article , "Dutch" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:27:04 -0800, "Dutch" wrote: "JohnH" wrote Rudy, could you be so kind as to remove rec.boats from the list of sites you're cross posting this thread to? We'd appreciate it, for sure. John H John I understand your frustration, but can't you simply kill the thread in your newsreader? The problem with your suggestion is that you have presumed to speak for every single person reading rec.boats, and I am sure that some of them have a few interests other than boats. Yes, of course you're probably right. I'm sure there is at least one person in rec.boats who wants to know which of you, Rudy, and Ron are queer for the other. There you go... Anything from the eating disordered is suspect. Denial is a terrible symptom of any disorder. "Hi, I'm Dutch. I have an eating disorder." Did I hurt your iddy-biddy feelings somewhere, is that it? Does he need a big hug? |
In article , "Dutch"
wrote: "Ron" wrote in message ... In article , "Dutch" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:27:04 -0800, "Dutch" wrote: "JohnH" wrote Rudy, could you be so kind as to remove rec.boats from the list of sites you're cross posting this thread to? We'd appreciate it, for sure. John H John I understand your frustration, but can't you simply kill the thread in your newsreader? The problem with your suggestion is that you have presumed to speak for every single person reading rec.boats, and I am sure that some of them have a few interests other than boats. Yes, of course you're probably right. I'm sure there is at least one person in rec.boats who wants to know which of you, Rudy, and Ron are queer for the other. There you go... Anything from the eating disordered is suspect. Denial is a terrible symptom of any disorder. "Hi, I'm Dutch. I have an eating disorder." Did I hurt your iddy-biddy feelings somewhere, is that it? Does he need a big hug? How could *you* hurt *my* feelings? I think you overestimate your impact on me. |
"Ron" wrote in message ... In article , "Dutch" wrote: "Ron" wrote in message ... In article , "Dutch" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:27:04 -0800, "Dutch" wrote: "JohnH" wrote Rudy, could you be so kind as to remove rec.boats from the list of sites you're cross posting this thread to? We'd appreciate it, for sure. John H John I understand your frustration, but can't you simply kill the thread in your newsreader? The problem with your suggestion is that you have presumed to speak for every single person reading rec.boats, and I am sure that some of them have a few interests other than boats. Yes, of course you're probably right. I'm sure there is at least one person in rec.boats who wants to know which of you, Rudy, and Ron are queer for the other. There you go... Anything from the eating disordered is suspect. Denial is a terrible symptom of any disorder. "Hi, I'm Dutch. I have an eating disorder." Did I hurt your iddy-biddy feelings somewhere, is that it? Does he need a big hug? How could *you* hurt *my* feelings? I think you overestimate your impact on me. My estimate is based on clear evidence, your obsessive dogging of my tracks attempting to find holes in my arguments. You have been trying for a couple of weeks, ever since I rebuffed your first attempts convince me I was bullying SN. |
In article , "Dutch"
wrote: "Ron" wrote in message ... In article , "Dutch" wrote: "Ron" wrote in message ... In article , "Dutch" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:27:04 -0800, "Dutch" wrote: "JohnH" wrote Rudy, could you be so kind as to remove rec.boats from the list of sites you're cross posting this thread to? We'd appreciate it, for sure. John H John I understand your frustration, but can't you simply kill the thread in your newsreader? The problem with your suggestion is that you have presumed to speak for every single person reading rec.boats, and I am sure that some of them have a few interests other than boats. Yes, of course you're probably right. I'm sure there is at least one person in rec.boats who wants to know which of you, Rudy, and Ron are queer for the other. There you go... Anything from the eating disordered is suspect. Denial is a terrible symptom of any disorder. "Hi, I'm Dutch. I have an eating disorder." Did I hurt your iddy-biddy feelings somewhere, is that it? Does he need a big hug? How could *you* hurt *my* feelings? I think you overestimate your impact on me. My estimate is based on clear evidence, your obsessive dogging of my tracks attempting to find holes in my arguments. You have been trying for a couple of weeks, ever since I rebuffed your first attempts convince me I was bullying SN. Once again, you overestimate your impact on me. I choose to participate here because I choose it. I choose it for a variety of reasons. That you make yourself the centre of my world is your choice. We may be making headway in that you do seem to recognize that SN was being bullied. Acknowledging that would be difficult, I imagine. |
"Ron" wrote
Anything from the eating disordered is suspect. Denial is a terrible symptom of any disorder. "Hi, I'm Dutch. I have an eating disorder." Did I hurt your iddy-biddy feelings somewhere, is that it? Does he need a big hug? How could *you* hurt *my* feelings? I think you overestimate your impact on me. My estimate is based on clear evidence, your obsessive dogging of my tracks attempting to find holes in my arguments. You have been trying for a couple of weeks, ever since I rebuffed your first attempts convince me I was bullying SN. Once again, you overestimate your impact on me. I choose to participate here because I choose it. That is tautological. I choose it for a variety of reasons. That is avoidance. That you make yourself the centre of my world is your choice. The replies are TO ME. We may be making headway in that you do seem to recognize that SN was being bullied. Acknowledging that would be difficult, I imagine. Again, you cannot resolve your insistence that people be left to their own devices with your intervention in this case of so-called "bullying". SN is clearly a voluntary participant or she would simply killfile the threads. Such inconsistency is a signal that your thinking lacks a solid foundation. I referred to it before as a failure to operate from your genuine self. |
In article , "Dutch"
wrote: "Ron" wrote Anything from the eating disordered is suspect. Denial is a terrible symptom of any disorder. "Hi, I'm Dutch. I have an eating disorder." Did I hurt your iddy-biddy feelings somewhere, is that it? Does he need a big hug? How could *you* hurt *my* feelings? I think you overestimate your impact on me. My estimate is based on clear evidence, your obsessive dogging of my tracks attempting to find holes in my arguments. You have been trying for a couple of weeks, ever since I rebuffed your first attempts convince me I was bullying SN. Once again, you overestimate your impact on me. I choose to participate here because I choose it. That is tautological. I choose it for a variety of reasons. That is avoidance. That you make yourself the centre of my world is your choice. The replies are TO ME. We may be making headway in that you do seem to recognize that SN was being bullied. Acknowledging that would be difficult, I imagine. Again, you cannot resolve your insistence that people be left to their own devices with your intervention in this case of so-called "bullying". SN is clearly a voluntary participant or she would simply killfile the threads. Such inconsistency is a signal that your thinking lacks a solid foundation. I referred to it before as a failure to operate from your genuine self. Wrong. She has clearly asked that she not be treated this way. Her request has been ignored. she has clearly stated that she chooses to be in this group to discuss other issues and not to be verbally abused. The bullies just refuse to do what she wants. Her choice is to participate in the group. It is coincidence that others are acting in this way towards her. 4 bullies picking one person is just cowardice. Control freaks unite. Before you misconstrue my intent, you have stated that denial needs to be addressed. Feel free to continue to be abusive to SN, but I did want to address your denial. |
"Ron" wrote in message ... In article , "Dutch" wrote: "Ron" wrote Anything from the eating disordered is suspect. Denial is a terrible symptom of any disorder. "Hi, I'm Dutch. I have an eating disorder." Did I hurt your iddy-biddy feelings somewhere, is that it? Does he need a big hug? How could *you* hurt *my* feelings? I think you overestimate your impact on me. My estimate is based on clear evidence, your obsessive dogging of my tracks attempting to find holes in my arguments. You have been trying for a couple of weeks, ever since I rebuffed your first attempts convince me I was bullying SN. Once again, you overestimate your impact on me. I choose to participate here because I choose it. That is tautological. I choose it for a variety of reasons. That is avoidance. That you make yourself the centre of my world is your choice. The replies are TO ME. We may be making headway in that you do seem to recognize that SN was being bullied. Acknowledging that would be difficult, I imagine. Again, you cannot resolve your insistence that people be left to their own devices with your intervention in this case of so-called "bullying". SN is clearly a voluntary participant or she would simply killfile the threads. Such inconsistency is a signal that your thinking lacks a solid foundation. I referred to it before as a failure to operate from your genuine self. Wrong. She has clearly asked that she not be treated this way. Her request has been ignored. she has clearly stated that she chooses to be in this group to discuss other issues and not to be verbally abused. The bullies just refuse to do what she wants. Her actions betray her words. She know how to use a killfile. She is getting a kick out of it. Her choice is to participate in the group. It is coincidence that others are acting in this way towards her. It is no coincidence that she continues to respond, and fails to killfile any of these so-called bullies. 4 bullies picking one person is just cowardice. Control freaks unite. Before you misconstrue my intent, you have stated that denial needs to be addressed. Feel free to continue to be abusive to SN, but I did want to address your denial. She loves the attention, and you are falling for it as much as any of us. |
In article , "Dutch"
wrote: "Ron" wrote in message ... In article , "Dutch" wrote: "Ron" wrote Anything from the eating disordered is suspect. Denial is a terrible symptom of any disorder. "Hi, I'm Dutch. I have an eating disorder." Did I hurt your iddy-biddy feelings somewhere, is that it? Does he need a big hug? How could *you* hurt *my* feelings? I think you overestimate your impact on me. My estimate is based on clear evidence, your obsessive dogging of my tracks attempting to find holes in my arguments. You have been trying for a couple of weeks, ever since I rebuffed your first attempts convince me I was bullying SN. Once again, you overestimate your impact on me. I choose to participate here because I choose it. That is tautological. I choose it for a variety of reasons. That is avoidance. That you make yourself the centre of my world is your choice. The replies are TO ME. We may be making headway in that you do seem to recognize that SN was being bullied. Acknowledging that would be difficult, I imagine. Again, you cannot resolve your insistence that people be left to their own devices with your intervention in this case of so-called "bullying". SN is clearly a voluntary participant or she would simply killfile the threads. Such inconsistency is a signal that your thinking lacks a solid foundation. I referred to it before as a failure to operate from your genuine self. Wrong. She has clearly asked that she not be treated this way. Her request has been ignored. she has clearly stated that she chooses to be in this group to discuss other issues and not to be verbally abused. The bullies just refuse to do what she wants. Her actions betray her words. She know how to use a killfile. She is getting a kick out of it. Her choice is to participate in the group. It is coincidence that others are acting in this way towards her. It is no coincidence that she continues to respond, and fails to killfile any of these so-called bullies. 4 bullies picking one person is just cowardice. Control freaks unite. Before you misconstrue my intent, you have stated that denial needs to be addressed. Feel free to continue to be abusive to SN, but I did want to address your denial. She loves the attention, and you are falling for it as much as any of us. SO-CALLED. Are you a ****ing air head. Whether she stays, goes or killfiles, the actions are still those of bullies. Man, what a ****-tard. |
"Ron" wrote
She loves the attention, and you are falling for it as much as any of us. SO-CALLED. Are you a ****ing air head. Whether she stays, goes or killfiles, the actions are still those of bullies. Man, what a ****-tard. Nope, not bullying. She's an adult participating voluntarily. |
In article , "Dutch"
wrote: "Ron" wrote She loves the attention, and you are falling for it as much as any of us. SO-CALLED. Are you a ****ing air head. Whether she stays, goes or killfiles, the actions are still those of bullies. Man, what a ****-tard. Nope, not bullying. She's an adult participating voluntarily. ****tard. Participation in bullying is still bullying. Voluntary or involuntary participation in bullying is still bullying. ****ing flawed reject. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:44 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com