On 3 Feb 2005 07:48:19 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


Harry Krause wrote:
basskisser wrote:
JohnH wrote:

On 2 Feb 2005 08:06:34 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On 1 Feb 2005 06:19:34 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"



wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"



wrote:



Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error,

then

please

post

where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam",

as

you

have

stated.

Did he not say that?

John H


Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise?

After

all,

you

are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his

Vietnam

activities many months ago. Did you check back that far?

Maybe

you

read it and forgot.

John H

The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one

who

made

the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H


I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU stated

that

he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

Hell, if you don't know what he said, ask him. He's probably

around

somewhere.

John H

Again, John, I know what he said. The fact remains, YOU stated
that

he

said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You presented this as
fact. Prove it. If you can't, then you either lied, or were

erroneous.

Which is it?

Prove what he said.

John H


Man, are you for real? Are you really THAT uncapable of following a
thread that YOU initiated? Okay, let's try again, perhaps you will
understand.
YOU, John, stated that Harry had said in the past that he
"identified
bodies in VietNam". So, you attributed a quote to Harry. Prove
that.
I didn't attribute ANY quote to Harry. I simply stated that he
didn't
say what YOU attributed to him. Seeing that YOU initiated a post
that
stated that Harry had said he "identified bodies in VietNam", the
burden of proof is on you. Now, you could always admit you posted
that
in ignorance, not knowing WHAT Harry had said regarding that
subject.



Wouldn't it be easier to simply accept the fact that Herring sees
what
he wants to see and reads what he wants to read, and forms
conclusions
that have very little to do with the information presented?

You're beating a dead horse here. Just let it go.

So true! He's so narrow minded that even if you ask the question, he
doesn't see it...

I thought you were asking *me* for help! Now I see you've gotten
someone else involved. How many different answers are you looking for?

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes