JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
news On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



JohnH wrote:


Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The
identification of
remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause
stated he was
not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even
know
what one
is).

The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility.
He
is
a liar.
There are other examples. Search for yourself if you
missed
them.

John H


No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said
I
was
part of
a
group that helped locate them, *start* an
indentification
process, and
arrange for retrieval.

Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll
probably
stumble across the name of the outfit for which I
worked.


You're a liar, Krause.

John H

You're a pathetic failure.


Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed
than
attempted
nothing and lied about it.

You're a ****ing liar, Krause.

John H


You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in
life,
got
drafted, and stayed in the Army.

You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad
not
to
held
highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible
and
necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him
and
move on.
No need wasting more time with the fool.


I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to
every
post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is,
"You're a
****ing liar, Krause."

He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes
out.
He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if
it's
just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar.

He is *worthy* of that comment.

[Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a
Krause
post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything
meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion.
He
is
a
liar.]

John H

Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he
"identified bodies" in VietNam.

You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad you've
finally unplugged your head and seen the light.


John H

John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone said
something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was a
liar?

Someone who made an "error" would recant their story, a liar would not.