"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
news
Bert Robbins wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Bert Robbins wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...



Bert Robbins wrote:



Deriliction of duty is not erased by saving a crew member.

The loss of the PT-109 sits squarely on Kennedy's shoulders and he
is responsible for its sinking.

This from a buttwiper whose most dangerous military duty was swabbing
out the head.


At least I served my country unlike you who spits on it anytime you
can.





I served my country, in a time of war, and in a war zone. I had two
jobs in Vietnam, the first having to do with an agricultural
"pacification" program, and the second having to do with the location,
initial identification and recovery of soldiers who bought it. Both
duties were at least 1000 per cent more hazardous than your time
swabbing out heads.
Well, maybe not...you obviously were negatively impacted by your mop
time.


You didn't serve you did a job.


Really? Which definition of "serve" do you not understand?

s3;v) [a. OF. (and F.) serv-ir:—L. servWre to be a servant or slave, to
serve, f. serv-us slave, servant. Cf. Pr. servir, sirvir, Sp., Pg.
servir, It. servire.


You still didn't serve, you did a job. But, that is a strech because you
will not state your job title and they agency that employed you.


Not too adept with words and their meanings, eh?

Sometime in the past I stated the name of the person for whom I worked
while I served my country. Any person of normal intelligence who was
interested would have been able to reach the correct answer in 10 seconds
or less.

I still make more money than you do!

State your job title, the agency (if you can figure out the meaning of
agency) you worked for and the dates you were in Vietnam.