|
Why some left coasters think they are moderates...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... GAZ wrote: Joel Connelly was interviewed by O"Rielly. O'Reilly? The right-wing asshole's asshole. The FDA ought to run a warning crawl under his TV show... "Watching this will rot whatever little remains of your brain..." What is it like living in that strange world of yours where *everyone* who disagrees with you politically is an asshole? I have yet to find another person as closed minded and bigoted as you Harry. Your world must be awfully lonely. |
Why some left coasters think they are moderates...
On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 19:30:50 -0500, John H wrote:
On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 22:04:40 GMT, Joe Parsons wrote: On 9 Jan 2004 13:00:59 -0800, (Backyard Renegade) wrote: So why are left coast libs so hateful and out of touch, easy, cause they are being lied to by the same self serving folks who have been running the media for the last 50 years. What makes you believe that those who live in any particular area of the country receive information only from regional sources? Joe Parsons Without being pro or con re Backyard's statement, I am wondering why you asked the question you did. Saying, "...the same self serving folks who have been running the media for the last 50 years" doesn't imply information is received only from local sources. I think it does. From the subject of his post, he is talking about "left (west) libs," not the "libs" he so scorns from other areas of the country. Joe Parsons |
Why some left coasters think they are moderates...
Harry Krause wrote in message ...
GAZ wrote: Joel Connelly was interviewed by O"Rielly. O'Reilly? The right-wing asshole's asshole. The FDA ought to run a warning crawl under his TV show... "Watching this will rot whatever little remains of your brain..." The fact is, the guy as good as admitted to dishonest reporting but of course none of you has anything to say about that. I guess to you, lies are kinda' like air to the rest of us.. |
Why some left coasters think they are moderates...
Harry Krause wrote in message ...
GAZ wrote: Joel Connelly was interviewed by O"Rielly. O'Reilly? The right-wing asshole's asshole. The FDA ought to run a warning crawl under his TV show... "Watching this will rot whatever little remains of your brain..." You know harry, for someone who thinks they are so smart, you are awfully narrow minded. How can you even pretend to have a fair opinion when you refuse to even consider the opposition on any subject. Seems to me you must have led one of those sheltered kind of limosine lives where there was never any oppostion or accountability for ones actions and words to think the way you do. Sometimes in conversation folks say they hope folks like you actually have to work for a living one day or stand up for themselves, I usually hope they don't. I hate to see anyone suffer, no matter how wreched they are. |
Why some left coasters think they are moderates...
"GAZ" wrote in message ...
Joel Connelly was interviewed by O"Rielly. Yes, that's the guy. Another Harry clone, not an honest bone in his fat little body. I find folks like him that would lie to the public about it's leader, lies that would intentionally turn a public against that leader, just to suit a personal agenda, to be among the most discusting vermin on earth. Just call Harry, Leonard... "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... OOOps... Sorry I was not taking notes, but now that I think of it I do beleive they said Oregon. I will look for the interview again. You can question my education, but to suggest that Fox would put in a "ringer" is just more change the subject bs... I didn't question your education. It wouldn't be the first time that somebody staged an interview. An interview in which the host just magically decimated his adversary. You said "Seattle." I don't know if the article ran or not, but as soon as I pointed out that I couldn't find it in the archives of our major daily papers- your memory improved and the reporter is now from "Oregon." I know you guys on the East Coast think everything west of the Mississippi river is compressed to a couple of hundred square miles, but it's still a fair jog from Seattle to "Believe They Said", Oregon. :-) I can accept that you saw an interview on Fox. The rest of the details are comparatively hazy. Guess we'll have to go ahead and allow "some left coasters" to be moderates, (since most probably are), until proven otherwise. |
Why some left coasters think they are moderates...
The fact is, the guy as good as admitted to dishonest reporting but of
course none of you has anything to say about that. I guess to you, lies are kinda' like air to the rest of us.. Tracking this thing down- It appears that the O'Reilly's debate victory was more apparent to Scotty than to O' Reilly. O'Reilly's website says, "Kudos to Joel Connelly for coming on the show to defend his column, which he claimed was "satircal" in nature." Wouldn't O'Reilly have been shouting from the rooftops if he got some evil, scheming, mind poisoning, liberal to admit "dishonest reporting"? http://www.billoreilly.com/pg/jsp/community/tvshow.jsp Plenty of room for a variety of opinions in the world. If Scotty thinks JC was trounced by O'Reilly, he's free to keep score anyway he chooses. |
Why some left coasters think they are moderates...
"Satircal in nature", yeah right. The dishonest part was that he
neglected to tell the folks he was reporting to that it was "satircal" and any of them would get a very negative opinion, based on half truths and dishonest framing of the article. Can't comment on the article, as I haven't been able to find a copy on line. (If you know where I can find a copy it would be interesting to see). A satirist doesn't start with a disclaimer: "The following work is a satire." The article may or may not be good satire. If it *is* good satire, there are people who might not read it carefully or who strive to represent the article in a certain light who will not recognize it. Good satire sneaks up on you......you begin reading it and then you finally realize that the author is just putting you on. Once you're clued in, the remainder of the article becomes particularly funny. . Are you guys all reading out of the same play book? No. The world is not comprised of a series of absolute stereotypes. (I know that isn't what you're sold by much of the right wing media, "libs this, all libs that, etc"), Everybody who disagrees with you, including the huge percentage of the country who have serious doubts about your beloved Bush, isn't guilty of treason and sedition. |
Why some left coasters think they are moderates...
|
Why some left coasters think they are moderates...
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... "Satircal in nature", yeah right. The dishonest part was that he neglected to tell the folks he was reporting to that it was "satircal" and any of them would get a very negative opinion, based on half truths and dishonest framing of the article. Can't comment on the article, as I haven't been able to find a copy on line. (If you know where I can find a copy it would be interesting to see). A satirist doesn't start with a disclaimer: "The following work is a satire." The article may or may not be good satire. If it *is* good satire, there are people who might not read it carefully or who strive to represent the article in a certain light who will not recognize it. Good satire sneaks up on you......you begin reading it and then you finally realize that the author is just putting you on. Once you're clued in, the remainder of the article becomes particularly funny. . Are you guys all reading out of the same play book? No. The world is not comprised of a series of absolute stereotypes. (I know that isn't what you're sold by much of the right wing media, "libs this, all libs that, etc"), Everybody who disagrees with you, including the huge percentage of the country who have serious doubts about your beloved Bush, isn't guilty of treason and sedition. A huge percentage have serious doubt about Bush? How about far less than a majority. According to the latest polls, anywhere from 54% to 64% of Americans approve of the way GWB is doing his job. http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm Sorry Chuck...the "huge percentage" is actually in favor of GWB. ;-) |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com