"JimH" wrote in message
news

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

JimH wrote:

Pssst....Bassy....this is the third time today you used the word
*validity*
in that same context.....the proper word to use would be
*credibility*, not
validity. Just a heads up.

Do you EVER get tired of being WRONG? Take special note of the 4th
meaning, the LOGICAL one, direct from dictionary.com:

val·id ( P ) Pronunciation Key (vld)
adj.
Well grounded; just: a valid objection.

Producing the desired results; efficacious: valid methods.

Having legal force; effective or binding: a valid title.

Logic.
Containing premises from which the conclusion may logically be derived:
a valid argument.
Correctly inferred or deduced from a premise: a valid conclusion.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

An argument can have validity. A point of view can have validity. A
point of objection can have validity. A person cannot have validity...a
person can have credibility though.

You are batting .000.

Try again.

He's just being a good little liebral......keeps beating a dead horse, and
keeps expecting different results.

Still the same result though.....he's the "King of the NG idiots"