JimH wrote:

Pssst....Bassy....this is the third time today you used the word
*validity*
in that same context.....the proper word to use would be
*credibility*, not
validity. Just a heads up.

Do you EVER get tired of being WRONG? Take special note of the 4th
meaning, the LOGICAL one, direct from dictionary.com:

val=B7id ( P ) Pronunciation Key (vld)
adj.
Well grounded; just: a valid objection.

Producing the desired results; efficacious: valid methods.

Having legal force; effective or binding: a valid title.

Logic.
Containing premises from which the conclusion may logically be derived:
a valid argument.
Correctly inferred or deduced from a premise: a valid conclusion.

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

JimH wrote:

Pssst....Bassy....this is the third time today you used the word
*validity*
in that same context.....the proper word to use would be
*credibility*, not
validity. Just a heads up.

Do you EVER get tired of being WRONG? Take special note of the 4th
meaning, the LOGICAL one, direct from dictionary.com:

val·id ( P ) Pronunciation Key (vld)
adj.
Well grounded; just: a valid objection.

Producing the desired results; efficacious: valid methods.

Having legal force; effective or binding: a valid title.

Logic.
Containing premises from which the conclusion may logically be derived:
a valid argument.
Correctly inferred or deduced from a premise: a valid conclusion.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

An argument can have validity. A point of view can have validity. A point
of objection can have validity. A person cannot have validity...a person
can have credibility though.

You are batting .000.

Try again.

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

JimH wrote:

Pssst....Bassy....this is the third time today you used the word
*validity*
in that same context.....the proper word to use would be
*credibility*, not
validity. Just a heads up.

Do you EVER get tired of being WRONG? Take special note of the 4th
meaning, the LOGICAL one, direct from dictionary.com:

val=B7id ( P ) Pronunciation Key (vld)
adj.
Well grounded; just: a valid objection.

Producing the desired results; efficacious: valid methods.

Having legal force; effective or binding: a valid title.

Logic.
Containing premises from which the conclusion may logically be
derived:
a valid argument.
Correctly inferred or deduced from a premise: a valid conclusion.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

An argument can have validity. A point of view can have validity.
A point
of objection can have validity. A person cannot have validity...a
person
can have credibility though.

You are batting .000.

Try again.

Please refer to the above from dictionary.com. Now, do you just happen
to see the part that says "well grounded"??? Now, do you ALSO happen to
see the part that says "effective"? In your eyes, you can't be
effective??????

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

JimH wrote:

Pssst....Bassy....this is the third time today you used the word
*validity*
in that same context.....the proper word to use would be
*credibility*, not
validity. Just a heads up.

Do you EVER get tired of being WRONG? Take special note of the 4th
meaning, the LOGICAL one, direct from dictionary.com:

val=B7id ( P ) Pronunciation Key (vld)
adj.
Well grounded; just: a valid objection.

Producing the desired results; efficacious: valid methods.

Having legal force; effective or binding: a valid title.

Logic.
Containing premises from which the conclusion may logically be
derived:
a valid argument.
Correctly inferred or deduced from a premise: a valid conclusion.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

An argument can have validity. A point of view can have validity.
A point
of objection can have validity. A person cannot have validity...a
person
can have credibility though.

You are batting .000.

Try again.

Oh, andI forgot, a person can't have "legal force"?????

"JimH" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

JimH wrote:

Pssst....Bassy....this is the third time today you used the word
*validity*
in that same context.....the proper word to use would be
*credibility*, not
validity. Just a heads up.

Do you EVER get tired of being WRONG? Take special note of the 4th
meaning, the LOGICAL one, direct from dictionary.com:

val·id ( P ) Pronunciation Key (vld)
adj.
Well grounded; just: a valid objection.

Producing the desired results; efficacious: valid methods.

Having legal force; effective or binding: a valid title.

Logic.
Containing premises from which the conclusion may logically be derived:
a valid argument.
Correctly inferred or deduced from a premise: a valid conclusion.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

An argument can have validity. A point of view can have validity. A
point of objection can have validity. A person cannot have validity...a
person can have credibility though.

You are batting .000.

Try again.

He's just being a good little liebral......keeps beating a dead horse, and
keeps expecting different results.

Still the same result though.....he's the "King of the NG idiots"

"Jim Carter" wrote in message
...

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
There's a wonderful example. Everyone has a roof over the heads, but
most of them leak. Everyone is equal in poverty. At least in a free
market government, the people who achieve can rise above it. In
socialist/communist nations, the achievers pay for the non-achievers
thereby discouraging anyone from achieving, as there are no extra
rewards for doing so.
Dave

Hi Dave: Have you ever been to Cuba or do you just listen to Bush's
propaganda about Cuba?

The houses there do not have leaky roofs any more than you have one.
Everyone is not in poverty there. Before you type your comments, get your
facts straight. There are new cars being purchased, just not American
ones.

I have been there. I have family that lives there for part of the year
and
have been doing so for more than 30 years.
Of course, life there could be better if the USA would lift the embargo.

Communism is a failure why should we support it?