Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 13:07:24 -0800, jps wrote:
In article , says... Clinton obviously scared the crap out of Saddam! Knowing that Clinton would come down hard, because he'd done so frequently, Saddam canceled all his WMD programs, destroyed everything associated therewith, and became a good boy. Clearly, that's exactly what happened. It was the sanctions that worked. So what stupid Konservative deduction is rolling around in that mostly empty head of yours? Evidently, Bush has no capacity to understand that sometimes things change even though you suspect otherwise. Clinton would have been smart enough to use contemporaneous information before he decided to invade. jps As I wrote something you find agreeable, I'm wondering why the name-calling? Did I call you anything disagreeable? Do you find the Harry Krause technique to be an effective tool? John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 16:11:42 -0800, jps wrote:
In article , says... On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 13:07:24 -0800, jps wrote: In article , says... Clinton obviously scared the crap out of Saddam! Knowing that Clinton would come down hard, because he'd done so frequently, Saddam canceled all his WMD programs, destroyed everything associated therewith, and became a good boy. Clearly, that's exactly what happened. It was the sanctions that worked. So what stupid Konservative deduction is rolling around in that mostly empty head of yours? Evidently, Bush has no capacity to understand that sometimes things change even though you suspect otherwise. Clinton would have been smart enough to use contemporaneous information before he decided to invade. jps As I wrote something you find agreeable, I'm wondering why the name-calling? Did I call you anything disagreeable? Do you find the Harry Krause technique to be an effective tool? Did I not recognize your tongue firmly implanted in your cheek? jps And that's cause for a Krause approach? John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 13:07:24 -0800, jps wrote: In article , says... Clinton obviously scared the crap out of Saddam! Knowing that Clinton would come down hard, because he'd done so frequently, Saddam canceled all his WMD programs, destroyed everything associated therewith, and became a good boy. Clearly, that's exactly what happened. It was the sanctions that worked. So what stupid Konservative deduction is rolling around in that mostly empty head of yours? Evidently, Bush has no capacity to understand that sometimes things change even though you suspect otherwise. Clinton would have been smart enough to use contemporaneous information before he decided to invade. jps As I wrote something you find agreeable, I'm wondering why the name-calling? Did I call you anything disagreeable? Do you find the Harry Krause technique to be an effective tool? John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes That is exactly why I killfiled the guy. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT-Not just about WMDs | General | |||
Canada has WMD's, Bush: Attack Soon! | General | |||
OT - WMDs located, Read it and weep, Booby! | ASA | |||
WMDs | ASA |