Steve,
Do you enjoy tweaking the mentally challenged?

"Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message
...
On 5 Aug 2003 03:49:40 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message
...
On 4 Aug 2003 04:29:15 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message
So why do you keep doing it? And why are you pointing that out with
this post? If you understood english you'd realize I didn't call
you a
name.

Steve

Didn't call me a name? Well, now, Steve, YOU said that name calling is
"so school girlish", correct?
Well, here, ya go, school girl!:

On 7/31/03 Shelikoff wrote:
Yup, you're the only stalker around here.

You STUPID IDIOT!!! I said why are you pointing that out with THIS
post! More proof you can't read and understand plain english.

Heehee!! Why would it make a difference WHAT post I was pointing that
out in? If it is indeed a fact, it would be a fact in ANY post. But,
you wouldn't understand that, right?

And you don't understand plain english. I asked why you replied that
way to THAT post, not to any post. You could have just as easily answer
it as above. But you're too stupid for that.

Now, I'll put back the post you replied to and your reply:

If you weren't such a danger to those around you due to your temper
and
frustrations, I'd think you were just a funny baffoon.

Name calling. That is SO school girlish.

Now again, I ask you, why are you pointing out name calling is SO
school
girlish in your reply to my post when I didn't call you a name in that
post? You really are a moron. There, now you can say name calling is
school girlish in your reply to this post and it'll at least make
sense,
you little baby.

It's incredibly difficult to believe someone as immature as you is
actually a PE. I'd love to hear you testify in court on some matter.
You'd break down, cry and babble like a little baby if the cross got
too
tough.

I've given expert witness in several courts. Made some pretty easy
money that way. And, Steve, you could NEVER get me to break down. You

Par for the course, you're wrong yet again. I already HAVE gotten you
to break down. What else would you call it when, because you can't
defend your position, you end up making threats to break necks? That
would go over wonderfully on the witness stand. You're just toooooo
damn easy. Any lawyer with half a brain would rip you apart.

on the other hand, apparently have some kind of mental condition that
makes you either have a need to think you are always correct (possibly
got beat a lot as a child?) or this condition makes you so insane
when challenged that you simply can't see when you're wrong. Which is
it? I think you are much more likely to break down..

Since you already have broken down and gone at least temporarily insane
for the exact reason that you're too stupid to admit when you're wrong
and think you are always correct even when proven wrong with
incontrovertible evidence, we have all already seen the answer to your
question for YOU.

Steve

Bill Cole wrote:

Steve,
Do you enjoy tweaking the mentally challenged?



Naw. You're too easy.


--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.