![]() |
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
"Joe" wrote in message ...
OnLanier, DimDummy, Asslicker spewed Yes, I've been doing some checking. There is no shame in being a cable installer, as long as you are a good one. Your right, and if I was I were one, I'd be a good one. You on the other hand have proved that you can not possibly be a good Engineer. A good Engineer can not live in a fantasy word, especially when the lives of people are at stake. I truly hope your just a lackey they keep around to stamp prints after others complete the design. Heehee, yeah right, JoeTechnician. |
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
"Calif Bill" wrote in message ...
You hide you ID, because if the state saw how stupid you were in your answers to oil usage and other engineering questions, they would investigate hou hou got a license. Bill Not very bright, are you? The state has these things called records, you know. They KNOW how I got my license. I took the EIT test, then sat for the P.E. |
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
|
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
|
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
"basskisser" wrote in message om... "Calif Bill" wrote in message ... You hide you ID, because if the state saw how stupid you were in your answers to oil usage and other engineering questions, they would investigate hou hou got a license. Bill Not very bright, are you? The state has these things called records, you know. They KNOW how I got my license. I took the EIT test, then sat for the P.E. As dumb as you are, they would wonder who sat for the test. |
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
"Joe" wrote in message ...
Yes, I've been doing some checking. There is no shame in being a cable installer, as long as you are a good one. Your right, and if I was I were one, I'd be a good one. You on the other hand have proved that you can not possibly be a good Engineer. A good Engineer can not live in a fantasy word, especially when the lives of people are at stake. I truly hope your just a lackey they keep around to stamp prints after others complete the design. Heehee, yeah right, JoeTechnician. I'm dead serious, DimDummy. If so, then you are stupid. Plan and simple, JoeTechnician. |
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
"Calif Bill" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message om... "Calif Bill" wrote in message ... You hide you ID, because if the state saw how stupid you were in your answers to oil usage and other engineering questions, they would investigate hou hou got a license. Bill Not very bright, are you? The state has these things called records, you know. They KNOW how I got my license. I took the EIT test, then sat for the P.E. As dumb as you are, they would wonder who sat for the test. Wonder who sat for YOUR test. What does "....investigate hou hou got a license" mean, anyway? And concrete weighs how much? |
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
It is a typo, I am not a PE, but even a participant in the Special Olympics
would know he meant "how you". "basskisser" wrote in message m... What does "....investigate hou hou got a license" mean, anyway? And concrete weighs how much? |
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
Steve,
Do you enjoy tweaking the mentally challenged? "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On 5 Aug 2003 03:49:40 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 4 Aug 2003 04:29:15 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message So why do you keep doing it? And why are you pointing that out with this post? If you understood english you'd realize I didn't call you a name. Steve Didn't call me a name? Well, now, Steve, YOU said that name calling is "so school girlish", correct? Well, here, ya go, school girl!: On 7/31/03 Shelikoff wrote: Yup, you're the only stalker around here. You STUPID IDIOT!!! I said why are you pointing that out with THIS post! More proof you can't read and understand plain english. Heehee!! Why would it make a difference WHAT post I was pointing that out in? If it is indeed a fact, it would be a fact in ANY post. But, you wouldn't understand that, right? And you don't understand plain english. I asked why you replied that way to THAT post, not to any post. You could have just as easily answer it as above. But you're too stupid for that. Now, I'll put back the post you replied to and your reply: If you weren't such a danger to those around you due to your temper and frustrations, I'd think you were just a funny baffoon. Name calling. That is SO school girlish. Now again, I ask you, why are you pointing out name calling is SO school girlish in your reply to my post when I didn't call you a name in that post? You really are a moron. There, now you can say name calling is school girlish in your reply to this post and it'll at least make sense, you little baby. It's incredibly difficult to believe someone as immature as you is actually a PE. I'd love to hear you testify in court on some matter. You'd break down, cry and babble like a little baby if the cross got too tough. I've given expert witness in several courts. Made some pretty easy money that way. And, Steve, you could NEVER get me to break down. You Par for the course, you're wrong yet again. I already HAVE gotten you to break down. What else would you call it when, because you can't defend your position, you end up making threats to break necks? That would go over wonderfully on the witness stand. You're just toooooo damn easy. Any lawyer with half a brain would rip you apart. on the other hand, apparently have some kind of mental condition that makes you either have a need to think you are always correct (possibly got beat a lot as a child?) or this condition makes you so insane when challenged that you simply can't see when you're wrong. Which is it? I think you are much more likely to break down.. Since you already have broken down and gone at least temporarily insane for the exact reason that you're too stupid to admit when you're wrong and think you are always correct even when proven wrong with incontrovertible evidence, we have all already seen the answer to your question for YOU. Steve |
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
Steve,
Only the weakest of the weak or those on the verge of going over the edge ever make a threat in UseNet. I hope you don't push him too far and he ends up going "postal" on some innocent person. "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 12:48:42 GMT, "Bill Cole" wrote: Steve, Do you enjoy tweaking the mentally challenged? Only when they brag and boast about how smart they are and refuse to admit they're wrong even when they make an obvious blunder, and when they make threats to break my "pencil neck", lol. If the idiot wasn't also such a braggard, I'd have let him off the hook long ago. Steve "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On 5 Aug 2003 03:49:40 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 4 Aug 2003 04:29:15 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message So why do you keep doing it? And why are you pointing that out with this post? If you understood english you'd realize I didn't call you a name. Steve Didn't call me a name? Well, now, Steve, YOU said that name calling is "so school girlish", correct? Well, here, ya go, school girl!: On 7/31/03 Shelikoff wrote: Yup, you're the only stalker around here. You STUPID IDIOT!!! I said why are you pointing that out with THIS post! More proof you can't read and understand plain english. Heehee!! Why would it make a difference WHAT post I was pointing that out in? If it is indeed a fact, it would be a fact in ANY post. But, you wouldn't understand that, right? And you don't understand plain english. I asked why you replied that way to THAT post, not to any post. You could have just as easily answer it as above. But you're too stupid for that. Now, I'll put back the post you replied to and your reply: If you weren't such a danger to those around you due to your temper and frustrations, I'd think you were just a funny baffoon. Name calling. That is SO school girlish. Now again, I ask you, why are you pointing out name calling is SO school girlish in your reply to my post when I didn't call you a name in that post? You really are a moron. There, now you can say name calling is school girlish in your reply to this post and it'll at least make sense, you little baby. It's incredibly difficult to believe someone as immature as you is actually a PE. I'd love to hear you testify in court on some matter. You'd break down, cry and babble like a little baby if the cross got too tough. I've given expert witness in several courts. Made some pretty easy money that way. And, Steve, you could NEVER get me to break down. You Par for the course, you're wrong yet again. I already HAVE gotten you to break down. What else would you call it when, because you can't defend your position, you end up making threats to break necks? That would go over wonderfully on the witness stand. You're just toooooo damn easy. Any lawyer with half a brain would rip you apart. on the other hand, apparently have some kind of mental condition that makes you either have a need to think you are always correct (possibly got beat a lot as a child?) or this condition makes you so insane when challenged that you simply can't see when you're wrong. Which is it? I think you are much more likely to break down.. Since you already have broken down and gone at least temporarily insane for the exact reason that you're too stupid to admit when you're wrong and think you are always correct even when proven wrong with incontrovertible evidence, we have all already seen the answer to your question for YOU. Steve |
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
"basskisser" wrote in message m... "Calif Bill" wrote in message ... "basskisser" wrote in message om... "Calif Bill" wrote in message ... You hide you ID, because if the state saw how stupid you were in your answers to oil usage and other engineering questions, they would investigate hou hou got a license. Bill Not very bright, are you? The state has these things called records, you know. They KNOW how I got my license. I took the EIT test, then sat for the P.E. As dumb as you are, they would wonder who sat for the test. Wonder who sat for YOUR test. What does "....investigate hou hou got a license" mean, anyway? And concrete weighs how much? Spelling misteaks happen. And I know I misspelled Mistake. |
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
He is too stupid to understand.
Bill "Bill Cole" wrote in message et... It is a typo, I am not a PE, but even a participant in the Special Olympics would know he meant "how you". "basskisser" wrote in message m... What does "....investigate hou hou got a license" mean, anyway? And concrete weighs how much? |
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
Bill Cole wrote:
Steve, Do you enjoy tweaking the mentally challenged? Naw. You're too easy. -- * * * email sent to will *never* get to me. |
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
"Calif Bill" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message m... "Calif Bill" wrote in message ... "basskisser" wrote in message om... "Calif Bill" wrote in message ... You hide you ID, because if the state saw how stupid you were in your answers to oil usage and other engineering questions, they would investigate hou hou got a license. Bill Not very bright, are you? The state has these things called records, you know. They KNOW how I got my license. I took the EIT test, then sat for the P.E. As dumb as you are, they would wonder who sat for the test. Wonder who sat for YOUR test. What does "....investigate hou hou got a license" mean, anyway? And concrete weighs how much? Spelling misteaks happen. And I know I misspelled Mistake. Whoa.....mister know-it-all makes mistakes? |
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
"Bill Cole" wrote in message news:utQXa.70970$Ho3.10315@sccrnsc03...
Steve, Only the weakest of the weak or those on the verge of going over the edge ever make a threat in UseNet. I hope you don't push him too far and he ends up going "postal" on some innocent person. No, the weakest of the weak call people names, and try to act like they know everything, call others stupid, dummy, etc. THEY are the truly weak ones. Why? Simple. They don't have the balls to do anything like that in real life, so they do it in usenet. Don't cry over it, Steve, Bill, and Joe....a lot of people do the same. |
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
"basskisser" wrote in message ... "Calif Bill" wrote in message ... "basskisser" wrote in message m... "Calif Bill" wrote in message ... "basskisser" wrote in message om... "Calif Bill" wrote in message ... You hide you ID, because if the state saw how stupid you were in your answers to oil usage and other engineering questions, they would investigate hou hou got a license. Bill Not very bright, are you? The state has these things called records, you know. They KNOW how I got my license. I took the EIT test, then sat for the P.E. As dumb as you are, they would wonder who sat for the test. Wonder who sat for YOUR test. What does "....investigate hou hou got a license" mean, anyway? And concrete weighs how much? Spelling misteaks happen. And I know I misspelled Mistake. Whoa.....mister know-it-all makes mistakes? Yes, you do! |
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
|
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
"Calif Bill" wrote in message ...
He is too stupid to understand. Bill No, I understand perfectly. You are one of the FIRST in a thread to point out if somebody makes a spelling error, a grammatical error, or a syntax error. Funny, but when the shoe is on the other foot, you don't like it!! |
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
On 7 Aug 2003 04:19:57 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:
(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 6 Aug 2003 04:35:02 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: "Bill Cole" wrote in message news:utQXa.70970$Ho3.10315@sccrnsc03... Steve, Only the weakest of the weak or those on the verge of going over the edge ever make a threat in UseNet. I hope you don't push him too far and he ends up going "postal" on some innocent person. No, the weakest of the weak call people names, and try to act like they know everything, call others stupid, dummy, etc. THEY are the truly weak ones. Why? Simple. They don't have the balls to do anything like that in real life, so they do it in usenet. Don't cry over it, If you add "make threats over the internet" to your list, you've pegged yourself perfectly. Nah, that's you Steve. I've already given examples of your name calling. Want more? If you haven't noticed yet, my calling you names is only a parady of YOU. Sure, it's obvious you really do deserve to be called a stupid moron, idiot, etc. But I wouldn't have actually said as much, except as a satirical portrait of the way YOU started using those terms. Now, please find an example of me threatening you physically, as you have done. At least I didn't satirize that bullying, hostile, and dangerous side of your personality. Steve |
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On 7 Aug 2003 04:19:57 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 6 Aug 2003 04:35:02 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: "Bill Cole" wrote in message news:utQXa.70970$Ho3.10315@sccrnsc03... Steve, Only the weakest of the weak or those on the verge of going over the edge ever make a threat in UseNet. I hope you don't push him too far and he ends up going "postal" on some innocent person. No, the weakest of the weak call people names, and try to act like they know everything, call others stupid, dummy, etc. THEY are the truly weak ones. Why? Simple. They don't have the balls to do anything like that in real life, so they do it in usenet. Don't cry over it, If you add "make threats over the internet" to your list, you've pegged yourself perfectly. Nah, that's you Steve. I've already given examples of your name calling. Want more? If you haven't noticed yet, my calling you names is only a parady of YOU. Sure, it's obvious you really do deserve to be called a stupid moron, idiot, etc. Thank you for making my case! By the way, it's PARODY. Now, you are also a liar. I can give examples of your name calling going WAY back, before I was ever here. All of the name calling you've done, while hiding behind a newsgroup, to others.....was THAT a parody of me, also? On top of that, if you look at any particular thread, you are always the one to start the name calling. |
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
On 8 Aug 2003 04:02:39 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:
(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 7 Aug 2003 04:19:57 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 6 Aug 2003 04:35:02 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: "Bill Cole" wrote in message news:utQXa.70970$Ho3.10315@sccrnsc03... Steve, Only the weakest of the weak or those on the verge of going over the edge ever make a threat in UseNet. I hope you don't push him too far and he ends up going "postal" on some innocent person. No, the weakest of the weak call people names, and try to act like they know everything, call others stupid, dummy, etc. THEY are the truly weak ones. Why? Simple. They don't have the balls to do anything like that in real life, so they do it in usenet. Don't cry over it, If you add "make threats over the internet" to your list, you've pegged yourself perfectly. Nah, that's you Steve. I've already given examples of your name calling. Want more? If you haven't noticed yet, my calling you names is only a parady of YOU. Sure, it's obvious you really do deserve to be called a stupid moron, idiot, etc. Thank you for making my case! By the way, it's PARODY. Now, you are Gigging someone for spelling is the furst shore sine of having no intelligent response on content. also a liar. I can give examples of your name calling going WAY back, before I was ever here. All of the name calling you've done, while Try to find one where I called someone a name first, as you do all the time. hiding behind a newsgroup, to others.....was THAT a parody of me, also? On top of that, if you look at any particular thread, you are always the one to start the name calling. We already know you're not able to follow a thread well enough to figure out who said what, when. If you were, you'd realize that when I call someone a name, it's in response to something they've already done. Steve |
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
basskisser, you must have missed my last question to you when you were talking about
your engineering consulting business. How long have you been on your own? Was it difficult to start up? Thanks. |
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
On 8 Aug 2003 10:42:55 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:
(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 8 Aug 2003 04:02:39 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 7 Aug 2003 04:19:57 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 6 Aug 2003 04:35:02 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: "Bill Cole" wrote in message news:utQXa.70970$Ho3.10315@sccrnsc03... Steve, Only the weakest of the weak or those on the verge of going over the edge ever make a threat in UseNet. I hope you don't push him too far and he ends up going "postal" on some innocent person. No, the weakest of the weak call people names, and try to act like they know everything, call others stupid, dummy, etc. THEY are the truly weak ones. Why? Simple. They don't have the balls to do anything like that in real life, so they do it in usenet. Don't cry over it, If you add "make threats over the internet" to your list, you've pegged yourself perfectly. Nah, that's you Steve. I've already given examples of your name calling. Want more? If you haven't noticed yet, my calling you names is only a parady of YOU. Sure, it's obvious you really do deserve to be called a stupid moron, idiot, etc. Thank you for making my case! By the way, it's PARODY. Now, you are Gigging someone for spelling is the furst shore sine of having no intelligent response on content. Learned from you. Is that all you can learn? Why don't you try learning something significant for a change. also a liar. I can give examples of your name calling going WAY back, before I was ever here. All of the name calling you've done, while Try to find one where I called someone a name first, as you do all the time. Look NO FURTHER THAN THIS POST!!!!!! Man, you are thick. There's your problem. You have no clue how to look no further than this post. You have no idea how to follow a thread or a conversation. You have no idea how to connect a string of logical thoughts. It's obvious from just the fact that you say one has to look no further than THIS post to see where I called someone a name first. You HAVE to look further than this post or you'll be totally lost, as you usually are. hiding behind a newsgroup, to others.....was THAT a parody of me, also? On top of that, if you look at any particular thread, you are always the one to start the name calling. We already know you're not able to follow a thread well enough to figure out who said what, when. If you were, you'd realize that when I call someone a name, it's in response to something they've already done. Again, THIS THREAD proves otherwise. The simple fact that you believe the above proves you have no clue what you're talking about. And what's even funnier is that you fail to recognize that my calling you a schoolgirl for name calling is also a parOdy of you. You are HILARIOUS when you call someone a "little schoolgirl" for name calling when all they are doing is responding to your namecalling in kind. If you actually had a point to make, it should be calling someone a schoolgirl for responding to your namecalling with more of the same. But you can't think well enough to come up with that yourself. Steve |
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
Actually, I would like to have some examples.
Bill "basskisser" wrote in message m... "Calif Bill" wrote in message ... He is too stupid to understand. Bill No, I understand perfectly. You are one of the FIRST in a thread to point out if somebody makes a spelling error, a grammatical error, or a syntax error. Funny, but when the shoe is on the other foot, you don't like it!! |
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
|
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks
"Jim" wrote in message news:1mRYa.98327$Ho3.13006@sccrnsc03...
basskisser, you must have missed my last question to you when you were talking about your engineering consulting business. How long have you been on your own? Was it difficult to start up? Thanks. Sorry, Jim, I thought I responded, perhaps it didn't post: I've been on my own for four years now. It wasn't too difficult for me, because I basically work for the same people that I worked for previously. I'd worked hard for them, and they in turn, promised to give me work when I went out on my own. I in turn, made a gentleman's agreement with them that I wouldn't do any engineering work for anybody that was in direct competition with them. I do odds and ends for some local firms that do retail building, but I don't do any work for engineering companies that bid directly against the company I worked for, in the large industrial arena. So, I guess I'm saying, I think it would be harder, somewhat, if you didn't have a prior employer to contract work from. But, there is work out there. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com