So you listen to Rush Chuck?


Almost every day, for a few minutes.

Listening to Rush and Hannity puts you well ahead of the curve when
anticipating what the neo-cons will be excited about for at least the next few
days.

I did screw up my comment, elections are every two years but the terms are four
years for congresspeople, of course, so you only have to be reelected once, not
twice, as I stated carelessly. In any event,
on single-term congressman goes home with $15,000 a month for life in
congressional pension. That's just plain wrong and ridiculous.

On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 19:00:37 -0500, JimH wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 12:50:19 -0500, Dixon wrote:



I would like to see our elected officials pick up a weapon and join
ranks before they start cutting out benefits and lowering pay for our
sons and daughters who are now fighting.

Don't expect any improvement from this administration. Party unity is
more important to them than veterans.

http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/index....9805517220.xml


Wow, the *reporter* interjects a biased opinion in the very first
sentence of the story. I thought reporters were to report stories, not
editorialize, but what would one expect from a liberal newspaper?

Do you have more credible links on this Thunder?

Oh please, the Star-Ledger is a quality newspaper. If you doubt it's
veracity, I'm afraid I won't be able to satisfy your doubts. I don't have
any links to any petroglyphs in that cave you are living in. For those
who can more reasonably access modern information:

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory...litics/2978757

http://www.thehill.com/thehill/expor...505/smith.html

http://www.thehill.com/thehill/expor.../chairman.html

http://www.indystar.com/articles/0/207112-3120-098.html

http://www.unitedspinal.org/newsroom...tem.php?id=201

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=41345

http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?n...= 44551&rfi=6

On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 18:46:07 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 12:50:19 -0500, Dixon wrote:



I would like to see our elected officials pick up a weapon and join ranks
before they start cutting out benefits and lowering pay for our sons and
daughters who are now fighting.

Don't expect any improvement from this administration. Party unity is
more important to them than veterans.

http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/index....9805517220.xml

The previous administration didn't do a whole hell of a lot for us
either!

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 19:00:37 -0500, JimH wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 12:50:19 -0500, Dixon wrote:



I would like to see our elected officials pick up a weapon and join
ranks before they start cutting out benefits and lowering pay for our
sons and daughters who are now fighting.

Don't expect any improvement from this administration. Party unity is
more important to them than veterans.

http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/index....9805517220.xml


Wow, the *reporter* interjects a biased opinion in the very first
sentence of the story. I thought reporters were to report stories, not
editorialize, but what would one expect from a liberal newspaper?

Do you have more credible links on this Thunder?

Oh please, the Star-Ledger is a quality newspaper.

Your *opinion* but not that of the majority.

Now direct me to another source that provides specific proof that "the move
was prompted by the New Jersey lawmaker's failure to follow the party line
and his insistence on increasing spending for veterans".

None of the links you provided could do so.

Coincidence? ;-)

On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 20:20:33 -0500, JohnH wrote:


http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/index....9805517220.xml

The previous administration didn't do a whole hell of a lot for us either!

For starters, he kept more of you alive.

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 20:20:33 -0500, JohnH wrote:


http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/index....9805517220.xml

The previous administration didn't do a whole hell of a lot for us
either!

For starters, he kept more of you alive.

Really? I can think of 3,000 who died on 9-11 thanks to Clinton. I can
also not recall anything he ever did to try and stop terrorism. We are now
paying the price of Clinton *blow job* impeachment Presidency.

On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 20:24:02 -0500, JimH wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 19:00:37 -0500, JimH wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 12:50:19 -0500, Dixon wrote:



I would like to see our elected officials pick up a weapon and join
ranks before they start cutting out benefits and lowering pay for our
sons and daughters who are now fighting.

Don't expect any improvement from this administration. Party unity
is more important to them than veterans.

http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/index....9805517220.xml


Wow, the *reporter* interjects a biased opinion in the very first
sentence of the story. I thought reporters were to report stories, not
editorialize, but what would one expect from a liberal newspaper?

Do you have more credible links on this Thunder?

Oh please, the Star-Ledger is a quality newspaper.

Your *opinion* but not that of the majority.

Now direct me to another source that provides specific proof that "the
move was prompted by the New Jersey lawmaker's failure to follow the party
line and his insistence on increasing spending for veterans".

None of the links you provided could do so.

Coincidence? ;-)

You are living in denial. I'd need a Freedom of Information Act request
to get anything out of the Republican Steering Committee. Keep your eyes
open, you will see more of this under DeLay and Hastert. It's called
"party discipline" and they are good at it. Washington's Farewell Address
comes to mind:

http://mysite.verizon.net/aahpat/pol/gw.htm

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 20:24:02 -0500, JimH wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 19:00:37 -0500, JimH wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 12:50:19 -0500, Dixon wrote:



I would like to see our elected officials pick up a weapon and join
ranks before they start cutting out benefits and lowering pay for our
sons and daughters who are now fighting.

Don't expect any improvement from this administration. Party unity
is more important to them than veterans.

http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/index....9805517220.xml


Wow, the *reporter* interjects a biased opinion in the very first
sentence of the story. I thought reporters were to report stories, not
editorialize, but what would one expect from a liberal newspaper?

Do you have more credible links on this Thunder?

Oh please, the Star-Ledger is a quality newspaper.

Your *opinion* but not that of the majority.

Now direct me to another source that provides specific proof that "the
move was prompted by the New Jersey lawmaker's failure to follow the
party
line and his insistence on increasing spending for veterans".

None of the links you provided could do so.

Coincidence? ;-)

You are living in denial. I'd need a Freedom of Information Act request
to get anything out of the Republican Steering Committee. Keep your eyes
open, you will see more of this under DeLay and Hastert. It's called
"party discipline" and they are good at it. Washington's Farewell Address
comes to mind:

http://mysite.verizon.net/aahpat/pol/gw.htm



So I see you fail to address my concerns with your initial reply but rather
change the subject to a remote "my site"" internet site.

How clever of you.

JimH wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 19:00:37 -0500, JimH wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 12:50:19 -0500, Dixon wrote:



I would like to see our elected officials pick up a weapon and join
ranks before they start cutting out benefits and lowering pay for our
sons and daughters who are now fighting.

Don't expect any improvement from this administration. Party unity is
more important to them than veterans.


http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/index....9805517220.xml


Wow, the *reporter* interjects a biased opinion in the very first
sentence of the story. I thought reporters were to report stories, not
editorialize, but what would one expect from a liberal newspaper?

Do you have more credible links on this Thunder?

Oh please, the Star-Ledger is a quality newspaper.

Your *opinion* but not that of the majority.

Now direct me to another source that provides specific proof that "the
move was prompted by the New Jersey lawmaker's failure to follow the party
line and his insistence on increasing spending for veterans".

None of the links you provided could do so.

Coincidence? ;-)

Here's a place you can look it up yourself while your waiting for your
"Instant Messenger Buddies" to "maybe" sign on again so you can pester them.
If I were you I wouldn't hold my breath. They probibly got you blocked.

Nobody has to prove anything to you.

http://www.google.com/

Good luck with your search.
--
_______m___õ¿~___m_________________________

Gould 0738 wrote:
.... In any event,
on single-term congressman goes home with $15,000 a month for life in
congressional pension. That's just plain wrong and ridiculous.


To a lot of people, if Rush says it, that makes it right. I'm waiting
for him to announce that water flows uphill.

DSK