Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 13:12:55 +0000, NOYB wrote:
Bush 41 was vulnerable on the economy...the upturn had started, but much too late to win the election. Bush 43 has a rapidly growing economy. There aren't any issues where he's really weak. Don't kid yourself. It will take a campaign to determine what the issues are. Potentially I can see Bush's credibility being an issue (those pesky WMDs have yet to appear), Iraq (the plan appears to be cut & run by July but if soldiers are still dying?), unforeseen events that may not show us to be safer under this President, and the economy (this spurt may not have legs). I also have this theory that has been developing since Nixon. I suspect voter apathy is not apathy at all, but a deep seated disgust with all things Washington. Since Nixon, the candidate that was, or at least portrayed himself to be, farther outside the beltway, has won. Dean appears to be tapping into this, and also appears stubborn enough not to moderate himself. If he continues, as he is doing now, I suspect Bush has a fight on his hands. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Zogby Poll: No economic rebound | General |