Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've had a few random questions rattling around the
brain for a while - figured I'd pose them there. When a sub dives to a certain depth, is that depth measured from the bottom of the sub, the middle, or the top. In other words, if it dives to 200 feet, does that mean there is 200 feet of water above it or that the bottom of it is 200 feet below the surface? On modern gas car engines and when it's cold outside, is it still better to let them warm up a bit and how warm (how long) is necessary? Anyone have a good way to find the total surface area of my boat hull while it's in the water? It's a 22' boat, not very deep V, "square" transom. I did some estimating, but wonder if there are any creative ways to get more accurate. Gary |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:24:30 -0500, "Gary Warner"
wrote: I've had a few random questions rattling around the brain for a while - figured I'd pose them there. When a sub dives to a certain depth, is that depth measured from the bottom of the sub, the middle, or the top. In other words, if it dives to 200 feet, does that mean there is 200 feet of water above it or that the bottom of it is 200 feet below the surface? On modern gas car engines and when it's cold outside, is it still better to let them warm up a bit and how warm (how long) is necessary? Anyone have a good way to find the total surface area of my boat hull while it's in the water? It's a 22' boat, not very deep V, "square" transom. I did some estimating, but wonder if there are any creative ways to get more accurate. Gary Gary, I can tell you only that the surface area of your boat is the same both in and out of the water. John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary Warner wrote:
When a sub dives to a certain depth, is that depth measured from the bottom of the sub, the middle, or the top. In other words, if it dives to 200 feet, does that mean there is 200 feet of water above it or that the bottom of it is 200 feet below the surface? Normally "depth to keel." On modern gas car engines and when it's cold outside, is it still better to let them warm up a bit and how warm (how long) is necessary? RTFM Anyone have a good way to find the total surface area of my boat hull while it's in the water? It's a 22' boat, not very deep V, "square" transom. I did some estimating, but wonder if there are any creative ways to get more accurate. Assuming you are seeking the "wetted area" rent one of those laser thingys that scan a surface into a computer. Turn your boat on its side and scan. Read computer generated results. Rick |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
When a sub dives to a certain depth, is that depth
measured from the bottom of the sub, the middle, or the top. In other words, if it dives to 200 feet, does that mean there is 200 feet of water above it or that the bottom of it is 200 feet below the surface? Normally "depth to keel. I don't know squat diddly about submarines, but I think I can answer this question. *If* the dive indicator reads "zero" when the sub is on the surface, the submerged depth would be measured from the normally ballasted waterline to the surface. It wouldn't seem logical, otherwise. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gould 0738 wrote:
It wouldn't seem logical, otherwise. Posting an answer to something I know nothing about is illogical. Rick |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posting an answer to something I know nothing about is illogical.
Rick I don't dispute that- ergo the disclaimer. But if the depth is measured from the keel and there is a depth indicator on the sub it will never read zero. Is that somehow incorrect? That was why I postulated *if* a depth guage read zero at the surface the reading would have to be from the normally ballasted waterline. Since it apparently does not read zero, that theory doesn't fly. Freely admitted. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Gould 0738 wrote: I don't dispute that- ergo the disclaimer. But if the depth is measured from the keel and there is a depth indicator on the sub it will never read zero. Is that somehow incorrect? That was why I postulated *if* a depth guage read zero at the surface the reading would have to be from the normally ballasted waterline. Since it apparently does not read zero, that theory doesn't fly. Freely admitted. It has never been part of submarine law that it must read zero on the surface. Why should it? The depth to keel is also an indication of freeboard. A submarine, after surfacing, will use a low pressure blower to push the last bit of water from the ballast tanks in order to increase the freeboard. The depth gauge shows when it is as high as it will go. Rick |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rick" wrote: On modern gas car engines and when it's cold outside, is it still better to let them warm up a bit and how warm (how long) is necessary? RTFM I read the f'ing manual. It explains how to start it in the cold but not a word about warming it up or idling. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:24:30 -0500, "Gary Warner"
wrote: I've had a few random questions rattling around the brain for a while - figured I'd pose them there. When a sub dives to a certain depth, is that depth measured from the bottom of the sub, the middle, or the top. In other words, if it dives to 200 feet, does that mean there is 200 feet of water above it or that the bottom of it is 200 feet below the surface? Interesting question but I have no idea. On modern gas car engines and when it's cold outside, is it still better to let them warm up a bit and how warm (how long) is necessary? Not necessary at all assuming everthing is in tune and the engine is running smoothly. Just don't over rev the engine until it's up to operating temperature, usually within a few miles. Anyone have a good way to find the total surface area of my boat hull while it's in the water? It's a 22' boat, not very deep V, "square" transom. I did some estimating, but wonder if there are any creative ways to get more accurate. If you piece it out into a rectangle and a triangle on each side, you can get pretty close with a deep V hull. Given the deadrise angle and length we could develop a trig formula that would be a good approximation, but it's easier to piece it out, and you'll have a better intuitive sense of the answer. (Length x Beam) + a small fudge factor will also get you pretty close. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|