BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Hitch inversion theory (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/26777-hitch-inversion-theory.html)

Ad absurdum per aspera January 2nd 05 06:21 PM

Hitch inversion theory
 
Three times in the past week or so, I've noticed something I don't
recall seeing befo someone with a high-riding pickup or SUV who had
two to six inches of drop hitch -- installed upside down.

Two of them had a trailer on, and in the worst case, a flatbed behind a
Ford Excursion, the upside-down apparatus combined with the tall
vehicle to leave it sitting at maybe a twenty-degree angle. I'm
surprised he didn't leave his trailer taillights on the speed bumps --
or his cargo on the road going up a steep hill.

Just for completeness, I went to a local store and looked at the
catalogue from one of the big makers of trailering tools and toys.
Sure enough, it contained not only instructions but photographs showing
what things are supposed to look like when properly rigged. Somehow
people are spending money on an accessory that they probably need --
and using it exactly wrong.
Fishtailing soon down an Interstate near you...

--Joe


LD January 2nd 05 07:04 PM

I have two vehicles I flip the hitch (the std 2" drop where in the "correct"
position the ball mounting surface is even w/bottom of the hitch). This
gives me a slight down on the back of the trailer for two different boats.
I frequently put my "duck boat" (a 14.5' Duracraft w/25hp Johnson) in
shallow water so this helps get it off the trailer. On the other, a 20.5'
Wellcraft w/200hp motor, it lets more water drain out but it's not down but
a couple of inches. What you're describing sounds kind of scary to be
around!
LD

"Ad absurdum per aspera" wrote in message
ups.com...
Three times in the past week or so, I've noticed something I don't
recall seeing befo someone with a high-riding pickup or SUV who had
two to six inches of drop hitch -- installed upside down.

Two of them had a trailer on, and in the worst case, a flatbed behind a
Ford Excursion, the upside-down apparatus combined with the tall
vehicle to leave it sitting at maybe a twenty-degree angle. I'm
surprised he didn't leave his trailer taillights on the speed bumps --
or his cargo on the road going up a steep hill.

Just for completeness, I went to a local store and looked at the
catalogue from one of the big makers of trailering tools and toys.
Sure enough, it contained not only instructions but photographs showing
what things are supposed to look like when properly rigged. Somehow
people are spending money on an accessory that they probably need --
and using it exactly wrong.
Fishtailing soon down an Interstate near you...

--Joe




JR North January 3rd 05 07:50 AM

Just goes with everything else stupid, brainless SUV owners do. Ever
notice how most of the cars with rear-end collision damage have the
damage about 2 feet up? Guess who? By the way, if your'e driving an SUV,
and I don't allow you you to merge in front of me- BITE ME.
JR
Ad absurdum per aspera wrote:
Three times in the past week or so, I've noticed something I don't
recall seeing befo someone with a high-riding pickup or SUV who had
two to six inches of drop hitch -- installed upside down.

Two of them had a trailer on, and in the worst case, a flatbed behind a
Ford Excursion, the upside-down apparatus combined with the tall
vehicle to leave it sitting at maybe a twenty-degree angle. I'm
surprised he didn't leave his trailer taillights on the speed bumps --
or his cargo on the road going up a steep hill.

Just for completeness, I went to a local store and looked at the
catalogue from one of the big makers of trailering tools and toys.
Sure enough, it contained not only instructions but photographs showing
what things are supposed to look like when properly rigged. Somehow
people are spending money on an accessory that they probably need --
and using it exactly wrong.
Fishtailing soon down an Interstate near you...

--Joe



--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Home Page: http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth

basskisser January 3rd 05 12:45 PM


JR North wrote:
Just goes with everything else stupid, brainless SUV owners do. Ever
notice how most of the cars with rear-end collision damage have the
damage about 2 feet up? Guess who? By the way, if your'e driving an

SUV,
and I don't allow you you to merge in front of me- BITE ME.


So, you are totally against everyone who drives any SUV? Even those
that use them for the reasons intended? Even those who need the room
for the work that they do?


Nate Nagel January 3rd 05 01:04 PM

basskisser wrote:

JR North wrote:

Just goes with everything else stupid, brainless SUV owners do. Ever
notice how most of the cars with rear-end collision damage have the
damage about 2 feet up? Guess who? By the way, if your'e driving an


SUV,

and I don't allow you you to merge in front of me- BITE ME.



So, you are totally against everyone who drives any SUV? Even those
that use them for the reasons intended? Even those who need the room
for the work that they do?


Those people are in the minority, but they tend to actually know how to
use their vehicles safely so they're not the problem.

nate

--
replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel

keith_nuttle January 3rd 05 02:47 PM

Have you ever notice that the people who are anti SUV's are from the
same group of people who insisted on gas mileage ratings that caused the
manufactures to build vehiles so small that only one or two people can
ride comfortably, and that can not pull a boat, carry a family, or have
room for other hobby type things that the average person like to do.

I guess it irks them to see their indirect creation.



JR North wrote:

Just goes with everything else stupid, brainless SUV owners do. Ever
notice how most of the cars with rear-end collision damage have the
damage about 2 feet up? Guess who? By the way, if your'e driving an SUV,
and I don't allow you you to merge in front of me- BITE ME.
JR
Ad absurdum per aspera wrote:

Three times in the past week or so, I've noticed something I don't
recall seeing befo someone with a high-riding pickup or SUV who had
two to six inches of drop hitch -- installed upside down.

Two of them had a trailer on, and in the worst case, a flatbed behind a
Ford Excursion, the upside-down apparatus combined with the tall
vehicle to leave it sitting at maybe a twenty-degree angle. I'm
surprised he didn't leave his trailer taillights on the speed bumps --
or his cargo on the road going up a steep hill.

Just for completeness, I went to a local store and looked at the
catalogue from one of the big makers of trailering tools and toys.
Sure enough, it contained not only instructions but photographs showing
what things are supposed to look like when properly rigged. Somehow
people are spending money on an accessory that they probably need --
and using it exactly wrong.
Fishtailing soon down an Interstate near you...

--Joe





Nate Nagel January 3rd 05 03:51 PM

keith_nuttle wrote:

Have you ever notice that the people who are anti SUV's are from the
same group of people who insisted on gas mileage ratings that caused the
manufactures to build vehiles so small that only one or two people can
ride comfortably, and that can not pull a boat, carry a family, or have
room for other hobby type things that the average person like to do.

I guess it irks them to see their indirect creation.


As usual, the gross generalizations have exceptions. Yes, i do *drive*
a car that only seats two people comfortably, but I firmly believe that
market forces should determine what people purchase, not CAFE.

nate

--
replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel

Stanley Barthfarkle January 4th 05 07:43 PM

.....and just what do you pull your boat with, oh master of the practical?

"JR North" wrote in message
...
Just goes with everything else stupid, brainless SUV owners do. Ever
notice how most of the cars with rear-end collision damage have the damage
about 2 feet up? Guess who? By the way, if your'e driving an SUV, and I
don't allow you you to merge in front of me- BITE ME.
JR
Ad absurdum per aspera wrote:
Three times in the past week or so, I've noticed something I don't
recall seeing befo someone with a high-riding pickup or SUV who had
two to six inches of drop hitch -- installed upside down.

Two of them had a trailer on, and in the worst case, a flatbed behind a
Ford Excursion, the upside-down apparatus combined with the tall
vehicle to leave it sitting at maybe a twenty-degree angle. I'm
surprised he didn't leave his trailer taillights on the speed bumps --
or his cargo on the road going up a steep hill.

Just for completeness, I went to a local store and looked at the
catalogue from one of the big makers of trailering tools and toys.
Sure enough, it contained not only instructions but photographs showing
what things are supposed to look like when properly rigged. Somehow
people are spending money on an accessory that they probably need --
and using it exactly wrong.
Fishtailing soon down an Interstate near you...

--Joe



--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Home Page: http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth




Calif Bill January 4th 05 08:46 PM

He sounds like those head up the ass drivers who cause accidents by not
showing any courtesy. Maybe those SUV's hit the car in front because the
car in front sees the extra room the SUV left and pulls into the space and
applies the brakes. Happens lots while towing the boat and freeway onramps
and offramps are involved.
Bill

"Stanley Barthfarkle" wrote in message
m...
....and just what do you pull your boat with, oh master of the practical?

"JR North" wrote in message
...
Just goes with everything else stupid, brainless SUV owners do. Ever
notice how most of the cars with rear-end collision damage have the

damage
about 2 feet up? Guess who? By the way, if your'e driving an SUV, and I
don't allow you you to merge in front of me- BITE ME.
JR
Ad absurdum per aspera wrote:
Three times in the past week or so, I've noticed something I don't
recall seeing befo someone with a high-riding pickup or SUV who had
two to six inches of drop hitch -- installed upside down.

Two of them had a trailer on, and in the worst case, a flatbed behind a
Ford Excursion, the upside-down apparatus combined with the tall
vehicle to leave it sitting at maybe a twenty-degree angle. I'm
surprised he didn't leave his trailer taillights on the speed bumps --
or his cargo on the road going up a steep hill.

Just for completeness, I went to a local store and looked at the
catalogue from one of the big makers of trailering tools and toys.
Sure enough, it contained not only instructions but photographs showing
what things are supposed to look like when properly rigged. Somehow
people are spending money on an accessory that they probably need --
and using it exactly wrong.
Fishtailing soon down an Interstate near you...

--Joe



--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Home Page: http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth






JR North January 5th 05 04:40 AM

/rant
The main beef I have with SUVs is the people who drive them have little
or no experience with the shifted drivers perspective due to the
elevated eye level. I have come within a short hair's width of being
broadsided TWICE by Lincoln Navigators, who's drivers ran a stop sign on
an intersecting side street. This is because they are used to looking UP
at a stop sign in a car. The elevated eye level in an SUV puts the sign
about level with the driver. So, it doesn't register. People who are
used to driving trucks do not make this error. The higher driver
position causes an error in judging the distance of the car in front,
and sometimes not even seeing it because it is below the drivers
straight ahead line of vision. I was waiting to turn left into a 7-11
with my brake and T/S lights on in my '70 Datsun Roadster. I glanced in
my RVM to see a Ford Expedition barreling right at me at 45mph. I
stomped the gas and got out of her way just in the nick of time. I could
see her face as I glanced- see was staring straight ahead- didn't even
see me sitting there. If I hadn't moved, I would have been killed-
literally run-over by that monster.
Suvs rear-end cars for the above illustrated conditions. I have 3
neighbors with SUVs, all 3 currently have front end damage.
As I said, look at the number of cars with rear end collision damage
well above bumper height.
I have had SUV's repeatedly change lanes into me(without colliding),
because they can't see smaller cars next to them.
Am I discourteous to SUVs? You bet. I can't trust one behind me, and
can't see around one in front of me. If one is next to me, I'm just
waiting for it to swerve into my lane. If one is approaching on a side
street, I expect it to run the stop sign. This is no way to drive with
peace-of-mind.
The main problem is the nitwits that drive them have no experience
driving a large, high vehicle.
I'm just counting the days till I get killed by one.....
\rant
JR

Ad absurdum per aspera wrote:
Three times in the past week or so, I've noticed something I don't
recall seeing befo someone with a high-riding pickup or SUV who had
two to six inches of drop hitch -- installed upside down.

Two of them had a trailer on, and in the worst case, a flatbed behind a
Ford Excursion, the upside-down apparatus combined with the tall
vehicle to leave it sitting at maybe a twenty-degree angle. I'm
surprised he didn't leave his trailer taillights on the speed bumps --
or his cargo on the road going up a steep hill.

Just for completeness, I went to a local store and looked at the
catalogue from one of the big makers of trailering tools and toys.
Sure enough, it contained not only instructions but photographs showing
what things are supposed to look like when properly rigged. Somehow
people are spending money on an accessory that they probably need --
and using it exactly wrong.
Fishtailing soon down an Interstate near you...

--Joe



--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Home Page: http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
If you're not the lead dog, the view never changes
Doubt yourself, and the real world will eat you alive
The world doesn't revolve around you, it revolves around me
No skeletons in the closet; just decomposing corpses
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dependence is Vulnerability:
--------------------------------------------------------------
"Open the Pod Bay Doors please, Hal"
"I'm sorry, Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.."

El Alumbrado January 5th 05 05:16 AM

"JR North" wrote in message
...
/rant
The main problem is the nitwits that drive them have no experience driving
a large, high vehicle.


Didja ever notice how a really bad driver always seems to be surrounded by
what he perceives to be bad drivers?

El Alumbrado
"Civis Texanus Sum"



Calif Bill January 5th 05 06:31 AM


"JR North" wrote in message
...
/rant
The main beef I have with SUVs is the people who drive them have little
or no experience with the shifted drivers perspective due to the
elevated eye level. I have come within a short hair's width of being
broadsided TWICE by Lincoln Navigators, who's drivers ran a stop sign on
an intersecting side street. This is because they are used to looking UP
at a stop sign in a car. The elevated eye level in an SUV puts the sign
about level with the driver. So, it doesn't register. People who are
used to driving trucks do not make this error. The higher driver
position causes an error in judging the distance of the car in front,
and sometimes not even seeing it because it is below the drivers
straight ahead line of vision. I was waiting to turn left into a 7-11
with my brake and T/S lights on in my '70 Datsun Roadster. I glanced in
my RVM to see a Ford Expedition barreling right at me at 45mph. I
stomped the gas and got out of her way just in the nick of time. I could
see her face as I glanced- see was staring straight ahead- didn't even
see me sitting there. If I hadn't moved, I would have been killed-
literally run-over by that monster.
Suvs rear-end cars for the above illustrated conditions. I have 3
neighbors with SUVs, all 3 currently have front end damage.
As I said, look at the number of cars with rear end collision damage
well above bumper height.
I have had SUV's repeatedly change lanes into me(without colliding),
because they can't see smaller cars next to them.
Am I discourteous to SUVs? You bet. I can't trust one behind me, and
can't see around one in front of me. If one is next to me, I'm just
waiting for it to swerve into my lane. If one is approaching on a side
street, I expect it to run the stop sign. This is no way to drive with
peace-of-mind.
The main problem is the nitwits that drive them have no experience
driving a large, high vehicle.
I'm just counting the days till I get killed by one.....
\rant
JR

Ad absurdum per aspera wrote:
Three times in the past week or so, I've noticed something I don't
recall seeing befo someone with a high-riding pickup or SUV who had
two to six inches of drop hitch -- installed upside down.

Two of them had a trailer on, and in the worst case, a flatbed behind a
Ford Excursion, the upside-down apparatus combined with the tall
vehicle to leave it sitting at maybe a twenty-degree angle. I'm
surprised he didn't leave his trailer taillights on the speed bumps --
or his cargo on the road going up a steep hill.

Just for completeness, I went to a local store and looked at the
catalogue from one of the big makers of trailering tools and toys.
Sure enough, it contained not only instructions but photographs showing
what things are supposed to look like when properly rigged. Somehow
people are spending money on an accessory that they probably need --
and using it exactly wrong.
Fishtailing soon down an Interstate near you...

--Joe



--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Home Page: http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
If you're not the lead dog, the view never changes
Doubt yourself, and the real world will eat you alive
The world doesn't revolve around you, it revolves around me
No skeletons in the closet; just decomposing corpses
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dependence is Vulnerability:
--------------------------------------------------------------
"Open the Pod Bay Doors please, Hal"
"I'm sorry, Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.."


Maybe you are bad driver. I now drive an SUV and a Chevy 2500 truck. I
have been hit over the years, including those when I drove non-suv, by
several vehicles. None an SUV or truck. An Oldsmobile while stopped at a
red light. A BMW at a stop light in San Francisco. hitting a Chevy 2500
truck trailer hitch does no damage to the truck at commute stop and go
speed. I have had my S-10 Blazer hit when it was 2 weeks old. Stop and go
on the freeway off ramp. Older Datsun. A fullsize T-bird hit my regular
car while parked. A honda civic in a parking lot. From his perspective I
had to be large, so why did he drive into me while I was in a parking slot.
I was about 2' from the Expedition when he ran into me. A guy fell a sleep
driving through a parking lot and smashed the rear bumper and corner of my
s10 p/u while driving a small rental car. Fact is, I have been hit 5 times
while parked. None were an SUV.
Bill



Lamont Cranston January 5th 05 11:35 AM

On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 23:16:27 -0600, "El Alumbrado"
wrote:

"JR North" wrote in message
...
/rant
The main problem is the nitwits that drive them have no experience driving
a large, high vehicle.


Didja ever notice how a really bad driver always seems to be surrounded by
what he perceives to be bad drivers?


Look at what he's driving - a roller skate.

No wonder nobody can see him.

Dan Overes January 5th 05 05:58 PM

JR North wrote:

This is no way to drive with peace-of-mind.


Anyone who drives with too much peace-of-mind isn't paying enough
attention, in my opinion. Any vehicle can have a moron behind the wheel
and by paying too much attention to the SUV you could miss the idiot in
the car next to you.

Robert Briggs January 5th 05 07:32 PM

JR North wrote:

The main beef I have with SUVs is the people who drive them have little
or no experience with the shifted drivers perspective due to the
elevated eye level. I have come within a short hair's width of being
broadsided TWICE by Lincoln Navigators, who's drivers ran a stop sign on
an intersecting side street. This is because they are used to looking UP
at a stop sign in a car. The elevated eye level in an SUV puts the sign
about level with the driver. So, it doesn't register.


That, sir, is cobblers.

A *competent* driver of *any* road-legal vehicle will see the stop
sign ahead of him *long* before its exact height becomes relevant
(unless, of course, the highway authority has allowed it to be
obscured by other clutter - but that's quite another matter).

An *incompetent* driver may very well miss the sign, whether he is
driving a Lincoln Navigator or an E-Type Jag.

There may, of course, be a *statistical correlation* between choice
of vehicle and driving competence, but competence is *far and away*
the more significant factor in road safety.

Pounds on Wood January 5th 05 10:10 PM


"JR North" wrote in message
...
snip
I was waiting to turn left into a 7-11
with my brake and T/S lights on in my '70 Datsun Roadster. I glanced in
my RVM to see a Ford Expedition barreling right at me at 45mph. I
stomped the gas and got out of her way just in the nick of time. I could
see her face as I glanced- see was staring straight ahead- didn't even
see me sitting there. If I hadn't moved, I would have been killed-
literally run-over by that monster.


And why would that be a bad thing?

This smells like the crap it is. At least you could have made up a
convincing tale. Just for the entertainment value.
--
********
Bill Pounds
http://www.billpounds.com



RAM^3 January 5th 05 11:10 PM

"Pounds on Wood" wrote in message
...

"JR North" wrote in message
...
snip
I was waiting to turn left into a 7-11
with my brake and T/S lights on in my '70 Datsun Roadster. I glanced in
my RVM to see a Ford Expedition barreling right at me at 45mph. I
stomped the gas and got out of her way just in the nick of time. I could
see her face as I glanced- see was staring straight ahead- didn't even
see me sitting there. If I hadn't moved, I would have been killed-
literally run-over by that monster.


And why would that be a bad thing?

This smells like the crap it is. At least you could have made up a
convincing tale. Just for the entertainment value.
--
********
Bill Pounds
http://www.billpounds.com



Unfortunately, JR is probably telling the unvarnished truth.

Drivers tend to look straight ahead and neither up nor down - if they don't
see another driver's head or the roofline of a vehicle then, to them, it
simply isn't there.

I was rear-ended by a driver who "didn't see" my '62 MG Midget, hit head on
by another driver [same Midget], and sideswiped by yet a third driver while
I was driving an '81 GMC pickup [he was driving a '79 LTD].

All 3 claimed that they didn't even know my vehicle was there.

Your olfactory organ is malfunctioning - go see your doctor.



Pounds on Wood January 5th 05 11:56 PM


Unfortunately, JR is probably telling the unvarnished truth.

Drivers tend to look straight ahead and neither up nor down - if they

don't
see another driver's head or the roofline of a vehicle then, to them, it
simply isn't there.

I was rear-ended by a driver who "didn't see" my '62 MG Midget, hit head

on
by another driver [same Midget], and sideswiped by yet a third driver

while
I was driving an '81 GMC pickup [he was driving a '79 LTD].

All 3 claimed that they didn't even know my vehicle was there.

Your olfactory organ is malfunctioning - go see your doctor.



Getting rear ended I can buy. Seeing it coming, and reacting, and
accelerating out of the way, in a Datsun, and seeing the driver in the
rearview, I don't buy at any price.

--
********
Bill Pounds
http://www.billpounds.com



FredO January 6th 05 12:18 AM

I have had to do that same thing on several occasions (accelerate away from someone I saw in my rear view mirror who had no idea I
was in front of them) in my 1/2 ton GMC 4X4 P/up
Fredo
"Pounds on Wood" wrote in message ...

Unfortunately, JR is probably telling the unvarnished truth.

Drivers tend to look straight ahead and neither up nor down - if they

don't
see another driver's head or the roofline of a vehicle then, to them, it
simply isn't there.

I was rear-ended by a driver who "didn't see" my '62 MG Midget, hit head

on
by another driver [same Midget], and sideswiped by yet a third driver

while
I was driving an '81 GMC pickup [he was driving a '79 LTD].

All 3 claimed that they didn't even know my vehicle was there.

Your olfactory organ is malfunctioning - go see your doctor.



Getting rear ended I can buy. Seeing it coming, and reacting, and
accelerating out of the way, in a Datsun, and seeing the driver in the
rearview, I don't buy at any price.

--
********
Bill Pounds
http://www.billpounds.com





Calif Bill January 6th 05 03:01 AM

The fact that he was in a 1/2 ton pickup and they claim they did not see
him, negates all his arguments about only looking forward, not up / down.
As to getting rear ended and seeing it coming, yes you can. I got rear
ended at a stop light. Guys brakes failed, and I sam him coming to fast,
but no where to escape. I laid across the seat and braced myself.
Bill

"FredO" . wrote in message
...
I have had to do that same thing on several occasions (accelerate away

from someone I saw in my rear view mirror who had no idea I
was in front of them) in my 1/2 ton GMC 4X4 P/up
Fredo
"Pounds on Wood" wrote in message

...

Unfortunately, JR is probably telling the unvarnished truth.

Drivers tend to look straight ahead and neither up nor down - if they

don't
see another driver's head or the roofline of a vehicle then, to them,

it
simply isn't there.

I was rear-ended by a driver who "didn't see" my '62 MG Midget, hit

head
on
by another driver [same Midget], and sideswiped by yet a third driver

while
I was driving an '81 GMC pickup [he was driving a '79 LTD].

All 3 claimed that they didn't even know my vehicle was there.

Your olfactory organ is malfunctioning - go see your doctor.



Getting rear ended I can buy. Seeing it coming, and reacting, and
accelerating out of the way, in a Datsun, and seeing the driver in the
rearview, I don't buy at any price.

--
********
Bill Pounds
http://www.billpounds.com







RAM^3 January 6th 05 04:47 AM

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...
The fact that he was in a 1/2 ton pickup and they claim they did not see
him, negates all his arguments about only looking forward, not up / down.
As to getting rear ended and seeing it coming, yes you can. I got rear
ended at a stop light. Guys brakes failed, and I sam him coming to fast,
but no where to escape. I laid across the seat and braced myself.
Bill


The driver who, quite literally, pulled to the left when we were parallel [I
had a guardrail on my left] couldn't recognize that the blue door panel was
part of a vehicle.

His claim to have looked was a phoney: I actually happened to glance over at
him just as he went to move into my lane and his head never moved.



Calif Bill January 6th 05 05:09 AM


"RAM^3" wrote in message
...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...
The fact that he was in a 1/2 ton pickup and they claim they did not see
him, negates all his arguments about only looking forward, not up /

down.
As to getting rear ended and seeing it coming, yes you can. I got rear
ended at a stop light. Guys brakes failed, and I sam him coming to

fast,
but no where to escape. I laid across the seat and braced myself.
Bill


The driver who, quite literally, pulled to the left when we were parallel

[I
had a guardrail on my left] couldn't recognize that the blue door panel

was
part of a vehicle.

His claim to have looked was a phoney: I actually happened to glance over

at
him just as he went to move into my lane and his head never moved.



It contradicts your statement that SUV drivers can not see. Some SUV
drivers, same as car drivers, have there head up their ass, and with no
window in the stomach can not see. Those are the ones who drive in the left
lane at 20 under the speed limit, and run into or cause accidents. Nothing
to do with the size of the SUV.



JR North January 6th 05 05:14 AM

I guess you got your handle from pounding on your head...
JR
Pounds on Wood wrote:
"JR North" wrote in message
...

snip
I was waiting to turn left into a 7-11
with my brake and T/S lights on in my '70 Datsun Roadster. I glanced in
my RVM to see a Ford Expedition barreling right at me at 45mph. I
stomped the gas and got out of her way just in the nick of time. I could
see her face as I glanced- see was staring straight ahead- didn't even
see me sitting there. If I hadn't moved, I would have been killed-
literally run-over by that monster.



And why would that be a bad thing?

This smells like the crap it is. At least you could have made up a
convincing tale. Just for the entertainment value.
--
********
Bill Pounds
http://www.billpounds.com




--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Home Page: http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth

JR North January 6th 05 05:30 AM

Considering the large percentage of SUV owners on the road, I consider
the negative reply posts to be just piqued SUV owners. Feeling self
conscious?
JR

JR North wrote:

/rant
The main beef I have with SUVs is the people who drive them have little
or no experience with the shifted drivers perspective due to the
elevated eye level. I have come within a short hair's width of being
broadsided TWICE by Lincoln Navigators, who's drivers ran a stop sign on
an intersecting side street. This is because they are used to looking UP
at a stop sign in a car. The elevated eye level in an SUV puts the sign
about level with the driver. So, it doesn't register. People who are
used to driving trucks do not make this error. The higher driver
position causes an error in judging the distance of the car in front,
and sometimes not even seeing it because it is below the drivers
straight ahead line of vision. I was waiting to turn left into a 7-11
with my brake and T/S lights on in my '70 Datsun Roadster. I glanced in
my RVM to see a Ford Expedition barreling right at me at 45mph. I
stomped the gas and got out of her way just in the nick of time. I could
see her face as I glanced- see was staring straight ahead- didn't even
see me sitting there. If I hadn't moved, I would have been killed-
literally run-over by that monster.
Suvs rear-end cars for the above illustrated conditions. I have 3
neighbors with SUVs, all 3 currently have front end damage.
As I said, look at the number of cars with rear end collision damage
well above bumper height.
I have had SUV's repeatedly change lanes into me(without colliding),
because they can't see smaller cars next to them.
Am I discourteous to SUVs? You bet. I can't trust one behind me, and
can't see around one in front of me. If one is next to me, I'm just
waiting for it to swerve into my lane. If one is approaching on a side
street, I expect it to run the stop sign. This is no way to drive with
peace-of-mind.
The main problem is the nitwits that drive them have no experience
driving a large, high vehicle.
I'm just counting the days till I get killed by one.....
\rant
JR

Ad absurdum per aspera wrote:

Three times in the past week or so, I've noticed something I don't
recall seeing befo someone with a high-riding pickup or SUV who had
two to six inches of drop hitch -- installed upside down.

Two of them had a trailer on, and in the worst case, a flatbed behind a
Ford Excursion, the upside-down apparatus combined with the tall
vehicle to leave it sitting at maybe a twenty-degree angle. I'm
surprised he didn't leave his trailer taillights on the speed bumps --
or his cargo on the road going up a steep hill.

Just for completeness, I went to a local store and looked at the
catalogue from one of the big makers of trailering tools and toys.
Sure enough, it contained not only instructions but photographs showing
what things are supposed to look like when properly rigged. Somehow
people are spending money on an accessory that they probably need --
and using it exactly wrong.
Fishtailing soon down an Interstate near you...

--Joe





--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Home Page: http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
If you're not the lead dog, the view never changes
Doubt yourself, and the real world will eat you alive
The world doesn't revolve around you, it revolves around me
No skeletons in the closet; just decomposing corpses
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dependence is Vulnerability:
--------------------------------------------------------------
"Open the Pod Bay Doors please, Hal"
"I'm sorry, Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.."

Calif Bill January 6th 05 06:21 AM

I figure you are a twit, that probably can not drive a sport car or a truck.
I used to race sportscars (I am in the original Herbie), as well as own a
trucking company. Over the years I have seen more idiots in small cars than
in big SUV's or trucks. At least the people in recreational trucks normally
know that you get run over by a semi, that you are going to lose. I have
had randy racer in his CRX pull infront of my Expedition, clearing it by
inches to make an offramp. I have seen sportie cars pull on to the freeway
after stopping on the onramp at 40 mph. I have also seen the soccer mom in
the SUV talking on the cell phone take her 1/2 out of the middle of the
road. As well as guys in sedans, driving 45 in the middle lane of the
freeway and wandering from side to side, while talking on his cell phone (is
he talking to the soccer mom?). There are bad drivers in all size vehicles.
I just happen to see more stupid stunts by small cars cutting off a boat
towing SUV or truck as they see the room between the truck and the next car.
And no space on the california freeway goes unfilled for more than 10
seconds.
"JR North" wrote in message
...
Considering the large percentage of SUV owners on the road, I consider
the negative reply posts to be just piqued SUV owners. Feeling self
conscious?
JR

JR North wrote:

/rant
The main beef I have with SUVs is the people who drive them have little
or no experience with the shifted drivers perspective due to the
elevated eye level. I have come within a short hair's width of being
broadsided TWICE by Lincoln Navigators, who's drivers ran a stop sign on
an intersecting side street. This is because they are used to looking UP
at a stop sign in a car. The elevated eye level in an SUV puts the sign
about level with the driver. So, it doesn't register. People who are
used to driving trucks do not make this error. The higher driver
position causes an error in judging the distance of the car in front,
and sometimes not even seeing it because it is below the drivers
straight ahead line of vision. I was waiting to turn left into a 7-11
with my brake and T/S lights on in my '70 Datsun Roadster. I glanced in
my RVM to see a Ford Expedition barreling right at me at 45mph. I
stomped the gas and got out of her way just in the nick of time. I could
see her face as I glanced- see was staring straight ahead- didn't even
see me sitting there. If I hadn't moved, I would have been killed-
literally run-over by that monster.
Suvs rear-end cars for the above illustrated conditions. I have 3
neighbors with SUVs, all 3 currently have front end damage.
As I said, look at the number of cars with rear end collision damage
well above bumper height.
I have had SUV's repeatedly change lanes into me(without colliding),
because they can't see smaller cars next to them.
Am I discourteous to SUVs? You bet. I can't trust one behind me, and
can't see around one in front of me. If one is next to me, I'm just
waiting for it to swerve into my lane. If one is approaching on a side
street, I expect it to run the stop sign. This is no way to drive with
peace-of-mind.
The main problem is the nitwits that drive them have no experience
driving a large, high vehicle.
I'm just counting the days till I get killed by one.....
\rant
JR

Ad absurdum per aspera wrote:

Three times in the past week or so, I've noticed something I don't
recall seeing befo someone with a high-riding pickup or SUV who had
two to six inches of drop hitch -- installed upside down.

Two of them had a trailer on, and in the worst case, a flatbed behind a
Ford Excursion, the upside-down apparatus combined with the tall
vehicle to leave it sitting at maybe a twenty-degree angle. I'm
surprised he didn't leave his trailer taillights on the speed bumps --
or his cargo on the road going up a steep hill.

Just for completeness, I went to a local store and looked at the
catalogue from one of the big makers of trailering tools and toys.
Sure enough, it contained not only instructions but photographs showing
what things are supposed to look like when properly rigged. Somehow
people are spending money on an accessory that they probably need --
and using it exactly wrong.
Fishtailing soon down an Interstate near you...

--Joe





--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Home Page: http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
If you're not the lead dog, the view never changes
Doubt yourself, and the real world will eat you alive
The world doesn't revolve around you, it revolves around me
No skeletons in the closet; just decomposing corpses
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dependence is Vulnerability:
--------------------------------------------------------------
"Open the Pod Bay Doors please, Hal"
"I'm sorry, Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.."




RAM^3 January 6th 05 05:25 PM

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...

It contradicts your statement that SUV drivers can not see. Some SUV
drivers, same as car drivers, have there head up their ass, and with no
window in the stomach can not see. Those are the ones who drive in the
left
lane at 20 under the speed limit, and run into or cause accidents.
Nothing
to do with the size of the SUV.



No contradiction: *I* made no statement that *only* SUV operators suffered
from this form of psychologically-rooted "Tunnel Vision". G

Review *my* statements and you'll find that I never mentioned SUVs at all -
although the quoted text did. [Sorta like this post! G]

The phenomenon *does*, however, seem to be most prevalent in urban areas.



[email protected] January 6th 05 11:57 PM

On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:40:34 -0800, JR North wrote:

/rant
The main beef I have with SUVs is the people who drive them have little
or no experience with the shifted drivers perspective due to the
elevated eye level. I have come within a short hair's width of being
broadsided TWICE by Lincoln Navigators, who's drivers ran a stop sign on
an intersecting side street. This is because they are used to looking UP
at a stop sign in a car. The elevated eye level in an SUV puts the sign
about level with the driver. So, it doesn't register. People who are
used to driving trucks do not make this error. The higher driver
position causes an error in judging the distance of the car in front,
and sometimes not even seeing it because it is below the drivers
straight ahead line of vision. I was waiting to turn left into a 7-11
with my brake and T/S lights on in my '70 Datsun Roadster. I glanced in
my RVM to see a Ford Expedition barreling right at me at 45mph. I
stomped the gas and got out of her way just in the nick of time. I could
see her face as I glanced- see was staring straight ahead- didn't even
see me sitting there. If I hadn't moved, I would have been killed-
literally run-over by that monster.
Suvs rear-end cars for the above illustrated conditions. I have 3
neighbors with SUVs, all 3 currently have front end damage.
As I said, look at the number of cars with rear end collision damage
well above bumper height.
I have had SUV's repeatedly change lanes into me(without colliding),
because they can't see smaller cars next to them.
Am I discourteous to SUVs? You bet. I can't trust one behind me, and
can't see around one in front of me. If one is next to me, I'm just
waiting for it to swerve into my lane. If one is approaching on a side
street, I expect it to run the stop sign. This is no way to drive with
peace-of-mind.
The main problem is the nitwits that drive them have no experience
driving a large, high vehicle.
I'm just counting the days till I get killed by one.....
\rant
JR

Ad absurdum per aspera wrote:
Three times in the past week or so, I've noticed something I don't
recall seeing befo someone with a high-riding pickup or SUV who had
two to six inches of drop hitch -- installed upside down.

Two of them had a trailer on, and in the worst case, a flatbed behind a
Ford Excursion, the upside-down apparatus combined with the tall
vehicle to leave it sitting at maybe a twenty-degree angle. I'm
surprised he didn't leave his trailer taillights on the speed bumps --
or his cargo on the road going up a steep hill.

Just for completeness, I went to a local store and looked at the
catalogue from one of the big makers of trailering tools and toys.
Sure enough, it contained not only instructions but photographs showing
what things are supposed to look like when properly rigged. Somehow
people are spending money on an accessory that they probably need --
and using it exactly wrong.
Fishtailing soon down an Interstate near you...

--Joe


Damn_ pity all those folks missed ya.
We'll keep tryin'_ sooner or later one of us will git your ass.


[email protected] January 7th 05 12:10 AM

On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:30:31 -0800, JR North wrote:

Considering the large percentage of SUV owners on the road, I consider
the negative reply posts to be just piqued SUV owners. Feeling self
conscious?
JR

No_ Not in the slightest. We all know the vehicle isn't really the issue.

My wife is the worst driver I have ever known and she typically has 3 or 4 close
calls every time she gets on the road. She hates, trucks, sports-cars, suv's,
little-cars, luxury cars, blue cars, green cars, and you name it cars. Every gd
car on the road is a problem because of incompetent fools behind the wheel of
those stupid 'fill-in-the-blank' vehicles that no body needs.

Bottom line? She sucks as a driver.

Feeling self conscious yet? You should be.


Calif Bill January 7th 05 02:32 AM


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Calif Bill wrote:
I figure you are a twit, that probably can not drive a sport car or a

truck.

Nice sentence structure, oh drunken one. Gude speling, two.

I have
had randy racer in his CRX pull infront of my Expedition, clearing it by
inches to make an offramp.


Whew...and how did you know he was randy? Infront? Offramp? Are these
real compound words in California?


I have seen sportie cars pull on to the freeway
after stopping on the onramp at 40 mph.


Sportie cars? And please explain how one is stopped if one is moving at
40 mph?

You frequently point out the spelling or grammar errors of other
posters, Bile, and I often remind you that you are in no position to do

so.

Once again, you are in no position to "correct" the spelling, grammar,
or sentence structure of other posters. Your understanding of language
and ability to write is not much better than Tuuk's, and his is ****-poor.

Have another beer...you must have the shakes, eh?





Go take an enema. You are so full of ****, you may explode! Did you have
to give back your illegal gains from Ullico? Why we never hear about the
lobsta boat?



Dan Krueger January 7th 05 03:30 AM



JR North wrote:
/rant
The main beef I have with SUVs is the people who drive them have little
or no experience with the shifted drivers perspective due to the
elevated eye level. I have come within a short hair's width of being
broadsided TWICE by Lincoln Navigators, who's drivers ran a stop sign on
an intersecting side street. This is because they are used to looking UP
at a stop sign in a car. The elevated eye level in an SUV puts the sign
about level with the driver. So, it doesn't register. People who are
used to driving trucks do not make this error. The higher driver
position causes an error in judging the distance of the car in front,


SNIP

My current and last SUV were both rear ended by people who must have thought
they were invisible. We have never had an at-fault accident in either or my
previous two Jeep Grand Cherokees. Both my 2000 MDX and my 2004 X5 (6 days
old!) were hit by full-size Ford vans. In both cases, my vehicle was stopped.
The damage to the X5 including all of its safety gadgets was a bit over $7000.

Based on your theory, I guess people in E150 vans can't look FORWARD.

Dan


Calif Bill January 7th 05 03:48 AM


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Calif Bill wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Calif Bill wrote:

I figure you are a twit, that probably can not drive a sport car or a


truck.

Nice sentence structure, oh drunken one. Gude speling, two.

I have

had randy racer in his CRX pull infront of my Expedition, clearing it

by
inches to make an offramp.

Whew...and how did you know he was randy? Infront? Offramp? Are these
real compound words in California?


I have seen sportie cars pull on to the freeway

after stopping on the onramp at 40 mph.

Sportie cars? And please explain how one is stopped if one is moving at
40 mph?

You frequently point out the spelling or grammar errors of other
posters, Bile, and I often remind you that you are in no position to do


so.

Once again, you are in no position to "correct" the spelling, grammar,
or sentence structure of other posters. Your understanding of language
and ability to write is not much better than Tuuk's, and his is

****-poor.

Have another beer...you must have the shakes, eh?






Go take an enema. You are so full of ****, you may explode! Did you

have
to give back your illegal gains from Ullico? Why we never hear about

the
lobsta boat?



One more time, Bile:

I was not an officer or a member of the board of ULLICO, and therefore I
was not eligible to participate in any of the internal or external
ULLICO-related stock offerings. Further, I had no business relationship
with ULLICO at the time of the stock offerings to which you refer.

Is that simple enough for you to understand? Finally?

"Why we never hear..."


Which part of the union members pension funds did you steal?



BSCHNAUTZ January 10th 05 11:40 PM

accelerating out of the way, in a Datsun, and seeing the driver in the
rearview, I don't buy at any price.


I can.

i used to have a Datsun 2000 Sport Coupe'
They were quicker and handled better than an MGB.

actuall, pretty impressive.

I won several Autocross competitions with it.

Tim

RGrew176 January 19th 05 12:20 AM

From: JR North

The main beef I have with SUVs is the people who drive them have little
or no experience with the shifted drivers perspective due to the
elevated eye level. I have come within a short hair's width of being
broadsided TWICE by Lincoln Navigators, who's drivers ran a stop sign on
an intersecting side street. This is because they are used to looking UP
at a stop sign in a car. The elevated eye level in an SUV puts the sign
about level with the driver. So, it doesn't register. People who are
used to driving trucks do not make this error. The higher driver
position causes an error in judging the distance of the car in front,
and sometimes not even seeing it because it is below the drivers
straight ahead line of vision. I was waiting to turn left into a 7-11
with my brake and T/S lights on in my '70 Datsun Roadster. I glanced in
my RVM to see a Ford Expedition barreling right at me at 45mph. I
stomped the gas and got out of her way just in the nick of time. I could
see her face as I glanced- see was staring straight ahead- didn't even
see me sitting there. If I hadn't moved, I would have been killed-
literally run-over by that monster.
Suvs rear-end cars for the above illustrated conditions. I have 3
neighbors with SUVs, all 3 currently have front end damage.
As I said, look at the number of cars with rear end collision damage
well above bumper height.
I have had SUV's repeatedly change lanes into me(without colliding),
because they can't see smaller cars next to them.
Am I discourteous to SUVs? You bet. I can't trust one behind me, and
can't see around one in front of me. If one is next to me, I'm just
waiting for it to swerve into my lane. If one is approaching on a side
street, I expect it to run the stop sign. This is no way to drive with
peace-of-mind.
The main problem is the nitwits that drive them have no experience
driving a large, high vehicle.
I'm just counting the days till I get killed by one.....
\rant
JR

Ad absurdum per aspera wrote:
Three times in the past week or so, I've noticed something I don't
recall seeing befo someone with a high-riding pickup or SUV who had
two to six inches of drop hitch -- installed upside down.

Two of them had a trailer on, and in the worst case, a flatbed behind a
Ford Excursion, the upside-down apparatus combined with the tall
vehicle to leave it sitting at maybe a twenty-degree angle. I'm
surprised he didn't leave his trailer taillights on the speed bumps --
or his cargo on the road going up a steep hill.

Just for completeness, I went to a local store and looked at the
catalogue from one of the big makers of trailering tools and toys.
Sure enough, it contained not only instructions but photographs showing
what things are supposed to look like when properly rigged. Somehow
people are spending money on an accessory that they probably need --
and using it exactly wrong.
Fishtailing soon down an Interstate near you...

--Joe



--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Home Page: http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
If you're not the lead dog, the view never changes
Doubt yourself, and the real world will eat you alive
The world doesn't revolve around you, it revolves around me
No skeletons in the closet; just decomposing corpses
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dependence is Vulnerability:
--------------------------------------------------------------
"Open the Pod Bay Doors please, Hal"
"I'm sorry, Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.."







Hardly worth a response, the owner of a 2003 Ford Expedition. My next vehicle
will be an F-350 diesel Crew Cab, even larger and higher.

77 days to go..

Franko January 20th 05 03:30 AM

Yup, them Ford diesels look awfully good and pack a punch (am a Chevy diesel
driver myself) -- good luck and enjoy the beast!

I was reading the reposts and drawing from personal experiences on the road,
have come to the conclusion that "inexperienced SUV drivers" who are
responsible for many of the accidents/incidents alluded to, are simply "bad
drivers" to begin with, i.e., whether they drive a sedan, wagon or SUV.
There are still a majority of "bad drivers" out there zipping around in
sedans/wagons who shouldn't be on the road at all.

Another previous post mentioned small sedans (Neons, etc.) cutting off SUVs
to line up for an exit a few hundred feet away with no one behind you for a
few hundred feet -- this happens to me about once a week, rain or shine. I
had one trying to sneak in from my right rear in a two-to-one lane merge
while she was on her cell phone and she ended up leaving some paint on my
chrome bumper -- she refused to stop and kept talking on the cell phone.

Thus, there is much truth in the posts but the issue is not due to
inexperience, just bad driving. The transition from sedan/wagon driving to
SUV driving shouldn't be an issue for a good/average driver.

I choose to drive around in a 6,500 lb turbo-diesel SUV because it suits our
needs. An advantage is that all that mass and its height should help in a
collision with one of them NitWits in another SUV. Unfortunately for
smaller sedan/wagon drivers, physics will not be on their side.

Franko


"RGrew176" wrote in message
...
From: JR North


The main beef I have with SUVs is the people who drive them have little
or no experience with the shifted drivers perspective due to the
elevated eye level. I have come within a short hair's width of being
broadsided TWICE by Lincoln Navigators, who's drivers ran a stop sign on
an intersecting side street. This is because they are used to looking UP
at a stop sign in a car. The elevated eye level in an SUV puts the sign
about level with the driver. So, it doesn't register. People who are
used to driving trucks do not make this error. The higher driver
position causes an error in judging the distance of the car in front,
and sometimes not even seeing it because it is below the drivers
straight ahead line of vision. I was waiting to turn left into a 7-11
with my brake and T/S lights on in my '70 Datsun Roadster. I glanced in
my RVM to see a Ford Expedition barreling right at me at 45mph. I
stomped the gas and got out of her way just in the nick of time. I could
see her face as I glanced- see was staring straight ahead- didn't even
see me sitting there. If I hadn't moved, I would have been killed-
literally run-over by that monster.
Suvs rear-end cars for the above illustrated conditions. I have 3
neighbors with SUVs, all 3 currently have front end damage.
As I said, look at the number of cars with rear end collision damage
well above bumper height.
I have had SUV's repeatedly change lanes into me(without colliding),
because they can't see smaller cars next to them.
Am I discourteous to SUVs? You bet. I can't trust one behind me, and
can't see around one in front of me. If one is next to me, I'm just
waiting for it to swerve into my lane. If one is approaching on a side
street, I expect it to run the stop sign. This is no way to drive with
peace-of-mind.
The main problem is the nitwits that drive them have no experience
driving a large, high vehicle.
I'm just counting the days till I get killed by one.....
\rant
JR

Ad absurdum per aspera wrote:
Three times in the past week or so, I've noticed something I don't
recall seeing befo someone with a high-riding pickup or SUV who had
two to six inches of drop hitch -- installed upside down.

Two of them had a trailer on, and in the worst case, a flatbed behind a
Ford Excursion, the upside-down apparatus combined with the tall
vehicle to leave it sitting at maybe a twenty-degree angle. I'm
surprised he didn't leave his trailer taillights on the speed bumps --
or his cargo on the road going up a steep hill.

Just for completeness, I went to a local store and looked at the
catalogue from one of the big makers of trailering tools and toys.
Sure enough, it contained not only instructions but photographs showing
what things are supposed to look like when properly rigged. Somehow
people are spending money on an accessory that they probably need --
and using it exactly wrong.
Fishtailing soon down an Interstate near you...

--Joe



--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Home Page: http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
If you're not the lead dog, the view never changes
Doubt yourself, and the real world will eat you alive
The world doesn't revolve around you, it revolves around me
No skeletons in the closet; just decomposing corpses
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dependence is Vulnerability:
--------------------------------------------------------------
"Open the Pod Bay Doors please, Hal"
"I'm sorry, Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.."







Hardly worth a response, the owner of a 2003 Ford Expedition. My next

vehicle
will be an F-350 diesel Crew Cab, even larger and higher.

77 days to go..





All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com