Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "thunder" wrote in message news ![]() On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 19:30:40 +0000, NOYB wrote: Harken isn't the issue. Soros thought he could "buy" himself a politician with strong ties to the Gulf. He thought wrong...and now has a vendetta against Bush. Except that Bush, at the time, was a businessman, not a politician. Besides, what else did Bush bring to the table? A last name that had a lot of clout in the political arena. Certainly not his business acumen. Arbusto/Spectrum 7 were headed into the dumpster if it weren't for Harken money. Personally, I just don't see a vendetta, just a difference in political philosophy. Yeah, right. Soros has described himself as the "moral conscience of the world" (or some similar bull**** mumbo-jumbo). Is "buying political influence" a trait you would expect from the "moral conscience of the world"? Or perhaps legalizing drugs is a more "moral issue"? The guy is a rich, spoiled, blow-hard who is used to getting his way...and got ****ed when Bush decided to (to paraphrase Steve Miller band) "take the money and run". |