"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Jack Goff wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

It's kind of humorous in a perverted way that Hertvik and Herring keep
making snotty or snide comments while they protest what they think are
snotty and snide comments of others.


From the king of snotty and snide comments... and perversions.



Well, at least I am the king of something. You, on the other hand, are
the jackoff of all times, and, dare I posit it, a master baiter of
nothing.

Now, go play with your fellow stunatzes...


Oh... you're so irrelevant when you talk that way...

I think the only thing you are king of is your zipper... you're definitely
fixated on it, eh?

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Sigh. The clueless liberal who still thinks the whole Clinton scandal
was about sex. It was about PERJURY.


Dave

Sigh. Another clueless right winger who fails to realize there would have
been
no perjury if the Republican Congress hadn't spent $80-million taxpayer
dollars
investigating Clinton's sex life in the first place.

A married mad lied about an affair. Not news. Dumb schlitz did it under
oath...

I see that W and Cheney learned a lot from Clinton's problem, however.
When
called before the 9-11 commission to testify, they simply refused to be
sworn
in. :-)

You forget or ignore that Clinton was not being investigated for perjury, he
and President Hillary were being investigated for fraud! Clinton got his
mr. happy in the wringer, because the courts ruled that he could be sued for
sexual harassment by a state employee. That the POTUS was not above the law
of the land. And then he committed perjury. Most people go to jail for
that in a court of law. And odd that the missing law firm records showed up
in the bedroom of the POTUS after the investigation was almost completed.

Calif Bill wrote:
You forget or ignore that Clinton was not being investigated for perjury, he
and President Hillary were being investigated for fraud!

And you conveniently forget that after spending ~ $80 million and 6+
years investigating, they found nothing prosecutable.

DSK

"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
Calif Bill wrote:
You forget or ignore that Clinton was not being investigated for
perjury, he
and President Hillary were being investigated for fraud!

And you conveniently forget that after spending ~ $80 million and 6+
years investigating, they found nothing prosecutable.

DSK


OJ got off also. They were very good at blocking the investigation.
Especially after they said they would cooperate completely. That blocking
probabaly added $40mm to the total.

"Jack Goff" wrote in message
m...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

It's kind of humorous in a perverted way that Hertvik and Herring keep
making snotty or snide comments while they protest what they think are
snotty and snide comments of others.

From the king of snotty and snide comments... and perversions.



Harry said I was killfiled yet he continues to respond directly to posts I
make.

Funny.

Calif Bill wrote:
OJ got off also.

OJ got tried by a jury.

The Clintons were never charged with anything, because there was no
evidence found of a prosecutable crime.


... They were very good at blocking the investigation.
Especially after they said they would cooperate completely. That blocking
probabaly added $40mm to the total.


Two ironic things- it is of course inconceivable to you (and many
others) that the reason why nothing was found is because there was
nothing to find. You are convinced that Clintons are guilty guilty
guilty of some heinous crime, you just can't figure out what it is.
2ndly, you often claimed to be a "moderate Democrat" before the
election... are you now dropping that pretense and admitting that you're
a witch-burning Jeso-fascist whacko?

DSK

Bert Robbins wrote:
Why was there a "cleanup" team put in place during Clinton's first run for
President?


Why are you so concerned about it, 12 years later?

Isn't it more important that President Bush *still* hasn't gotten Osama
Bin Laden?

DSK

"DSK" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
Why was there a "cleanup" team put in place during Clinton's first run
for President?


Why are you so concerned about it, 12 years later?

Bill Clinton was and is a sexual predator and his Hillary was and is an
enabler of his sexual predation. Hilliary is an evil woman that is power
hungry and hitched her wagon to Bill to ride his wave to the top of the
political world. Hillary is also a crook!

Isn't it more important that President Bush *still* hasn't gotten Osama
Bin Laden?

I don't care if Pres. Bush ever gets Osama Bin Laden.

I want our military forces to chase down any and all terrorists around the
world and kill them. Terrorism is a fight that we will be involved in
forever.

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"DSK" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
Why was there a "cleanup" team put in place during Clinton's first run
for President?


Why are you so concerned about it, 12 years later?

Bill Clinton was and is a sexual predator and his Hillary was and is an
enabler of his sexual predation. Hilliary is an evil woman that is power
hungry and hitched her wagon to Bill to ride his wave to the top of the
political world. Hillary is also a crook!

Considering that you, personally, seem to have no need for evidence, you
will agree at this point that your president was a deserter.

On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:38:47 -0500, DSK wrote:

If that's what the majority wants, then what's wrong with it?

The fact that "the majority" has no influence on what's right; and that
our constitutional principles are founded on limiting the tyranny of the
majority. That is a big reason why the United States is a republic, not
a democracy.

Dave Hall wrote:
Bull ****.

Nope. It's the truth. Ask anybody who got an A in high school history
and/or civics.

I got B's, and I was always taught that we lived in a "republic" which
was a representative form of democracy. So are you telling me that all
my years of history were wrong? I realize that I was in school
probably before the liberals started their revisionist history
training, but you're older than I am so......


... Our republic is set up exactly so that the will of the
majority of the people can prevent the tyranny of ONE (or a few)
dictator (a minority).

That's also true. So why is it that you support the idea that a minority
of one can imprison or kill any citizen (or take away any lesser
Constitutional rights) on a whim?

I never said anything of the sort. This country's government was set
up such that checks and balances ensure than no one person or group
can attain absolute power.

Dave