Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Unemployment Claims Lowest Since Bush Became President
By Jimmy Moore Talon News January 1, 2004 Unemployment claims dropped last week to the lowest level since George W. Bush was inaugurated president, according to the latest jobless benefits report released by the Labor Department on Wednesday. New unemployment insurance requests fell to 339,000 for the week ending December 27. Jobless claims have not been this low since January 20, 2001, the day President Bush was sworn into office as president of the United States. Economists credit this good news in the job market to an increase in consumer confidence in the U.S. economy. They also say that business owners have ceased the layoffs and are beginning to hire new workers again as the economy continues to get better. Also, businesses are investing more capital in the economy, which will help the economy recover even faster. In fact, a recent Conference Board report estimates that more than one million new jobs will be created in 2004 as unemployment continues to fall significantly. Ken Mayland, president of ClearView Economics, says he sees job creation ready to explode. "There is clearly reason for optimism that we are getting on a significant job-generation track," he told the Associated Press. Talon News reported on a recent AP poll that found there to be optimism by the American people about the job market in 2004. The poll showed that 57 percent are either as confident or more confident in their job security than they were six months ago while only 42 percent say they are less confident. Most economic experts have been confounded by the noticeable fall in unemployment benefit claims over the past few months, which have been substantially better than any of them predicted. In fact, jobless claims have been below the 400,000 mark for 13 weeks in a row. Most economists view unemployment insurance claims below the 400,000 mark as a sign of a stable and strengthening job market. Talon News has reported on the steady decline in jobless claims since last spring. In mid-April, new jobless claims grew to 459,000, but the decline has been clearly evident ever since. Even Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan commented recently that he believes the decline in the job market has stabilized. Some credit the increased confidence in the economy to the tax cuts passed by Congress and signed into law by President Bush last year. Unemployment, which was as high as 6.4 percent over last summer, fell to 5.9 percent by the end of 2003. However, economists have long contended that the job market is the slowest part of the economy to recover after a recession. Regardless, Talon News has previously reported the economy grew at an astounding 8.2 percent in the third quarter, which was the best since the Reagan administration. And although the fourth quarter is not expected to be that high, the growth rate will likely be close to 5 percent and would propel the economy forward in the new year. A USA Today survey of 57 economists recently predicted 2004 will be the best year for growth in the American economy in a decade and that unemployment will dip to 5.5 percent. Additionally, these economists were unanimous in their belief that Bush will be reelected in 2004 because of the improvements in the economy and the job market. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
NOYB wrote:
Unemployment Claims Lowest Since Bush Became President By Jimmy Moore Talon News January 1, 2004 Unemployment claims dropped last week to the lowest level since George W. Bush was inaugurated president, according to the latest jobless benefits report released by the Labor Department on Wednesday. New unemployment insurance requests fell to 339,000 for the week ending December 27. Jobless claims have not been this low since January 20, 2001, the day President Bush was sworn into office as president of the United States. What's the real count of those still unemployed, those who are underemployed and those who've given up? Biggest numbers since the 1930s, I'd bet. The Bush Economy is a failure. Just like its namesake. -- Email sent to is never read. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: Unemployment Claims Lowest Since Bush Became President By Jimmy Moore Talon News January 1, 2004 Unemployment claims dropped last week to the lowest level since George W. Bush was inaugurated president, according to the latest jobless benefits report released by the Labor Department on Wednesday. New unemployment insurance requests fell to 339,000 for the week ending December 27. Jobless claims have not been this low since January 20, 2001, the day President Bush was sworn into office as president of the United States. What's the real count of those still unemployed, those who are underemployed and those who've given up? Biggest numbers since the 1930s, I'd bet. The Bush Economy is a failure. Just like its namesake. Or... the dems are a failure and this time next year there will not be many in office! Good news for America. Bob 4 more Jr. and 8 Jeb Can Senior run again? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can Senior run again?
Yes That good to hear. I've always admired George H.W. Bush. He was good to the Coast Guard when I was on active duty. The "coasties" always helped him out in Kennebunkport whenever he asked. Butch Ammon |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert White" wrote in message news:H1FJb.2581 Can Senior run again? Yes |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Butch Ammon" wrote in message That good to hear. Of course, 41 would be eighty-four in '08. Hardly likely. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... What's the real count of those still unemployed, those who are underemployed and those who've given up? Biggest numbers since the 1930s, I'd bet. The Bush Economy is a failure. Just like its namesake. What the heck is "underemployed?" And, why are you posting through a German news server? Bert |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 19:57:27 -0500, "Bert Robbins"
wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... What's the real count of those still unemployed, those who are underemployed and those who've given up? Biggest numbers since the 1930s, I'd bet. The Bush Economy is a failure. Just like its namesake. What the heck is "underemployed?" And, why are you posting through a German news server? The Berlin server is probably the best text only free news server on the planet hands down. No binaries, the retention is excellant and they are right on top of posts - almost no delay. It's a good server. Later, Tom S. Woodstock, CT ---------- "I object to fishing tournaments less for what they do to fish than what they do to fishermen." Ted Williams - 1964 |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 18:37:16 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: Unemployment Claims Lowest Since Bush Became President By Jimmy Moore Talon News January 1, 2004 Unemployment claims dropped last week to the lowest level since George W. Bush was inaugurated president, according to the latest jobless benefits report released by the Labor Department on Wednesday. Please have your polyana-ish predictors help our local economy.... we need the help..... in 1Q 2004 predictions 13% will hire new workers (there's your good figures to quote) and 23% will lay off..... 2:42 PM EST Wednesday Triad's unemployment rate rises in November The unemployment rate for the eight-county Triad Metropolitan Statistical Area was 6 percent in November, up from 5.8 percent in October, according to statistics released Wednesday by the state's Employment Security Commission. In all, rates rose in 86 of the 100 North Carolina counties, though ESC Chairman Harry Payne Jr. said he wasn't worried by the monthly results. "Minor monthly fluctuations in the unemployment rates are not unusual," he said. "In fact, economic trends still point the way of modest employment growth across our state." The state's unemployment rate was 6.2 percent in November, up from 6.1 percent in October. The Charlotte metro area had a 6.9 percent unemployment rate, up from 6.6 percent in October, while the Raleigh/Durham area posted a November unemployment rate of 4.3 percent, up from 4.1 percent in October. Guilford County remained one of the counties receiving the most unemployment insurance benefits, ranking third behind Mecklenburg and Wake counties. Guilford residents received $4.5 million in unemployment benefits in November, the ESC said. This was despite the fact that the unemployment rate in Guilford County actually decreased in the last month. Here's a county-by-county breakdown of November unemployment rates in the 12-county greater Triad compared to October rates: Alamance: 6.7 percent, up from 6.4 percent; Caswell: 8.4 percent, down from 8.5 percent; Davidson: 8.2 percent, up from 7.5 percent; Davie: 5.8 percent, up from 5 percent; Forsyth: 5.3 percent, up from 4.9 percent; Guilford: 5.8 percent, down from 6 percent; Montgomery: 8.8 percent, up from 8.3 percent; Randolph: 5.5 percent, up from 5.2 percent; Rockingham: 10.2 percent, up from 9.9 percent; Stokes: 6.1 percent, up from 5.5 percent; Surry: 7.7 percent, up from 7.2 percent; Yadkin: 5.9 percent, up from 5.7 percent. Financial services tanks... http://triad.bizjournals.com/triad/s...22/story1.html and this is our best effort to try and stem the tide...... http://triad.bizjournals.com/triad/s...08/daily4.html for workers displaced from NAFTA disasters that were making $25/hr now hoping to make from $7-$10/hr.... just to keep their heads above water. Note that not only do I have hourly employees in my classes, I have at least one ex-mill owner. In his words.... "I could have stayed in business if I wanted to move to China, but who the f*ck wants to live in China?" It might also help to point out that he and his partner in the (failed) knitting mill were naturalized citizens..... when America *was* a place people wanted to move to make a good living. Now, it is just better than China. Gack. (Oh, yeah, by the way...... the mill was successful from the late 60's until NAFTA.) Can you imagine the far reaching effects this has on a state's tax base? Your polyana-ish outlook on the economy distresses me...... but not as much as the human suffering does that was created by poor political/economic decisions. Quit posting half-truths... it does nothing for your credibility. You know what, Gene? I believe you've made up your mind that the economy stinks, and no statistic will convince you otherwise. The loss of manufacturing jobs has very little to do with the economy, and more to do with free trade in a world economy. In fact, during Bush's watch, and despite a recession, almost every jobs sector has had a net gain in jobs except for manufacturing.. That being said, manufacturing just posted its biggest month of growth in two decades. http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp..._ge/economy_11 Manufacturing Sees Best Month in Decades Sat Jan 3, 1:35 PM ET By ADAM GELLER, AP Business Writer NEW YORK - The nation's manufacturing sector, thrashed by the recession and achingly slow to recover, finished 2003 with its most robust month of growth in two decades. The Institute for Supply Management reported Friday that its manufacturing index jumped to 66.2 in December from 62.8 the previous month, strong evidence that the economic turnaround continues to pick up steam. The new figure was the highest since December 1983 for a sector that has shed millions of jobs over the past three years. The reading, which marks the sixth consecutive month of expansion in manufacturing, was significantly higher than the 61 forecast by analysts. An index reading above 50 indicates expansion; one below 50 indicates that manufacturing activity is contracting. From March through June, the manufacturing index was below 50. Economists said the index shows that while the beleaguered factory sector still has much ground to make up, it is now firmly in recovery mode, helped along by low interest rates and a falling dollar that makes U.S.-produced goods cheaper overseas. "Manufacturing is really the last piece of the puzzle that is falling in place to produce broad-based, sustained economic growth," said Sung Won Sohn, chief economist with Wells Fargo & Co. in Minneapolis. The momentum is particularly evident in new orders to factories, said Norbert J. Ore, chairman of the institute's manufacturing business survey committee. A component index tracking new orders reached its highest level since 1950, rising to 77.6 in December from 73.7 in November, he said. "The strength in December's data provides significant encouragement for prospects in the first quarter of 2004," Ore said. An index measuring factory production also rose, to 73 from 68.3 in November. ISM's measure of factory employment rose to 55.5 from 51. Of the 20 industries making up the sector, 17 reported growth, led by instruments and photographic equipment, leather and furniture. Two industries, paper and chemicals, did not see a pickup in their business. ISM did not gather enough responses from the last remaining industry, petroleum, to gauge growth. "The month-over-month growth from November to December indicates a rapid recovery taking place in the sector, though there are still some businesses lagging and wondering when they will see the improvement that others are experiencing," Ore said. But economist Sohn noted that the growth comes in a sector that remains far from what it was a few years ago, with millions of jobs lost. Job growth at factories will continue to be limited in the coming year, with manufacturing continuing to shift overseas, he said. Stocks rose strongly following the release of the report, but major indexes ended the mixed after a bout of late-day selling. The Dow Jones industrial average ended 44 points lower at 10,410. Broader stock indicators were mixed. The Standard & Poor's 500 index fell 3 points to 1,108, while the Nasdaq composite index was up 3 points at 2,007 |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bert Robbins wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... What's the real count of those still unemployed, those who are underemployed and those who've given up? Biggest numbers since the 1930s, I'd bet. The Bush Economy is a failure. Just like its namesake. What the heck is "underemployed?" Insufficiently employed, not used to the optimum capacity. Chiefly of persons or machinery. As when a top industrial designer is laid off, cannot find new work in his field, and is forced to accept a job doing whatever it is you do for a living. And, why are you posting through a German news server? Bert Because it is a great news server and offers portability. Why, does it bother you? If so, why? Why do you post via Comcast? -- Email sent to is never read. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Operation HO, HO, HO - Some OT Good News! | General | |||
More OT Good News! | General | |||
2 year old 2-cycle oil still good | General |