"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...

The release of almost 2000 prisoners after the Abu Grhaib scandal broke
last
spring.
They would never have let these people go
if they had any real evidence they had been shooting at US troops.

And how many of those 2000 are now shooting at our troops and making IEDs?
It's very likely that many more of our soldiers would be alive today if
those 2000 were still in custody.


Meanwhile, we did just *arrest* Sadam, proving we
aren't barbarians, huh?

It will take more than one isolated act to prove, or disprove, our
barbarity.

See Abu Grhaib above.

And how many of those 2000 are now shooting at our troops and making IEDs?


A greater number than would have been if they hadn't been treated to our
hospitality at Abu G.

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
And how many of those 2000 are now shooting at our troops and making
IEDs?


A greater number than would have been if they hadn't been treated to our
hospitality at Abu G.

Nice try, no cigar. We released a lot of baddies to appease the idiot media
and libs. Besides, your reasoning above is a great reason to have kept them
in there. At least until the hostilities are over and the GIs out of there.
After all, there were in there for a reason, eh?

Jack