Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... And that's another whole subject. I have a wireless router and I keep the firewall off because of the XP firewall and a specific firewall to the computer - but... There are several wireless computers surrounding the homestead in other homes and I have been infected several times via that route. I now keep the wireless portion of the router off until I need it. Even then, I keep a Spy Eye running in the background to make sure nobody is piggy backing on me. Later, Tom You know what is strange? I've been using computers and accessing the Internet for years. I've never used any kind of virus protection software. I tried Spyware once because it was free and I was curious, but it screwed up the computer, so I uninstalled it. Other than the WiFi thing I mentioned and one other worm that I got on this computer last winter that I easily removed, I've never had any problems with getting a serious virus or other malady. My wife, on the other hand, has been through several computers and many, many crashes, burns, virus infections, worms etc. It seems every other month her computer needs to be disinfected. She uses Norton, keeps it updated but still whatever computer she has, it eventually gets messed up. We were talking about it one day and determined that I use my computer very differently than she. Hers is on a cable connection and she leaves it connected 24 hours a day. I always disconnect after every use. Also, unlike she, when using Internet Explorer and Outlook Express, I never leave the former open when checking mail or the newsgroups on OE. The only time I open Internet Explorer is to quickly read news, search for something or do whatever I need it for, then immediately close it. I don't know enough about computers to be 100% convinced that my habits make a difference, but I know I don't seem to have the problems she and others have, even when they are using current anti-virus software. Eisboch |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 08:39:06 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message .. . And that's another whole subject. I have a wireless router and I keep the firewall off because of the XP firewall and a specific firewall to the computer - but... There are several wireless computers surrounding the homestead in other homes and I have been infected several times via that route. I now keep the wireless portion of the router off until I need it. Even then, I keep a Spy Eye running in the background to make sure nobody is piggy backing on me. Later, Tom You know what is strange? I've been using computers and accessing the Internet for years. I've never used any kind of virus protection software. I tried Spyware once because it was free and I was curious, but it screwed up the computer, so I uninstalled it. Other than the WiFi thing I mentioned and one other worm that I got on this computer last winter that I easily removed, I've never had any problems with getting a serious virus or other malady. My wife, on the other hand, has been through several computers and many, many crashes, burns, virus infections, worms etc. It seems every other month her computer needs to be disinfected. She uses Norton, keeps it updated but still whatever computer she has, it eventually gets messed up. We were talking about it one day and determined that I use my computer very differently than she. Hers is on a cable connection and she leaves it connected 24 hours a day. I always disconnect after every use. Also, unlike she, when using Internet Explorer and Outlook Express, I never leave the former open when checking mail or the newsgroups on OE. The only time I open Internet Explorer is to quickly read news, search for something or do whatever I need it for, then immediately close it. I don't know enough about computers to be 100% convinced that my habits make a difference, but I know I don't seem to have the problems she and others have, even when they are using current anti-virus software. You know, as long as I've been associated with these beasts, I've never used your regimen in terms of shutting off OE and IE in concert with each activity. I'm going to start doing that. I usually shut the computer off when I'm away for a while but I rarely shut off the modem or put it into standby when I leave the computer running. I think I should start making that a habit also. On another subject, what kind of Scout do you have? I really like those boats. Later, Tom |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On another subject, what kind of Scout do you have? I really like those boats. Later, Tom It's the 20' "Sportfish" model, powered by a Yamaha 200 hp 4-stoke. It's set up with a T-top, rocket launchers, several gunnel rod holders, live bait well - all the fishing type stuff. I bought it at the end of the 2003 season up in MA because the dealer was vacating his location and had to sell off the inventory, so I got a good deal (I think). I towed it down here to Florida last fall and have not used it here yet. It still has 4 hours on the engine. Hopefully, after I repair all the hurricane damage I'll have some time to put some hours on it. Eisboch Eisboch |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 09:18:45 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message .. . On another subject, what kind of Scout do you have? I really like those boats. It's the 20' "Sportfish" model, powered by a Yamaha 200 hp 4-stoke. It's set up with a T-top, rocket launchers, several gunnel rod holders, live bait well - all the fishing type stuff. Very nice. Similar to my Ranger if I'm not mistaken. Hmmmmm - I feel a need to visit Florida after Christmas. :) I bought it at the end of the 2003 season up in MA because the dealer was vacating his location and had to sell off the inventory, so I got a good deal (I think). I towed it down here to Florida last fall and have not used it here yet. It still has 4 hours on the engine. Hopefully, after I repair all the hurricane damage I'll have some time to put some hours on it. A lot of damage? Later, Tom |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message news:1102341159.88ea84eb27b7dd159f5524a3aeb2213c@t eranews... Two weeks ago, my wife said her computer was slowing again, and she was plagued with pop-ups. The offender turned out to be a nice little routine that Yahoo offers to install for you to make your searching easier or more fun. It's called Target. Has nothing to do with the stores. Once I got it off her machine, the problems stopped. I suppose it eventually had to happen - the commercialization of the Internet. I refuse to get so wrapped up in protecting a computer from hackers and various forms of infection that it becomes a daily chore. If the day comes that I can't use it - I won't. Eisboch |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well
You need to run several programs to catch it all but there is enough good freeware you dont have to buy anything. Ad Aware seems very thorough to me You need to check for new config files everytime you run it. "Harry Krause" wrote in message news:1102338552.2892938c1cffa66db4748321c864df7c@t eranews... Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 07:46:53 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 06:58:36 -0500, "scott downey" wrote: Everyone should run Ad Aware and SpyBot to remove all the cruddy spyware coming in off the net. My daughter installed a screen saver and there was so much attached spyware her computer could barely function I got news for you - Adaware and SpyBot didn't get half of the spyware on that computer. You need to add Pest Patrol and No Adaware and forget about SpyBot. SpyBot is useless. Uh... care to expand on this theory of yours? I use SpyBot from time to time in conjunction with an anti-adware program and they both seem to find what they are supposed to find. What's so terrific about the two you are recommending? I bought into the SpyBot/Adaware freeware concept and relied on them to keep things out of the computer. Based on the first results, I even sent the guy who developed SpyBot $25 I was that impressed. Then I noticed that something was amiss - the computer started acting strange again - popups and the spam started to escalate. Then I got whacked in an email trojan on a .jpg that Norton missed (which is a whole 'nother story) and was passed by a member of a lure maker/rod building mailing list I'm a member of. Couldn't get rid of it. SpyBot never caught it and neither did Adaware. Norton would catch it on a scan, but couldn't delete or quarantine it. I started looking around researching the trojan and came across Pest Patrol. Bought it and WOW - what a difference!! 168 - count'em - 1 6 8 bugs, trojans, spys and such - a bunch of them bugs that SpyBot was supposed to eliminate. Since then, run side by side with SpyBot, Pest Patrol has caught much more than SpyBot - most of it in the form of cookies which execute spys. It's the same with Noadaware - much better performance and it actually does what it says it does. Like I said, I wouldn't give you ten cents for SpyBot - lesson learned. Later, Tom Well, I just ran AdAware, which found one "possible" browser hijack routine...I let it ride. Then I downloaded and launched No Adware, which found nothing. I'll fool aroud with No Adware for a while. It is faster than AdAware. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 09:23:43 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message news:1102341159.88ea84eb27b7dd159f5524a3aeb2213c@ teranews... Two weeks ago, my wife said her computer was slowing again, and she was plagued with pop-ups. The offender turned out to be a nice little routine that Yahoo offers to install for you to make your searching easier or more fun. It's called Target. Has nothing to do with the stores. Once I got it off her machine, the problems stopped. I suppose it eventually had to happen - the commercialization of the Internet. I refuse to get so wrapped up in protecting a computer from hackers and various forms of infection that it becomes a daily chore. If the day comes that I can't use it - I won't. I think you would be surprised at how much it has intruded into the everyday functions of life. It's simply amazing. Later, Tom - who is killing time waiting to head out for three DR appointments - one of which is my daughter-in-law who I am taking out to lunch. :) Later, Tom |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 09:26:40 -0500, "scott downey"
wrote: Well You need to run several programs to catch it all but there is enough good freeware you dont have to buy anything. No there isn't. Ad Aware seems very thorough to me Not by half. You need to check for new config files everytime you run it. What - you think I'm a newbie? ~~ sheesh ~~ Later, Tom |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 09:38:38 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 09:26:40 -0500, "scott downey" wrote: Well You need to run several programs to catch it all but there is enough good freeware you dont have to buy anything. No there isn't. Ad Aware seems very thorough to me Not by half. You need to check for new config files everytime you run it. What - you think I'm a newbie? ~~ sheesh ~~ Not at your age. That's true enough. :) Later, Tom |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You have to tell XP to not be the default CD writer. I had the same
problem using Auto-Grabber. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bwahaha! Bye Bye Bushy! | ASA | |||
DESIGNING PORTAL CREATION DATABASE SHOPPING CART ANIMAT | General |