![]() |
Win XP Pro...totally worthless information...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message news:1102269099.4qsvEFS3LJXCi87mfPUrSA@teranews... I fixed up my crashed server and also decided it was time to clean up my main desktop machine, so... I bit the bullet and did a clean install of WinXP Professional. It went smoothly, with no error messages, and I've reinstalled the application software I actually use. I suppose this is only a sideways step from Win2k, which I had been using on this machine. There are a couple of nice new features on XP that weren't offered on Win2k, though. But not enough to induce anyone to buy XP Pro. WinXP incluides a basic firewall which seems robust enough to resist probes from the usual test sites. FWIW, I've had XP Pro on this (the Florida laptop) for over three years and have never had a problem with it. I prefer it to the older Windows programs, although I've heard others feel differently. I keep it updated, including the SP2 release. Eisboch |
I too have been running WinXP or a few years. Have had to re-install a few
times but that's mostly because I do lots of development work, install and uninstall all types of software. I find a reinstall every 6 to 12 months to be a nice way to clean up the system. It's a bit of a pain but OK by me. I like WinXP. Serice pack 2 certainly seems quite secure with it's firewall. I used to use zonealarm. Computer Associates is giving a 12 month (12 month!) free trial of their anti-virus & firewall software, so that's what I'm using there. And a helpful site for WIndows fixes, etc. www.Annoyances.org Peace Out, Gary |
"Eisboch" wrote in message .. . "Harry Krause" wrote in message news:1102269099.4qsvEFS3LJXCi87mfPUrSA@teranews... I fixed up my crashed server and also decided it was time to clean up my main desktop machine, so... I bit the bullet and did a clean install of WinXP Professional. It went smoothly, with no error messages, and I've reinstalled the application software I actually use. I suppose this is only a sideways step from Win2k, which I had been using on this machine. There are a couple of nice new features on XP that weren't offered on Win2k, though. But not enough to induce anyone to buy XP Pro. WinXP incluides a basic firewall which seems robust enough to resist probes from the usual test sites. FWIW, I've had XP Pro on this (the Florida laptop) for over three years and have never had a problem with it. I prefer it to the older Windows programs, although I've heard others feel differently. I keep it updated, including the SP2 release. Eisboch We run XP Home on all 4 family computers and have not had any problems with the application. We also installed SP2 when it was released this summer and have seen no negatives as a result. The automatic update feature is also a plus. As we run Zone Alarm Pro as our firewall and Avast Pro v 4.5 as our anti virus we disabled the firewall and AV features on SP2. A couple of anti spyware programs you should consider installing are Ad-Aware Personal Edition (free at http://www.lavasoftusa.com/software/adaware/ ), Spybot Search and Destroy (free at http://www.safer-networking.org/en/index.html ) and Spyware Doctor. |
The XP firewall won't stop a rouge program (or spyware, or virus) from
phoning home. It only stop stuff coming from outside. "Harry Krause" wrote in message news:1102269099.4qsvEFS3LJXCi87mfPUrSA@teranews... I fixed up my crashed server and also decided it was time to clean up my main desktop machine, so... I bit the bullet and did a clean install of WinXP Professional. It went smoothly, with no error messages, and I've reinstalled the application software I actually use. I suppose this is only a sideways step from Win2k, which I had been using on this machine. There are a couple of nice new features on XP that weren't offered on Win2k, though. But not enough to induce anyone to buy XP Pro. WinXP incluides a basic firewall which seems robust enough to resist probes from the usual test sites. |
Everyone should run Ad Aware and SpyBot to remove all the cruddy spyware
coming in off the net. My daughter installed a screen saver and there was so much attached spyware her computer could barely function "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Chuck Tribolet wrote: The XP firewall won't stop a rouge program (or spyware, or virus) from phoning home. It only stop stuff coming from outside. "Harry Krause" wrote in message news:1102269099.4qsvEFS3LJXCi87mfPUrSA@teranews... I fixed up my crashed server and also decided it was time to clean up my main desktop machine, so... I bit the bullet and did a clean install of WinXP Professional. It went smoothly, with no error messages, and I've reinstalled the application software I actually use. I suppose this is only a sideways step from Win2k, which I had been using on this machine. There are a couple of nice new features on XP that weren't offered on Win2k, though. But not enough to induce anyone to buy XP Pro. WinXP incluides a basic firewall which seems robust enough to resist probes from the usual test sites. thanks for the tip, Chuck. I just turned off the XP firewall and reinstalled the one I usually use. Of course, the whole mess is now sitting behind my server and hardware firewall... |
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 06:58:36 -0500, "scott downey"
wrote: Everyone should run Ad Aware and SpyBot to remove all the cruddy spyware coming in off the net. My daughter installed a screen saver and there was so much attached spyware her computer could barely function I got news for you - Adaware and SpyBot didn't get half of the spyware on that computer. You need to add Pest Patrol and No Adaware and forget about SpyBot. SpyBot is useless. Later, Tom |
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 07:36:58 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 06:58:36 -0500, "scott downey" wrote: Everyone should run Ad Aware and SpyBot to remove all the cruddy spyware coming in off the net. My daughter installed a screen saver and there was so much attached spyware her computer could barely function I got news for you - Adaware and SpyBot didn't get half of the spyware on that computer. You need to add Pest Patrol and No Adaware and forget about SpyBot. SpyBot is useless. I believe our friend Tom frequents places he shouldn't...and picks up doses of things polite folks don't mention in public! Excuse me? Or you? In fact, most of the spys were from the NYT, Washington Post and all the little marine places I visit - all the ones that Adaware and SpyBot didn't get that is. Pest Patrol got them all - every last one of them. As far as SpyBot - it's slower than hell and misses more than you might think. Later, Tom |
"Harry Krause" wrote in message news:1102336618.09d33faec01ccec4b377cac6c4f8bed9@t eranews... I believe our friend Tom frequents places he shouldn't...and picks up doses of things polite folks don't mention in public! This past summer I had a new laptop on the Navigator. I bought it because it had a built in WiFi setup and the marina had WiFi service. Within a month, I picked up some kind of worm, bug, virus, disease or whatever that affected the search engines. Once in a while, instead of displaying the results of my search, it would direct the computer to a porn site. I really have no interest in these sites and had never purposely visited any, but somehow the computer became infected with something. Since then, I've learned more about WiFi service and it seems you have to be very careful. Other people can apparently piggy-back on your computer to gain access to the Internet. Since switching to Firefox on that computer, I have had no further problems. That reminds me. I've got to download Firefox and Thunderbird and install them on this laptop. Eisboch |
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 07:46:53 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 06:58:36 -0500, "scott downey" wrote: Everyone should run Ad Aware and SpyBot to remove all the cruddy spyware coming in off the net. My daughter installed a screen saver and there was so much attached spyware her computer could barely function I got news for you - Adaware and SpyBot didn't get half of the spyware on that computer. You need to add Pest Patrol and No Adaware and forget about SpyBot. SpyBot is useless. Uh... care to expand on this theory of yours? I use SpyBot from time to time in conjunction with an anti-adware program and they both seem to find what they are supposed to find. What's so terrific about the two you are recommending? I bought into the SpyBot/Adaware freeware concept and relied on them to keep things out of the computer. Based on the first results, I even sent the guy who developed SpyBot $25 I was that impressed. Then I noticed that something was amiss - the computer started acting strange again - popups and the spam started to escalate. Then I got whacked in an email trojan on a .jpg that Norton missed (which is a whole 'nother story) and was passed by a member of a lure maker/rod building mailing list I'm a member of. Couldn't get rid of it. SpyBot never caught it and neither did Adaware. Norton would catch it on a scan, but couldn't delete or quarantine it. I started looking around researching the trojan and came across Pest Patrol. Bought it and WOW - what a difference!! 168 - count'em - 1 6 8 bugs, trojans, spys and such - a bunch of them bugs that SpyBot was supposed to eliminate. Since then, run side by side with SpyBot, Pest Patrol has caught much more than SpyBot - most of it in the form of cookies which execute spys. It's the same with Noadaware - much better performance and it actually does what it says it does. Like I said, I wouldn't give you ten cents for SpyBot - lesson learned. Later, Tom |
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 07:53:59 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message news:1102336618.09d33faec01ccec4b377cac6c4f8bed9@ teranews... I believe our friend Tom frequents places he shouldn't...and picks up doses of things polite folks don't mention in public! This past summer I had a new laptop on the Navigator. I bought it because it had a built in WiFi setup and the marina had WiFi service. Within a month, I picked up some kind of worm, bug, virus, disease or whatever that affected the search engines. Once in a while, instead of displaying the results of my search, it would direct the computer to a porn site. I really have no interest in these sites and had never purposely visited any, but somehow the computer became infected with something. Since then, I've learned more about WiFi service and it seems you have to be very careful. Other people can apparently piggy-back on your computer to gain access to the Internet. Since switching to Firefox on that computer, I have had no further problems. That reminds me. I've got to download Firefox and Thunderbird and install them on this laptop. And that's another whole subject. I have a wireless router and I keep the firewall off because of the XP firewall and a specific firewall to the computer - but... There are several wireless computers surrounding the homestead in other homes and I have been infected several times via that route. I now keep the wireless portion of the router off until I need it. Even then, I keep a Spy Eye running in the background to make sure nobody is piggy backing on me. Later, Tom |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com