Harry Krause wrote:
K. Smith wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:

Gould 0738 wrote:

Now, if we can only get RI and MA off their respective butts and start
on making Narragansett Bay and in particular Greenwich Bay cleaner,
we'll be all set. :)



The key really is funding.

One highly effective way to prevent environmental concerns from
screwing up
the works for commerce and industry is to pass a very comprehensive
sounding set of
projects and restorations. This will tend to silence and disband the
critics.
All subject to funding, of course, and when the funding never
appears the end
result is the same as though there had never been anything passed in
the first
place. Works well for those who will be financially inconvenienced
by any
change in the status quo.





How can we fund environmental cleanup when there are still A-rabs to
kill?

That sound you hear...it's the USA, going down the toilet.


Firstly, I for one would like to sincerely thank our well known
political OT team lying hui union & gui spam for confining their OT
political rants to just another response to a genuine ON topic thread.

This is much less annoying than starting your usual day's load of
OT political rubbish & genuine thanks again, we appreciate it blokes
we really do, please stick with it:-).

As for the subject of the thread; I think waterway pollution as it
applies to us should be strictly polluter pays which means retail
purchasers of resultant goods/services pay. Yes, yes I can hear the
farm lobby but so what???



THe biggest contributors to waterway pollution include industries
dumping their waste directly into creeks that lead to waterways, farm
runoff (fertilizer, pesticides and animal wastes0, runoff from
ineffective sewage treatment facilities, and coal-burning plants whose
emissions fall onto everything. Recreational boats are not much of a
problem.

Now here's a worry; we agree!!!!!:-)

Thing is all polluters should just have regs enacted that say they
can't do that anymore. Trouble is you & your union mates say you are a
special cases, cases you are special you aint.

So just like the OB motors, let people make their own choices & make
those choices on a rational basis, i.e. the real non socialised cost or
each alternative, all of which equally comply with the regs.


So, once again, Ms. Head of Many Snakes, you have no idea what you are
talking about, and, of course, you continue to pollute most of your
posts here with those slimey, stupid, ineffectual and lying insults that
probably coincide with the vague memory of your faded monthly cycles,
oozed on by liberal doses of alcohol.

Dear dear dear you are a sick puppy, most school boys have grown out of
this sort of stuff before long pants, I guess you can't wear them
because .... well your right hand??:

K