Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Natty Bumppo" wrote in message
om... I'm writing a short story for a class...it takes place in the Pacific Northwest and I would really appreciate help with an answer to this question: Is it possible and likely for a small boat to paddle or row a great distance up the Columbia River? I'm trying to decide how a small group or early 19th-century travellers might make it upriver from Vancouver, Washington to a location near present-day Walla Walla, Washington...but I don't know anything about paddling or rowing upriver on the Columbia. Would they row? Could they? Getting upriver in the beginning of the 19th century (how Lewis and Clark or the Hudson's Bay brigades traveled) was in, I think, largish pirogues or York boats. Propulsion was by a method that fit the season, the weather, your payload, and the particular section of the river. Springtime would be the worst, fighting strong currernts and dodging floating logs and debris. Getting upstream should get progressively easier as the summer progressed. If your party is traveling upriver to settle, they'll have to leave late enough to make the upriver trip and arrive early enough to prepare for winter. Preparing for winter in Walla Walla should be a lot easier than for winter in a lot of places I can think of. You're on your own for inventing shelter and food supply for them. For propulsion, I suppose sail was preferred. Next was the oar, probably by rowers sitting side by side. It shouldn't take more than a couple of clicks on Google to get typical number of seats. Where swift current combined with exposed gravel banks, they cordelled, a 19th century word that's been replaced by 'tracking.' To cordel upriver, the brigade walks and climbs along the bank, drawing the boat with a line. Maybe a rudder- or pole-man in the boat kept the boat clear of the bank and obstacles. To get around some particular obstruction or to get up shallow stretches, maybe they'd pole. Maybe they'd cordel wading. As a last resort, they'd portage, unloading the boats, packing the cargo on their backs. I doubt that there are any portages on the stretch of the Columbia you're interested in. Travel like this would be heavy. It would have to be a pretty large and well-financed party to do it. Small-party live-off-the-land-firearm-axe-sleeping-robe travel would probably be by bark canoe with the same propulsion sail+paddle+cordel+pole. Unless it was a large canoe, paddling would be much less effective that rowing, and travel would be arduous. Keep in mind that travel this way took very unusual people. The voyageurs could run a 200 pound pack a couple of miles across a portage or row for sixteen hours a day for weeks at a stretch. To get a party of ordinary human beings up the Columbia would take an heroic fictional leap. I think that if you Googled Lewis & Clark, Columbia River, and Hudson's Bay Company travel for the era you're interested in, you'll be able to assemble a plausible story that would satisfy all but an expert in the field. Best, of course, would be for you to drop out of school for a year, get a canoe and a pole, and travel the river. Post your TR here. Hth, Fred Klingener |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dictionary of Paddling Terms :-) | Touring | |||
Dictionary of Paddling Terms :-) | General | |||
Along with Chuck's story, here's another one where things went wrong... | General | |||
Thoughts on volume (CFS) and river levels and such (sort of rambling) | General |