|
Oh, this is going to be great fun!
"Harry Krause" wrote in message news:1100721607.8Tpj2ssjJbKI3y7MZB6Uzw@teranews... The New Face of National Security By Dan Froomkin Special to washingtonpost.com Wednesday, November 17, 2004; 12:20 PM Stephen J. Hadley, who President Bush yesterday named his new national security adviser, Ahhhh. Good. Another "Vulcan" on Bush's foreign policy team. |
|
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message news:1100721607.8Tpj2ssjJbKI3y7MZB6Uzw@teranews... The New Face of National Security By Dan Froomkin Special to washingtonpost.com Wednesday, November 17, 2004; 12:20 PM Stephen J. Hadley, who President Bush yesterday named his new national security adviser, Ahhhh. Good. Another "Vulcan" on Bush's foreign policy team. Perhaps your children will be among the first drafted into the Army of Jesusville and sent to some overseas hellhole because Bush has decided to win this war on *his* watch, there will be no overseas hellhole by the time my kids are draft age. Sure, there may be some nuclear wasteland formerly known as the Middle East...but there'll be nobody left to fight over there. |
"Harry Krause" wrote in message news:1100730046.jCntqjrXzYaUz0DWhjscbQ@teranews... NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message news:1100721607.8Tpj2ssjJbKI3y7MZB6Uzw@teranews... The New Face of National Security By Dan Froomkin Special to washingtonpost.com Wednesday, November 17, 2004; 12:20 PM Stephen J. Hadley, who President Bush yesterday named his new national security adviser, Ahhhh. Good. Another "Vulcan" on Bush's foreign policy team. Perhaps your children will be among the first drafted into the Army of Jesusville and sent to some overseas hellhole because Bush has decided to win this war on *his* watch, there will be no overseas hellhole by the time my kids are draft age. Sure, there may be some nuclear wasteland formerly known as the Middle East...but there'll be nobody left to fight over there. Maybe they'll be in Tampa, shooting up dentists' offices. Good thing I didn't set up shop in Tampa! |
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:24:59 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: Maybe they'll be in Tampa, shooting up dentists' offices. And then had the gall to call someone else 'sick'. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
Harry shows all the symptoms of narcissism.
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:24:59 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: Maybe they'll be in Tampa, shooting up dentists' offices. And then had the gall to call someone else 'sick'. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Hey...when we are hit again, I'm hoping it isn't in a blue zone. The really funny thing is that is your attitude...if the US is hit again, that's how you would react. Sick. |
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:46:46 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: Gould 0738 wrote: Hey...when we are hit again, I'm hoping it isn't in a blue zone. The really funny thing is that is your attitude...if the US is hit again, that's how you would react. Sick. The nuclear bomb being assembled in Mexico by Al Qaida and intended for explosion in the United States is very likely headed to Texas. It is supposed to be smuggled across the unguarded border, but once in the US its likely they won't want to move it very far and risk detection. Texas has an unguarded border, it's the home state of George Bush, and would be consistent with the pre-election pronouncement from Al-Qaida that "only certain states are our enemies." That can be understand to be nations, or, literally states. Setting of a nuke in Texas would symbolize a serious penis waving at GWB- something likely to appeal to bin Ladin. Wow...how many megatons? Asshole Regards John S To live forever in infamy, the liar: On Sun, 07 Nov 2004 11:36:57 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: I'd be delighted to see the non-boaters leave, even if they slam the door behind them, and get this newsgroup back on topic, or at least on pleasant topics. |
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:20:40 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message news:1100721607.8Tpj2ssjJbKI3y7MZB6Uzw@teranews... The New Face of National Security By Dan Froomkin Special to washingtonpost.com Wednesday, November 17, 2004; 12:20 PM Stephen J. Hadley, who President Bush yesterday named his new national security adviser, Ahhhh. Good. Another "Vulcan" on Bush's foreign policy team. Perhaps your children will be among the first drafted into the Army of Jesusville and sent to some overseas hellhole because Bush has decided to win this war on *his* watch, there will be no overseas hellhole by the time my kids are draft age. Sure, there may be some nuclear wasteland formerly known as the Middle East...but there'll be nobody left to fight over there. Maybe they'll be in Tampa, shooting up dentists' offices. They might be at your office shooting lame ass up. Regards John S To live forever in infamy, the biggest liar of rec.boats got caught in his own words: On Sun, 07 Nov 2004 11:36:57 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: "I'd be delighted to see the non-boaters leave, even if they slam the door behind them, and get this newsgroup back on topic, or at least on pleasant topics." |
|
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Hey...when we are hit again, I'm hoping it isn't in a blue zone. The really funny thing is that is your attitude...if the US is hit again, that's how you would react. Sick. The nuclear bomb being assembled in Mexico by Al Qaida and intended for explosion in the United States is very likely headed to Texas. It is supposed to be smuggled across the unguarded border, but once in the US its likely they won't want to move it very far and risk detection. They'll probably try to use Vancouver as an entry point again. |
"NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... They'll probably try to use Vancouver as an entry point again. That was one incident. Most of your terrorists enter without passing through Canada. Your borders aren't exactly watertight. |
"Harry Krause" wrote in message Some decades in the future, when what's left of our society tries to pick up the pieces, that'll be considered the beginning of the end. Why, do you think the liberals are going to regain control? Let's hope not. Jack |
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Why, do you think the liberals are going to regain control? Let's hope not. Jack Perish the thought. Why should the government be run by thinkers, vs. "believers"? That was a funny one Chuck! Thanks for the good laugh. |
Perish the thought. Why should the government be run by thinkers, vs.
"believers"? That was a funny one Chuck! Thanks for the good laugh. It seems you believed it was humorous. You're welcome. |
Gould,
Liberals think were their heart instead of their intellect. They will allow their desire to do good, to override the facts concerning the ineffective programs that fail to achieve there desired results. "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Perish the thought. Why should the government be run by thinkers, vs. "believers"? That was a funny one Chuck! Thanks for the good laugh. It seems you believed it was humorous. You're welcome. |
"Dr. Dr. Smithers" wrote in message news:jf7nd.630555$8_6.18760@attbi_s04... Gould, Liberals think were their heart instead of their intellect. They will allow their desire to do good, to override the facts concerning the ineffective programs that fail to achieve there desired results. They tend to be static thinkers.......that any change implemented by their policies will not result in any change by the population............ "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Perish the thought. Why should the government be run by thinkers, vs. "believers"? That was a funny one Chuck! Thanks for the good laugh. It seems you believed it was humorous. You're welcome. |
Paul,
I could not follow what you were saying. Try one more time and I will listen closer ; ) .. "P.Fritz" wrote in message ... "Dr. Dr. Smithers" wrote in message news:jf7nd.630555$8_6.18760@attbi_s04... Gould, Liberals think were their heart instead of their intellect. They will allow their desire to do good, to override the facts concerning the ineffective programs that fail to achieve there desired results. They tend to be static thinkers.......that any change implemented by their policies will not result in any change by the population............ "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Perish the thought. Why should the government be run by thinkers, vs. "believers"? That was a funny one Chuck! Thanks for the good laugh. It seems you believed it was humorous. You're welcome. |
"Dr. Dr. Smithers" wrote in message news:9O7nd.630632$8_6.425178@attbi_s04... Paul, I could not follow what you were saying. Try one more time and I will listen closer ; ) . In other words......they don't think that by raising the sales tax, people will alter their spending habits based on that increase....that an increase in capital gains tax will result in less invest (just look at what the luxury tax did to the boat building business) That increasing the welfare check by 300 a month for an additional child will not result in greater welfare births....etc etc. "P.Fritz" wrote in message ... "Dr. Dr. Smithers" wrote in message news:jf7nd.630555$8_6.18760@attbi_s04... Gould, Liberals think were their heart instead of their intellect. They will allow their desire to do good, to override the facts concerning the ineffective programs that fail to achieve there desired results. They tend to be static thinkers.......that any change implemented by their policies will not result in any change by the population............ "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Perish the thought. Why should the government be run by thinkers, vs. "believers"? That was a funny one Chuck! Thanks for the good laugh. It seems you believed it was humorous. You're welcome. |
I completely agree, and is the reason why the concept of cities put an
excessive tax on corporations and workers so they can create a utopian city, will result in jobs moving to the suburbs, a smaller tax base and less tax income for the city. The result will be the city will have to discontinue social services they currently can afford. What they thought would be a great solution, ends up hurting those they want to help. I knew if I listened carefully I could understand it. "P.Fritz" wrote in message ... "Dr. Dr. Smithers" wrote in message news:9O7nd.630632$8_6.425178@attbi_s04... Paul, I could not follow what you were saying. Try one more time and I will listen closer ; ) . In other words......they don't think that by raising the sales tax, people will alter their spending habits based on that increase....that an increase in capital gains tax will result in less invest (just look at what the luxury tax did to the boat building business) That increasing the welfare check by 300 a month for an additional child will not result in greater welfare births....etc etc. "P.Fritz" wrote in message ... "Dr. Dr. Smithers" wrote in message news:jf7nd.630555$8_6.18760@attbi_s04... Gould, Liberals think were their heart instead of their intellect. They will allow their desire to do good, to override the facts concerning the ineffective programs that fail to achieve there desired results. They tend to be static thinkers.......that any change implemented by their policies will not result in any change by the population............ "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Perish the thought. Why should the government be run by thinkers, vs. "believers"? That was a funny one Chuck! Thanks for the good laugh. It seems you believed it was humorous. You're welcome. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:55 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com