On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 21:03:59 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Gould 0738 wrote:
Liberals definitely have a strong case of the fuglies. And they wonder why
they can't get a job!

You take the trophy for the most dim-witted statement of the week, NOYB.

Liberals come in all shapes and sizes, just like people who aren't liberal.

Come to think of it, most Hollywood movie stars are pretty liberal. Do you
consider those folks "fugly"?


It is mildly funny that Herring spent most of his work career hiding out
in the military and the rest of it faking being a substitute teacher,
and yet claims that liberals "can't get a job." Most of the liberals I
know have done far more with their lives in terms of societal and
personal acocmplishment than Herring.

From whence came this? Are we in a different thread here?

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Liberals definitely have a strong case of the fuglies. And they wonder
why
they can't get a job!

You take the trophy for the most dim-witted statement of the week, NOYB.

Liberals come in all shapes and sizes, just like people who aren't
liberal.

Come to think of it, most Hollywood movie stars are pretty liberal. Do you
consider those folks "fugly"?

There are fugly liberals and dumb liberals. Hollywood holds the monopoly on
the dumb liberals.

NOYB wrote:
"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Liberals definitely have a strong case of the fuglies. And they wonder
why
they can't get a job!

You take the trophy for the most dim-witted statement of the week, NOYB.

Liberals come in all shapes and sizes, just like people who aren't
liberal.

Come to think of it, most Hollywood movie stars are pretty liberal. Do you
consider those folks "fugly"?

There are fugly liberals and dumb liberals. Hollywood holds the monopoly on
the dumb liberals.


Many of whom are much brighter than you, and earn as much in a day as
you will earn in a lifetime.

--
A passing thought:

Do more than you're supposed to do and you can have or be or do anything
you want. - Sands, Bill

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Liberals definitely have a strong case of the fuglies. And they wonder
why
they can't get a job!

You take the trophy for the most dim-witted statement of the week, NOYB.

Liberals come in all shapes and sizes, just like people who aren't
liberal.

Come to think of it, most Hollywood movie stars are pretty liberal. Do
you
consider those folks "fugly"?

There are fugly liberals and dumb liberals. Hollywood holds the monopoly
on
the dumb liberals.


Many of whom are much brighter than you, and earn as much in a day as
you will earn in a lifetime.

Nice come back!

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Liberals definitely have a strong case of the fuglies. And they wonder
why
they can't get a job!

You take the trophy for the most dim-witted statement of the week, NOYB.

Liberals come in all shapes and sizes, just like people who aren't
liberal.

Come to think of it, most Hollywood movie stars are pretty liberal. Do
you
consider those folks "fugly"?

There are fugly liberals and dumb liberals. Hollywood holds the monopoly
on
the dumb liberals.


Many of whom are much brighter than you,

Maybe some of them...but not many.

and earn as much in a day as
you will earn in a lifetime.

I didn't realize that a person's income directly correlated to his/her IQ.

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...

You take the trophy for the most dim-witted statement of the week, NOYB.

Liberals come in all shapes and sizes, just like people who aren't
liberal.

Come to think of it, most Hollywood movie stars are pretty liberal. Do you
consider those folks "fugly"?

Do you believe that those who live outside the city limits come in all
shapes and sizes or are they all the same? " Ah yes, Suburbia. Where
everybody lives on a dead end street.
Suburbanities endure private "covenants" requiring them to conform to the
neighbors, so that when it is time to paint the cloned house (with the
cloned landscaping) any thought of individual expression is squelched in
favor of the "public
good." Suburbia, the fantasy consumption neighborhood where the economy
produces nothing and the SUV is a god. Suburbia is a land of economic
imperialism- all wealth and resources in Suburbia are extracted from some
remote area
(the city to which all commute). Suburbia, the primarily lilly white land
of
cultural conformity."

Is it possible that you might have stole the prize from NYOB?

Is it possible that you might have stole the prize from NYOB?


I doubt it. But its beyond possible, in fact it is a demonstrated fact, that
you cannot distinguish between a criticism of living conditions in Suburbia
with a critcism of Subuarbanites.

Or so you would have everyone believe.

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Is it possible that you might have stole the prize from NYOB?


I doubt it. But its beyond possible, in fact it is a demonstrated fact,
that
you cannot distinguish between a criticism of living conditions in
Suburbia
with a critcism of Subuarbanites.

Gould said:
"Suburbia, the fantasy consumption neighborhood where the economy
produces nothing and the SUV is a god. Suburbia is a land of economic
imperialism- all wealth and resources in Suburbia are extracted from some
remote area (the city to which all commute). Suburbia, the primarily lilly
white land
of cultural conformity."

I am ignoring the fact, that your statement is incorrect, but it sure sounds
like a criticism of Suburbanites to me. Imagine if I said,
"Cities, where people live like rats stacked on top of each other, living in
dirt and squalor because they are too lazy to pick up their own trash.
Cities are a land of drug abusers whose god is their next fix. Cities,
where prostitution is rampant. Cities, the primarily land of those who have
failed at life".

Neither one of these statements are correct, but both are criticisms of
those who live in the city or suburbia. For you to say that Suburbanites
elevates an SUV to the status of a god, was a criticism of suburbanites.
The fact that you failed to see that shows how deeply ingrained your bigotry
is. You remind me of racists who say, "I'm not a racist, some of my best
friends are black".

The "excellent" article you highlighted where the other's premise was ""And
we are the real Americans. They--rural, red-state voters, the denizens of
the exurbs--are not real Americans. They are rubes, fools, and
hate-mongers.""

Imagine if I made a post saying here is a excellent web site. Anyone with
an interest in the black vs. white political dynamic will enjoy reading this
excellent, thought-provoking web site. It's loads very slowly, but it is
insightful and worth waiting for. http://www.kkk.bz/index1.htm

A few hours later you said "There's virtually no way this country will ever
come together again. Not as
long as one side or the other thinks that compromise is either an insult to
intelligence or a sin against the Bible. We're in the last generations of
the American Empire, I suspect."

It sounds very similar to the "US vs. Them" mentality that the KKK preaches.
Instead of separating from other American's we need to pull together for our
common welfare.