John, you may or may not know this, but some things can be IMPLIED
with a very high certainty.
If you meant to say "probability" instead of certainty, you may be
correct in your statement. Implication does not provide a probability
of 1, which is required for certainty.
I don't know myself if I'm a conservative or not. I agree with some of
the 'liberal' positions and with some of the 'conservative' positions.
If I must rant and rave and lie and exaggerate to be a liberal, then I
guess I'm not one of those. If I can't donate to a charity and be a
conservative, then I guess I'm not one of those.
You're a right-wing neoCon.
I do find that you and some of the others who follow your thinking
make statements which are easily refutable, if not downright
ridiculous. It is fun to challenge some of the stuff you post.
It is fun to challenge; too bad you aren't equipped to do it with any
wit or panache.
It's also true that some of the 'conservatives' (tuuk, for example)
make ridiculous statements. They also are fun to challenge.