Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 18:33:43 -0500, DSK wrote:
Personally, I object to the flat tax on moral grounds. It is a de facto penalty on the poor, and trivializes tax expense to the super-rich.... who BTW gain the most from gov't services, so shouldn't they pay more? I'd like you to attempt to explain this, if you can. Which government services are in more demand from "rich" people? The rich tend to use their own paid-for services rather than rely on the often inferior services provided by government subsidies. Government services are used mostly by people who cannot afford other alternatives. Do rich people need section 8 housing? Public schools? Healthcare subsidies? Welfare? W.I.C.? Planned parenthood? Social security? I really want to hear this one..... Dave |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Republican myths | General | |||
(ot) Texas Republicans endorse God, squabble, call for dismantling the federal government, await indictments and pray for Bush. | General | |||
DESIGNING PORTAL CREATION DATABASE SHOPPING CART ANIMAT | General | |||
Boat Loans | General |