Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() -- "Clams Canino" wrote in message hlink.net... There are a couple group members that are wealthy enough that 2k would not even begin to tempt them. That would seem to be the 1st choice. So far I like Clams ideas. Although the honor system should work, I would suspect out of ten people there would be a few that would have some reason to ignore a bet made years earlier. I've loaned a lot of people money and I've heard it all. About half of the borrowers have good intentions, but job loss, divorce, health issues or amnesia is common. I am absolutely going to pay if I lose. Lets give this a little thought and see if any others are going to jump in. The people I hoped would take me up haven't responded, but I guess it would grieve me more to have to pay them anyway. Dixon |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() -- "M-Tech" wrote in message ... I'm in. Let me know where you want the $$ sent to. However, we must be CLEAR on the definition of "draft". I've tangled with my share of politically motivated folks over the years and I want a friggin' definition of what YOU mean by "draft" posted here for all to see (cut, save). Don't forget. Kerry was the one talking about "adding" to the troops.....I dont see how that would be possible without a draft. Don Don, I agree with you 100%. I also don't want to see, after the fact, someone else's "definition" of draft. I suppose anything other than volunteer? That leaves me vulnerable to giant sign-up incentives or other types of semi-forced enticement I guess. We should all try to be fair. I also don't want to hear about some new future reason that you will say "but he no choice but to reinstate the draft". I don't want this to be like the seinfeld episode where jerry bets kramer that he won't install multi levels in his apartment. Afterwards kramer decides he really doesn't want levels and says the bet is off. What would your definition be? Dixon |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() -- " Count me in. We don't need anyone to hold the money, these posts are archived on Google. All we have to do is wait until the Presidents term expires, go back to Google and bring the posts back up out of the archives. Then we can make the arrangements for you to pay me. John S John, you sound pretty confident. I wouldn't be that confident if we were talking about no draft until his first term expires. Dixon |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If the
military is used the way it is supposed to be used, and not for nation building or law enforcement, the technology advantage enjoyed by the US military more than makes up for numbers. If. What happens when we use the military for nation building and law enforcement, as we are at the present time? Unless this changes in the future- and it won't for the next four years, we lose the advantage of our technologies. Our most effective technologies were designed to defeat sophisticated weapons systems rather than individual criminal terrorist *******s hiding among a population of innocents. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there someone in the group that is well known by all that would hold the
money? I feel that in four years $2,000.00 might start looking pretty tempting. I believe money orders or cashiers checks don't have an expiration date, but I'll check. Dixon Set up a commercial escrow account. Absolutely neutral third party, written instructions for payment, etc. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bush Wins! | ASA | |||
Harry reveals his true colors! | General | |||
) OT ) Bush's "needless war" | General | |||
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General | |||
A truly great man! | ASA |