| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Synthetic oil versus 2 cycle restrictions
On 24 Dec 2003 08:34:05 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:
(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 23 Dec 2003 10:26:16 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 20 Dec 2003 19:39:11 GMT, ospam (F330 GT) wrote: Most people are under the impression that a 4-stroke is cleaner, but a DFI, such as a late model Evinrude, has fewer total emissions than a late model EFI 4-stroke. The great thing about DFI is that its emission output stays fairly steady throughout the life of the motor. Could that be because the 4-stroke lasts so much longer? Sorry, couldn't resist.;) When it comes to marine engines, I'll bet there's a whole lot more old 2 strokes than 4 strokes. I couldn't resist either. ;) I'll be there isn't. Remember, we're talking about DFI 2 strokes. But since you mentioned all marine engines, there could be a lot more old 4 strokes there as well. Just not outboards. Hmm, are you including two stroke diesels in that data? No. If you want to, go ahead. But only old marine ones. Old is a relative term. Seems as though someone as self-imposed brilliant as you would never use a term that unspecific. If you were actually smart enough to follow a thread you'd see that I am only continuing the use of term "old" as stated by (F330 GT). If you want to know what he meant by that relative term, ask him. However, your attempt at a dig has once again proven your own stupidity. Keep up the good work! Steve |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:41 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com