![]() |
OT : Poor, Poor Democrats
LOL, you calling people stupid and 3rd gradish is very annoying and 3rd
gradish. "basskisser" wrote in message om... (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:03:14 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message I'll tell you now. We had NEVER went to war against another country unprovoked, without reason, and without consent of our allies, that is, until now. cough cough vietnam cough cough LOL. He's one of yours. Steve Those LOL's are annoying, and pretty third gradish, to start. Now, about Vietnam, the reason I don't put it in the same class as this current lie-war we are in is multi-faceted, but to keep it simple, at least we had allies that were in agreement with us. |
OT : Poor, Poor Democrats
|
OT : Poor, Poor Democrats
"basskisser" wrote in message
om... (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:03:14 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message I'll tell you now. We had NEVER went to war against another country unprovoked, without reason, and without consent of our allies, that is, until now. cough cough vietnam cough cough LOL. He's one of yours. Steve Those LOL's are annoying, and pretty third gradish, to start. Now, about Vietnam, the reason I don't put it in the same class as this current lie-war we are in is multi-faceted, but to keep it simple, at least we had allies that were in agreement with us. In Vietnam??? Which allies? :-) |
OT : Poor, Poor Democrats
"basskisser" wrote in message
om... We had VERY FEW allies in Iraq, with most of the world either not wanting to get involved, or showing total disdain for us. Our allies to countries ratio for Vietnam was MUCH higher. The president-head says we have either 60 or 80 something in the "coalition". (It's hard to remember which number he used, since neither one is connected to reality). I think he means "countries which, in return for our not cutting off foreign aid, have agreed to not criticize us openly". |
OT : Poor, Poor Democrats
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:09:11 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message . com... (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:03:14 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message I'll tell you now. We had NEVER went to war against another country unprovoked, without reason, and without consent of our allies, that is, until now. cough cough vietnam cough cough LOL. He's one of yours. Steve Those LOL's are annoying, and pretty third gradish, to start. Now, about Vietnam, the reason I don't put it in the same class as this current lie-war we are in is multi-faceted, but to keep it simple, at least we had allies that were in agreement with us. In Vietnam??? Which allies? :-) There were Australians there. I had a great time at one of their compounds over a weekend. Their post exchange (a retail store) had the best camera selection in all of Vietnam. And they drank good beer! John On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD |
OT : Poor, Poor Democrats
"JohnH" wrote in message
... In Vietnam??? Which allies? :-) There were Australians there. I had a great time at one of their compounds over a weekend. Their post exchange (a retail store) had the best camera selection in all of Vietnam. And they drank good beer! John On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD Yes, the Australians. They've also quietly backed away from the domino theory, hoping nobody noticed the snake oil they bought. Regardless, I guess that's a "coalition", just like now. :-) |
OT : Poor, Poor Democrats
On 18 Dec 2003 10:26:03 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:
(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 18 Dec 2003 03:48:25 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:03:14 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message I'll tell you now. We had NEVER went to war against another country unprovoked, without reason, and without consent of our allies, that is, until now. cough cough vietnam cough cough LOL. He's one of yours. Those LOL's are annoying, and pretty third gradish, to start. Now, I would have thought you were used to people laughing at you by now. Is it about as annoying as you saying republicans shouldn't be allowed to breed? Where have we heard rhetoric like that before? Why from you, of course. And no, me saying republicans shouldn't be allowed to breed is called an OPINION, do you know what that is? Now, those LOL's serve WHAT purpose? Oh, I know, it's so even fools can make a point. If it annoys you, that's purpose enough. Your HEHHEE's don't bother me. It just shows what a lunatic you are. about Vietnam, the reason I don't put it in the same class as this current lie-war we are in is multi-faceted, but to keep it simple, at least we had allies that were in agreement with us. I see. So you're saying that Vietnam is different than Iraq because we didn't have any allies that were in agreement with us, right? Oh, you disagree? So you are saying Vietnam IS just like Iraq? There are many reasons why Vietnam is not just like Iraq. You're just too stupid to point them out. You "reason" that we didn't have any allies is just pure crap. You don't know what you're talking about AT ALL. Now I have to ask ... which one was it that we didn't have any allies that were in agreement with is? We had VERY FEW allies in Iraq, with most of the world either not wanting to get involved, or showing total disdain for us. Our allies to countries ratio for Vietnam was MUCH higher. Ah, I see. You now went from none to VERY FEW allies. Ok, why don't you list all the allies we have providing material support (men, money, whatever) in Iraq vs. all the allies we had providing material support in Vietnam. This should be interesting. Steve |
OT : Poor, Poor Democrats
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:09:11 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message . com... (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:03:14 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message I'll tell you now. We had NEVER went to war against another country unprovoked, without reason, and without consent of our allies, that is, until now. cough cough vietnam cough cough LOL. He's one of yours. Steve Those LOL's are annoying, and pretty third gradish, to start. Now, about Vietnam, the reason I don't put it in the same class as this current lie-war we are in is multi-faceted, but to keep it simple, at least we had allies that were in agreement with us. In Vietnam??? Which allies? :-) Like I said, he's one of yours. I actually feel sorry for you. His ineptness goes a long way towards discrediting anything the left says here. Steve |
OT : Poor, Poor Democrats
(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On 18 Dec 2003 10:26:03 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 18 Dec 2003 03:48:25 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:03:14 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message I'll tell you now. We had NEVER went to war against another country unprovoked, without reason, and without consent of our allies, that is, until now. cough cough vietnam cough cough LOL. He's one of yours. Those LOL's are annoying, and pretty third gradish, to start. Now, I would have thought you were used to people laughing at you by now. Is it about as annoying as you saying republicans shouldn't be allowed to breed? Where have we heard rhetoric like that before? Why from you, of course. And no, me saying republicans shouldn't be allowed to breed is called an OPINION, do you know what that is? Now, those LOL's serve WHAT purpose? Oh, I know, it's so even fools can make a point. If it annoys you, that's purpose enough. Your HEHHEE's don't bother me. It just shows what a lunatic you are. about Vietnam, the reason I don't put it in the same class as this current lie-war we are in is multi-faceted, but to keep it simple, at least we had allies that were in agreement with us. I see. So you're saying that Vietnam is different than Iraq because we didn't have any allies that were in agreement with us, right? Oh, you disagree? So you are saying Vietnam IS just like Iraq? There are many reasons why Vietnam is not just like Iraq. You're just too stupid to point them out. You "reason" that we didn't have any allies is just pure crap. You don't know what you're talking about AT ALL. Now I have to ask ... which one was it that we didn't have any allies that were in agreement with is? We had VERY FEW allies in Iraq, with most of the world either not wanting to get involved, or showing total disdain for us. Our allies to countries ratio for Vietnam was MUCH higher. Ah, I see. You now went from none to VERY FEW allies. Ok, why don't you list all the allies we have providing material support (men, money, whatever) in Iraq vs. all the allies we had providing material support in Vietnam. This should be interesting. Steve Can't do a simple search yourself? It's quite easy. This should prove interesting. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com