![]() |
|
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
By Con Coughlin (Filed: 12/14/2003) Iraq's coalition government claims that it has uncovered documentary proof that Mohammed Atta, the al-Qaeda mastermind of the September 11 attacks against the US, was trained in Baghdad by Abu Nidal, the notorious Palestinian terrorist. Details of Atta's visit to the Iraqi capital in the summer of 2001, just weeks before he launched the most devastating terrorist attack in US history, are contained in a top secret memo written to Saddam Hussein, the then Iraqi president, by Tahir Jalil Habbush al-Tikriti, the former head of the Iraqi Intelligence Service. The handwritten memo, a copy of which has been obtained exclusively by the Telegraph, is dated July 1, 2001 and provides a short resume of a three-day "work programme" Atta had undertaken at Abu Nidal's base in Baghdad. In the memo, Habbush reports that Atta "displayed extraordinary effort" and demonstrated his ability to lead the team that would be "responsible for attacking the targets that we have agreed to destroy". The second part of the memo, which is headed "Niger Shipment", contains a report about an unspecified shipment - believed to be uranium - that it says has been transported to Iraq via Libya and Syria. Although Iraqi officials refused to disclose how and where they had obtained the document, Dr Ayad Allawi, a member of Iraq's ruling seven-man Presidential Committee, said the document was genuine. "We are uncovering evidence all the time of Saddam's involvement with al-Qaeda," he said. "But this is the most compelling piece of evidence that we have found so far. It shows that not only did Saddam have contacts with al-Qaeda, he had contact with those responsible for the September 11 attacks." Although Atta is believed to have been resident in Florida in the summer of 2001, he is known to have used more than a dozen aliases, and intelligence experts believe he could easily have slipped out of the US to visit Iraq. Abu Nidal, who was responsible for the failed assassination of the Israeli ambassador to London in 1982, was based in Baghdad for more than two decades. http://makeashorterlink.com/?T25A31EC6 |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
NOYB wrote:
Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam By Con Coughlin (Filed: 12/14/2003) Iraq's coalition government claims that it has uncovered documentary proof that Mohammed Atta, the al-Qaeda mastermind of the September 11 attacks against the US, was trained in Baghdad by Abu Nidal, the notorious Palestinian terrorist. Wow! What a find! Was the ink dry on the hand-written note? -- Email sent to is never read. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
Does this link Saddam to 9/11?
(Filed: 12/14/2003) A document discovered by Iraq's interim government details a meeting between the man behind the September 11 attacks and Abu Nidal, the Palestinian terrorist, at his Baghdad training camp. Con Coughlin reports. For anyone attempting to find evidence to justify the war in Iraq, the discovery of a document that directly links Mohammed Atta, the al-Qaeda mastermind of the September 11 attacks, with the Baghdad training camp of Abu Nidal, the infamous Palestinian terrorist, appears almost too good to be true. Ever since four hijacked civilian jets devastated the United States' eastern seaboard on September 11, 2001, there have been any number of reports circulating Western intelligence agencies suggesting that Saddam Hussein's Iraq had close links to al-Qaeda. Most of the claims relate to meetings between al-Qaeda and Iraqi intelligence to discuss co-operation on matters such as funding, training and equipment. Prior to the discovery of the document published today by the Telegraph, the most controversial report related to the suggestion that Atta had met Ahmed Khalil Ibrahim Samir al-Ani, a senior Iraqi intelligence officer, in Prague in April 2001. But while both President Bush and Tony Blair have dropped numerous hints that they believe there was a significant level of co-operation between Saddam and al-Qaeda, their respective intelligence agencies have actively sought to downplay the significance of the relationship, especially the suggestion that Saddam was in any way involved in the September 11 attacks. To this end America's Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), with the backing of Britain's MI6, have poured scorn on Atta's Prague meeting. However, the tantalising detail provided in the intelligence document uncovered by Iraq's interim government suggests that Atta's involvement with Iraqi intelligence may well have been far deeper than has hitherto been acknowledged. Written in the neat, precise hand of Tahir Jalil Habbush al-Tikriti, the former head of the Iraqi Intelligence Service (IIS) and one of the few named in the US government's pack of cards of most-wanted Iraqis not to have been apprehended, the personal memo to Saddam is signed by Habbush in distinctive green ink. Headed simply "Intelligence Items", and dated July 1, 2001, it is addressed: "To the President of the Ba'ath Revolution Party and President of the Republic, may God protect you." The first paragraph states that "Mohammed Atta, an Egyptian national, came with Abu Ammer (an Arabic nom-de-guerre - his real identity is unknown) and we hosted him in Abu Nidal's house at al-Dora under our direct supervision. "We arranged a work programme for him for three days with a team dedicated to working with him . . . He displayed extraordinary effort and showed a firm commitment to lead the team which will be responsible for attacking the targets that we have agreed to destroy." There is nothing in the document that provides any clue to the identity of the "targets", although Iraqi officials say it is a coded reference to the September 11 attacks. The second item contains a report of how Iraqi intelligence, helped by "a small team from the al-Qaeda organisation", arranged for an (unspecified) shipment from Niger to reach Baghdad by way of Libya and Syria. Iraqi officials believe this is a reference to the controversial shipments of uranium ore Iraq acquired from Niger to aid Saddam in his efforts to develop an atom bomb, although there is no explicit reference in the document to this. Habbush writes that the successful completion of the shipment was "the fruit of your excellent secret meeting with Bashir al-Asad (the Syrian president) on the Iraqi-Syrian border", and concludes: "May God protect you and save you to all Arab nations." While it is almost impossible to ascertain whether or not the document is legitimate or a clever fake, Iraqi officials working for the interim government are convinced of its authenticity, even though they decline to reveal where and how they obtained it. "It is not important how we found it," said a senior Iraqi security official. "The important thing is that we did find it and the information it contains." A leading member of Iraq's governing council, who asked not to be named, said he was convinced of the document's authenticity. "There are people who are working with us who used to work with Habbush who are convinced that it is his handwriting and signature. We are uncovering evidence all the time of Saddam's dealings with al-Qaeda, and this document shows the extent of the old regime's involvement with the international terrorist network." This is the second document published by this newspaper that appears to highlight Saddam's links with al-Qaeda. Earlier this year the Telegraph published details of another Iraqi intelligence document that indicated Saddam's regime was attempting to set up a meeting with Osama bin Laden, the al-Qaeda leader, who was then based in Sudan. Intelligence experts point out that a memo such as that written by Habbush would of necessity be vague and short. "Trained intelligence officers hate putting anything down in writing," said one former CIA officer. "You never know where it might turn up." Certainly the memo's detail concerning Mohammed Atta and Abu Nidal fits in with the known movements of the two terrorists in the summer of 2001. Abu Nidal, the renegade Palestinian terrorist responsible for a wave of outrages in the 1980s, such as the 1985 bomb attacks on Rome and Vienna airports, was based in Baghdad, under Saddam's personal protection, for most of his career. Having briefly relocated to Libya, Abu Nidal returned to Baghdad at some point in early 2001. At the time it was assumed that Saddam had lured the Palestinian terrorist back to help the Iraqi leader plan a number of terrorist attacks aimed at destabilising American plans to remove him. In particular, Saddam wanted Abu Nidal to revive his network of "sleeper cells" in Europe and the Middle East to carry out a new wave of attacks. During 2001 Abu Nidal lived in a number of houses in the Baghdad area, including a spacious home in the al-Dora district where he is reported to have met Atta. The relationship between Abu Nidal and Saddam, however, quickly turned sour, mainly because - as the Telegraph reported at the time - the ageing Palestinian leader was reluctant to accede to Saddam's request to train al-Qaeda fighters in sophisticated terrorist techniques. Abu Nidal was murdered in August 2001, although the Iraqis tried to claim that he had committed suicide. Habbush appeared at a hastily arranged press conference in Baghdad in an attempt to persuade the sceptical Arab media that Abu Nidal had taken his own life after Iraqi investigators had uncovered a plot to assassinate Saddam. Although Western intelligence agencies have attempted to trace Atta's movements in the months preceding September 11, there remain several periods during which his precise whereabouts are unknown. Having moved to Florida from Hamburg in 2000, Atta is known to have made at least two trips from the US to Europe in 2001. In early January he flew to Madrid for a few days. His next confirmed trip was to Zurich in early July. In between, American investigators have concluded from a detailed examination of Atta's credit cards and phone records, that he spent most of the spring and early summer of 2001 in Florida, interspersed by occasional domestic trips. The only confirmed sighting of Atta during this period, however, was on April 26 when he was pulled over for a traffic violation in Florida. This traffic offence, taken with other evidence collated by FBI agents, is one of the reasons that CIA officials have discounted the report that Atta met an Iraqi intelligence officer in Prague earlier in the month (the Czech authorities claim Atta was in Prague on April 8). Yesterday the New York Times reported that Ani, who was taken into US custody last July, had told American interrogators that he had not met Atta in Prague. "The Prague meeting does not appear very convincing," said Lorenzo Vidino, a terrorism analyst at The Investigative Project, a non-profit organisation that investigates international terrorism, in Washington. "But even if that meeting did not take place you have to remember that Atta used a large number of aliases when he travelled. It is not inconceivable that Atta slipped out of the US undetected sometime in the first half of 2001." The US Congressional report into the September 11 attacks states that Atta used 16 to 17 known aliases, although American intelligence experts concede that there may have been others. It is entirely conceivable, then, that Atta secretly made his way to Baghdad to undertake training with Abu Nidal a few months before the September 11 attacks. But as long as Saddam and his senior intelligence operatives remain at large, it is impossible to assess just how much they knew about, and were involved in, the planning and execution of the September 11 atrocities. .Con Coughlin is the author of Saddam: The Secret Life (Macmillan) |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
NOYB wrote:
Does this link Saddam to 9/11? (Filed: 12/14/2003) A document discovered by Iraq's interim government details a meeting between the man behind the September 11 attacks and Abu Nidal, the Palestinian terrorist, at his Baghdad training camp. Con Coughlin reports. For anyone attempting to find evidence to justify the war in Iraq, the discovery of a document that directly links Mohammed Atta, the al-Qaeda mastermind of the September 11 attacks, with the Baghdad training camp of Abu Nidal, the infamous Palestinian terrorist, appears almost too good to be true. Your answer may be found in the last phrase of the sentence... "...too good to be true." Some Bush-ite from Faux News probably planted the document. -- Email sent to is never read. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: Does this link Saddam to 9/11? (Filed: 12/14/2003) A document discovered by Iraq's interim government details a meeting between the man behind the September 11 attacks and Abu Nidal, the Palestinian terrorist, at his Baghdad training camp. Con Coughlin reports. For anyone attempting to find evidence to justify the war in Iraq, the discovery of a document that directly links Mohammed Atta, the al-Qaeda mastermind of the September 11 attacks, with the Baghdad training camp of Abu Nidal, the infamous Palestinian terrorist, appears almost too good to be true. Your answer may be found in the last phrase of the sentence... "...too good to be true." Perhaps. However, what *would* it take to convince someone like yourself that there was a definitive link? Some Bush-ite from Faux News probably planted the document. Sure. That's why the reporting of such a document is nowhere to be found on Fox's website. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: Does this link Saddam to 9/11? (Filed: 12/14/2003) A document discovered by Iraq's interim government details a meeting between the man behind the September 11 attacks and Abu Nidal, the Palestinian terrorist, at his Baghdad training camp. Con Coughlin reports. Nidal is a Palestinian terrorist. Not an Iraqi terrorist. What does that tell you? What about the fact that many of the the 9-11 terrorists made Florida their home and in fact received their training there... Perhaps we should bomb the crap out of Florida. What's your address again? -- Email sent to is never read. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
I think we should use the new hi tech bombs to just blow the hell out of
every single democrat in the US, that will teach them to mess around with a republican president. We will bomb the democrats back to the stone age. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: Does this link Saddam to 9/11? (Filed: 12/14/2003) A document discovered by Iraq's interim government details a meeting between the man behind the September 11 attacks and Abu Nidal, the Palestinian terrorist, at his Baghdad training camp. Con Coughlin reports. Nidal is a Palestinian terrorist. Not an Iraqi terrorist. What does that tell you? What about the fact that many of the the 9-11 terrorists made Florida their home and in fact received their training there... Perhaps we should bomb the crap out of Florida. What's your address again? -- Email sent to is never read. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: Does this link Saddam to 9/11? (Filed: 12/14/2003) A document discovered by Iraq's interim government details a meeting between the man behind the September 11 attacks and Abu Nidal, the Palestinian terrorist, at his Baghdad training camp. Con Coughlin reports. Nidal is a Palestinian terrorist. Not an Iraqi terrorist. What does that tell you? What about the fact that many of the the 9-11 terrorists made Florida their home and in fact received their training there... Perhaps we should bomb the crap out of Florida. Florida is part of the US. You're showing your hatred for our country once again. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: Does this link Saddam to 9/11? (Filed: 12/14/2003) A document discovered by Iraq's interim government details a meeting between the man behind the September 11 attacks and Abu Nidal, the Palestinian terrorist, at his Baghdad training camp. Con Coughlin reports. Nidal is a Palestinian terrorist. Not an Iraqi terrorist. What does that tell you? What about the fact that many of the the 9-11 terrorists made Florida their home and in fact received their training there... Perhaps we should bomb the crap out of Florida. Florida is part of the US. You're showing your hatred for our country once again. I see. So it is ok to plan terrorist acts against the USA if you are *in* the USA...you can do that without fear of being invaded or bombed. Yeah, I suppose that makes sense. You never know when the next pack of native-born right-wing conservative extremists will blow up a building. -- Email sent to is never read. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:29:07 +0000, NOYB wrote:
Does this link Saddam to 9/11? (Filed: 12/14/2003) A document discovered by Iraq's interim government details a meeting between the man behind the September 11 attacks and Abu Nidal, the Palestinian terrorist, at his Baghdad training camp. Con Coughlin reports. Possibly, but I would be careful. Chalabi is on the Iraqi Council. If he had anything to do with it, it's probably garbage. Chalabi has already fed Rumsfeld considerable bad intelligence. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:29:07 +0000, NOYB wrote:
The second item contains a report of how Iraqi intelligence, helped by "a small team from the al-Qaeda organisation", arranged for an (unspecified) shipment from Niger to reach Baghdad by way of Libya and Syria. Iraqi officials believe this is a reference to the controversial shipments of uranium ore Iraq acquired from Niger to aid Saddam in his efforts to develop an atom bomb, although there is no explicit reference in the document to this. I think, at least this part, is BS. IMO uranium from Niger has been totally debunked. An interesting read: http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: Does this link Saddam to 9/11? (Filed: 12/14/2003) A document discovered by Iraq's interim government details a meeting between the man behind the September 11 attacks and Abu Nidal, the Palestinian terrorist, at his Baghdad training camp. Con Coughlin reports. For anyone attempting to find evidence to justify the war in Iraq, the discovery of a document that directly links Mohammed Atta, the al-Qaeda mastermind of the September 11 attacks, with the Baghdad training camp of Abu Nidal, the infamous Palestinian terrorist, appears almost too good to be true. Your answer may be found in the last phrase of the sentence... "...too good to be true." Perhaps. However, what *would* it take to convince someone like yourself that there was a definitive link? Some Bush-ite from Faux News probably planted the document. Sure. That's why the reporting of such a document is nowhere to be found on Fox's website. May I submit a better question is just how dangerous would it be to allow that motley bunch of extreme loons from the left to get back into power?? Harry is just an example of how they will happily bag their own country & even more happily see citizens & brave soldiers at risk if it furthers their political aims. Bush is continuing to do a good job in routing out these terrorists & as always the US & allied armed men & women are performing magnificently, with some truly sad loss of life. Again the left seem to think allied casualties are nothing more than a political opportunity for them; the average US citizen will use the ballot to meter out it's punishment to these lefty grubs in it's own good time. If nothing else Harry serves as a public insight into just how dumb & sick the left is, so ensuring Bush's second term & a much better chance that the world economy might still avoid a meltdown. Good work Harold keep those lies a comin' you sick *******. K |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
"thunder" wrote in message ... On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:29:07 +0000, NOYB wrote: The second item contains a report of how Iraqi intelligence, helped by "a small team from the al-Qaeda organisation", arranged for an (unspecified) shipment from Niger to reach Baghdad by way of Libya and Syria. Iraqi officials believe this is a reference to the controversial shipments of uranium ore Iraq acquired from Niger to aid Saddam in his efforts to develop an atom bomb, although there is no explicit reference in the document to this. I think, at least this part, is BS. IMO uranium from Niger has been totally debunked. Actually, the uranium from Niger report hasn't been totally debunked. British intelligence stands by its original story. If you remember, it was CIA employee Valerie Plame's husband, Joseph Wilson, who made the claim that he could find no evidence of the uranium transfer...and his bias is evidenced by his maxed out campaign contributions to the Democratic Party and John Kerry's campaign...and by the anti-war piece he wrote for Nation magazine in February. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:10:52 +0000, NOYB wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message ... On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:29:07 +0000, NOYB wrote: The second item contains a report of how Iraqi intelligence, helped by "a small team from the al-Qaeda organisation", arranged for an (unspecified) shipment from Niger to reach Baghdad by way of Libya and Syria. Iraqi officials believe this is a reference to the controversial shipments of uranium ore Iraq acquired from Niger to aid Saddam in his efforts to develop an atom bomb, although there is no explicit reference in the document to this. I think, at least this part, is BS. IMO uranium from Niger has been totally debunked. Actually, the uranium from Niger report hasn't been totally debunked. British intelligence stands by its original story. If you remember, it was CIA employee Valerie Plame's husband, Joseph Wilson, who made the claim that he could find no evidence of the uranium transfer...and his bias is evidenced by his maxed out campaign contributions to the Democratic Party and John Kerry's campaign...and by the anti-war piece he wrote for Nation magazine in February. Read the above. It says Iraq *acquired* uranium from Niger. There is no evidence of this. The documents that sent Wilson to Niger have been proven and accepted to be forgeries. What the British claim is that they have additional information that Iraq *sought* to buy uranium from Niger. That information is most likely from French intelligence. http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/...International/ http://www.washtimes.com/world/20030...4149-3172r.htm http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/thisw...999291,00.html And again, to put the pieces together: http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
"thunder" wrote in message ... On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:10:52 +0000, NOYB wrote: "thunder" wrote in message ... On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:29:07 +0000, NOYB wrote: The second item contains a report of how Iraqi intelligence, helped by "a small team from the al-Qaeda organisation", arranged for an (unspecified) shipment from Niger to reach Baghdad by way of Libya and Syria. Iraqi officials believe this is a reference to the controversial shipments of uranium ore Iraq acquired from Niger to aid Saddam in his efforts to develop an atom bomb, although there is no explicit reference in the document to this. I think, at least this part, is BS. IMO uranium from Niger has been totally debunked. Actually, the uranium from Niger report hasn't been totally debunked. British intelligence stands by its original story. If you remember, it was CIA employee Valerie Plame's husband, Joseph Wilson, who made the claim that he could find no evidence of the uranium transfer...and his bias is evidenced by his maxed out campaign contributions to the Democratic Party and John Kerry's campaign...and by the anti-war piece he wrote for Nation magazine in February. Read the above. It says Iraq *acquired* uranium from Niger. No it doesn't. It talks of an "unspecified" shipment from Niger to Baghdad...which was shipped with the help of al qaeda via Lybia and Syria. There is no evidence of this. The documents that sent Wilson to Niger have been proven and accepted to be forgeries. What the British claim is that they have additional information that Iraq *sought* to buy uranium from Niger. That information is most likely from French intelligence. http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/...e0308/BNPrint/ International/ http://www.washtimes.com/world/20030...4149-3172r.htm http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/thisw...999291,00.html And again, to put the pieces together: http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 15:47:16 +0000, NOYB wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message ... On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:10:52 +0000, NOYB wrote: "thunder" wrote in message ... On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:29:07 +0000, NOYB wrote: The second item contains a report of how Iraqi intelligence, helped by "a small team from the al-Qaeda organisation", arranged for an (unspecified) shipment from Niger to reach Baghdad by way of Libya and Syria. Iraqi officials believe this is a reference to the controversial shipments of uranium ore Iraq acquired from Niger to aid Saddam in his efforts to develop an atom bomb, although there is no explicit reference in the document to this. I think, at least this part, is BS. IMO uranium from Niger has been totally debunked. Actually, the uranium from Niger report hasn't been totally debunked. British intelligence stands by its original story. If you remember, it was CIA employee Valerie Plame's husband, Joseph Wilson, who made the claim that he could find no evidence of the uranium transfer...and his bias is evidenced by his maxed out campaign contributions to the Democratic Party and John Kerry's campaign...and by the anti-war piece he wrote for Nation magazine in February. Read the above. It says Iraq *acquired* uranium from Niger. No it doesn't. It talks of an "unspecified" shipment from Niger to Baghdad...which was shipped with the help of al qaeda via Lybia and Syria. Huh? "Iraqi officials believe this is a reference to the controversial shipments of uranium ore Iraq acquired from Niger to aid Saddam in his efforts to develop an atom bomb, although there is no explicit reference in the document to this." |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
"thunder" wrote in message ... On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 15:47:16 +0000, NOYB wrote: "thunder" wrote in message ... On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:10:52 +0000, NOYB wrote: "thunder" wrote in message ... On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:29:07 +0000, NOYB wrote: The second item contains a report of how Iraqi intelligence, helped by "a small team from the al-Qaeda organisation", arranged for an (unspecified) shipment from Niger to reach Baghdad by way of Libya and Syria. Iraqi officials believe this is a reference to the controversial shipments of uranium ore Iraq acquired from Niger to aid Saddam in his efforts to develop an atom bomb, although there is no explicit reference in the document to this. I think, at least this part, is BS. IMO uranium from Niger has been totally debunked. Actually, the uranium from Niger report hasn't been totally debunked. British intelligence stands by its original story. If you remember, it was CIA employee Valerie Plame's husband, Joseph Wilson, who made the claim that he could find no evidence of the uranium transfer...and his bias is evidenced by his maxed out campaign contributions to the Democratic Party and John Kerry's campaign...and by the anti-war piece he wrote for Nation magazine in February. Read the above. It says Iraq *acquired* uranium from Niger. No it doesn't. It talks of an "unspecified" shipment from Niger to Baghdad...which was shipped with the help of al qaeda via Lybia and Syria. Huh? "Iraqi officials believe this is a reference to the controversial shipments of uranium ore Iraq acquired from Niger to aid Saddam in his efforts to develop an atom bomb, although there is no explicit reference in the document to this."' The memo cited in the news report talks of an "unspecified" shipment. The news report itself says "Iraqi officials believe this is reference to the controversial shipments of uranium". The original Italian document proved to be forgery...but MI6 stands by their intel that said that Iraq indeed did seek uranium. I feel you just can't say for sure that an attempt to purchase uranium never took place. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
"NOYB" wrote in message
... Nidal is a Palestinian terrorist. Not an Iraqi terrorist. What does that tell you? What about the fact that many of the the 9-11 terrorists made Florida their home and in fact received their training there... Perhaps we should bomb the crap out of Florida. Florida is part of the US. You're showing your hatred for our country once again. No, Einstein. He's pointing out that a terrorists place of training does not automatically assign guilt to that country. If the world ran according to your logic, then the U.S.A. would be guilty of harboring terrorists. After all, they *did* learn to fly those planes at flight schools here, not abroad. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message news:3knDb.12069 No, Einstein. He's pointing out that a terrorists place of training does not automatically assign guilt to that country. If the world ran according to your logic, then the U.S.A. would be guilty of harboring terrorists. After all, they *did* learn to fly those planes at flight schools here, not abroad. There's a world of difference between sending people to a flight school as innocuous individuals under false pretenses, and setting up a paramilitary training camp with the express approval and financial support of the host country. You do see that, don't you? |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
"John Gaquin" wrote in message
... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message news:3knDb.12069 No, Einstein. He's pointing out that a terrorists place of training does not automatically assign guilt to that country. If the world ran according to your logic, then the U.S.A. would be guilty of harboring terrorists. After all, they *did* learn to fly those planes at flight schools here, not abroad. There's a world of difference between sending people to a flight school as innocuous individuals under false pretenses, and setting up a paramilitary training camp with the express approval and financial support of the host country. You do see that, don't you? Yes. And a meeting between two people in Baghdad doesn't necessarily constitute a training camp. Or, if it does, then the same thing applies to a Muslim house of worship in New Jersey, in which case the port authority may be liable for helping terrorists get from Manhattan to Jersey City repeatedly. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message news:vgpDb.12073 Yes. And a meeting between two people in Baghdad doesn't necessarily constitute a training camp. Or, if it does, then the same thing applies to a Muslim house of worship in New Jersey, in which case the port authority may be liable for helping terrorists get from Manhattan to Jersey City repeatedly. Your point carries in principle, but suffers under realistic examination. The fact is that because of the way our country operates, with open borders, etc., just about anyone can come to school here (flight or otherwise), or come visit a house of worship, without knowledge of the government -- at least not immediate or timely knowledge. But the reverse is not true. No one - no one at all - gets into a mid-eastern country, particularly one of the ilk of Iraq, Iran, Syria, SA, without the police agencies being precisely aware of the who, where, and why of your visit. To schedule or attend a meeting with a government official would increase your 'attention quotient' in spades. There could be no such thing as a casual meeting in Baghdad involving either a known terrorist or a government official without security agency knowledge and consent. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
"John Gaquin" wrote in message
... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message news:vgpDb.12073 Yes. And a meeting between two people in Baghdad doesn't necessarily constitute a training camp. Or, if it does, then the same thing applies to a Muslim house of worship in New Jersey, in which case the port authority may be liable for helping terrorists get from Manhattan to Jersey City repeatedly. Your point carries in principle, but suffers under realistic examination. The fact is that because of the way our country operates, with open borders, etc., just about anyone can come to school here (flight or otherwise), or come visit a house of worship, without knowledge of the government -- at least not immediate or timely knowledge. But the reverse is not true. No one - no one at all - gets into a mid-eastern country, particularly one of the ilk of Iraq, Iran, Syria, SA, without the police agencies being precisely aware of the who, where, and why of your visit. To schedule or attend a meeting with a government official would increase your 'attention quotient' in spades. There could be no such thing as a casual meeting in Baghdad involving either a known terrorist or a government official without security agency knowledge and consent. OK. Where did they meet in Baghdad? |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
John Gaquin wrote:
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message news:3knDb.12069 No, Einstein. He's pointing out that a terrorists place of training does not automatically assign guilt to that country. If the world ran according to your logic, then the U.S.A. would be guilty of harboring terrorists. After all, they *did* learn to fly those planes at flight schools here, not abroad. There's a world of difference between sending people to a flight school as innocuous individuals under false pretenses, and setting up a paramilitary training camp with the express approval and financial support of the host country. You do see that, don't you? Indeed, we set up lots of military training camps with the approval and support of our government. It's OK when we do it, but not when others do it? Did those paramilitary units invade the United States and take over our major cities? Did our military units invade other countries and take over their major cities? -- Email sent to is never read. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "John Gaquin" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message news:3knDb.12069 No, Einstein. He's pointing out that a terrorists place of training does not automatically assign guilt to that country. If the world ran according to your logic, then the U.S.A. would be guilty of harboring terrorists. After all, they *did* learn to fly those planes at flight schools here, not abroad. There's a world of difference between sending people to a flight school as innocuous individuals under false pretenses, and setting up a paramilitary training camp with the express approval and financial support of the host country. You do see that, don't you? Yes. And a meeting between two people in Baghdad doesn't necessarily constitute a training camp. Doug, The Iraqi gov't issued sanctuary to Abu Nidal. He wasn't living there clandestinely. If he was meeting with al Qaeda, it was with the full knowledge of Saddam. All of those issues makes that situation a far cry from two terrorists meeting in New Jersey. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
Probably in the same apartment in which Abu Nidal was gunned down in shortly
thereafter. "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "John Gaquin" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message news:vgpDb.12073 Yes. And a meeting between two people in Baghdad doesn't necessarily constitute a training camp. Or, if it does, then the same thing applies to a Muslim house of worship in New Jersey, in which case the port authority may be liable for helping terrorists get from Manhattan to Jersey City repeatedly. Your point carries in principle, but suffers under realistic examination. The fact is that because of the way our country operates, with open borders, etc., just about anyone can come to school here (flight or otherwise), or come visit a house of worship, without knowledge of the government -- at least not immediate or timely knowledge. But the reverse is not true. No one - no one at all - gets into a mid-eastern country, particularly one of the ilk of Iraq, Iran, Syria, SA, without the police agencies being precisely aware of the who, where, and why of your visit. To schedule or attend a meeting with a government official would increase your 'attention quotient' in spades. There could be no such thing as a casual meeting in Baghdad involving either a known terrorist or a government official without security agency knowledge and consent. OK. Where did they meet in Baghdad? |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message news:LIpDb.12075 OK. Where did they meet in Baghdad? I have no idea where they met, and the where is beside the point. My point was that it could not have been a "casual" meeting. It could not have occurred without knowledge and consent of the Iraqi security forces. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
"John Gaquin" wrote in message
... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message news:LIpDb.12075 OK. Where did they meet in Baghdad? I have no idea where they met, and the where is beside the point. My point was that it could not have been a "casual" meeting. It could not have occurred without knowledge and consent of the Iraqi security forces. That's quite an "absolute". I'm sure Iraq was (and will again become) an Orwellian nightmare, but when WE have chosen to watch someone, we're capable of creating the same situation for that person. Still, it's not foolproof, and various attacks have shown. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
... "John Gaquin" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message news:LIpDb.12075 OK. Where did they meet in Baghdad? I have no idea where they met, and the where is beside the point. My point was that it could not have been a "casual" meeting. It could not have occurred without knowledge and consent of the Iraqi security forces. That's quite an "absolute". I'm sure Iraq was (and will again become) an Orwellian nightmare, but when WE have chosen to watch someone, we're capable of creating the same situation for that person. Still, it's not foolproof, and various attacks have shown. Oops. "AS various attacks...." |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
"Jack Meholf" wrote in message news:V04Db.540493$HS4.4112918@attbi_s01...
I think we should use the new hi tech bombs to just blow the hell out of every single democrat in the US, that will teach them to mess around with a republican president. We will bomb the democrats back to the stone age. There you go, proof that republicans shouldn't breed. Spoken like a true dolt. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
"NOYB" wrote in message news:JVtDb.79121$%
Doug, The Iraqi gov't issued sanctuary to Abu Nidal. He wasn't living there clandestinely. If he was meeting with al Qaeda, it was with the full knowledge of Saddam. All of those issues makes that situation a far cry from two terrorists meeting in New Jersey. You sound like Rush/Bush. IF, PERHAPS, etc. Just about as much substance and truth to your statements as Bush saying his people KNOW there are WMD's, etc. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
"NOYB" wrote in message ...
Probably in the same apartment in which Abu Nidal was gunned down in shortly thereafter. More pure speculation. But then again, you republicans don't mind going into a country, unprovoked, and blowing it to hell, along with innocent men, women and children, all based on nothing more than wild speculation. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
I think with you we should just castrate you. It might teach the other
idiots to behave. "basskisser" wrote in message om... "Jack Meholf" wrote in message news:V04Db.540493$HS4.4112918@attbi_s01... I think we should use the new hi tech bombs to just blow the hell out of every single democrat in the US, that will teach them to mess around with a republican president. We will bomb the democrats back to the stone age. There you go, proof that republicans shouldn't breed. Spoken like a true dolt. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
Jack Meholf wrote:
I think with you we should just castrate you. It might teach the other idiots to behave. Oh, come on, Jim. You haven't the balls to castrate a sugar-plum fairy. -- Email sent to is never read. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
Sure I do, I would even castrate a fairy like yourself. ; )
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Jack Meholf wrote: I think with you we should just castrate you. It might teach the other idiots to behave. Oh, come on, Jim. You haven't the balls to castrate a sugar-plum fairy. -- Email sent to is never read. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
"Jack Meholf" wrote in message news:OMhEb.585039$Tr4.1560563@attbi_s03...
I think with you we should just castrate you. It might teach the other idiots to behave. "basskisser" wrote in message om... "Jack Meholf" wrote in message news:V04Db.540493$HS4.4112918@attbi_s01... I think we should use the new hi tech bombs to just blow the hell out of every single democrat in the US, that will teach them to mess around with a republican president. We will bomb the democrats back to the stone age. There you go, proof that republicans shouldn't breed. Spoken like a true dolt. Jack, I've told you before. I'm in your area. Time and place, please, then you may try to castrate me. Be a man, Jack. If you think you can do something like that to me, tell me where you are. You can email me. Then, we'll post the results to the newgroup. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
Isn't Usenet just great, you can puff up and look all tough for everyone.
Will you break my pencil neck for me? "basskisser" wrote in message om... "Jack Meholf" wrote in message news:OMhEb.585039$Tr4.1560563@attbi_s03... I think with you we should just castrate you. It might teach the other idiots to behave. "basskisser" wrote in message om... "Jack Meholf" wrote in message news:V04Db.540493$HS4.4112918@attbi_s01... I think we should use the new hi tech bombs to just blow the hell out of every single democrat in the US, that will teach them to mess around with a republican president. We will bomb the democrats back to the stone age. There you go, proof that republicans shouldn't breed. Spoken like a true dolt. Jack, I've told you before. I'm in your area. Time and place, please, then you may try to castrate me. Be a man, Jack. If you think you can do something like that to me, tell me where you are. You can email me. Then, we'll post the results to the newgroup. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
Jack Meholf wrote:
Isn't Usenet just great, you can puff up and look all tough for everyone. Will you break my pencil neck for me? So, Gallow, how much did you get for that wakeboard boat? -- Email sent to is never read. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
Are you going to break my neck too? Wow, all the kind hearted individuals
are busy high fiveing each other. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Jack Meholf wrote: Isn't Usenet just great, you can puff up and look all tough for everyone. Will you break my pencil neck for me? So, Gallow, how much did you get for that wakeboard boat? -- Email sent to is never read. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
Jack Meholf wrote:
Are you going to break my neck too? Wow, all the kind hearted individuals are busy high fiveing each other. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Jack Meholf wrote: Isn't Usenet just great, you can puff up and look all tough for everyone. Will you break my pencil neck for me? So, Gallow, how much did you get for that wakeboard boat? -- Email sent to is never read. Nope. I just want to know how much you got for the wakeboard boat, Gallow. Oh...and that your son is doing well in college. -- Email sent to is never read. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
Subject: OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
From: "Jack Meholf" Date: 12/19/03 3:48 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: l7MEb.599772$Tr4.1568003@attbi_s03 Are you going to break my neck too? Wow, all the kind hearted individuals are busy high fiveing each other. why don't you just take him up on it? chris |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:33 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com