![]() |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:29:07 +0000, NOYB wrote:
The second item contains a report of how Iraqi intelligence, helped by "a small team from the al-Qaeda organisation", arranged for an (unspecified) shipment from Niger to reach Baghdad by way of Libya and Syria. Iraqi officials believe this is a reference to the controversial shipments of uranium ore Iraq acquired from Niger to aid Saddam in his efforts to develop an atom bomb, although there is no explicit reference in the document to this. I think, at least this part, is BS. IMO uranium from Niger has been totally debunked. An interesting read: http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: Does this link Saddam to 9/11? (Filed: 12/14/2003) A document discovered by Iraq's interim government details a meeting between the man behind the September 11 attacks and Abu Nidal, the Palestinian terrorist, at his Baghdad training camp. Con Coughlin reports. For anyone attempting to find evidence to justify the war in Iraq, the discovery of a document that directly links Mohammed Atta, the al-Qaeda mastermind of the September 11 attacks, with the Baghdad training camp of Abu Nidal, the infamous Palestinian terrorist, appears almost too good to be true. Your answer may be found in the last phrase of the sentence... "...too good to be true." Perhaps. However, what *would* it take to convince someone like yourself that there was a definitive link? Some Bush-ite from Faux News probably planted the document. Sure. That's why the reporting of such a document is nowhere to be found on Fox's website. May I submit a better question is just how dangerous would it be to allow that motley bunch of extreme loons from the left to get back into power?? Harry is just an example of how they will happily bag their own country & even more happily see citizens & brave soldiers at risk if it furthers their political aims. Bush is continuing to do a good job in routing out these terrorists & as always the US & allied armed men & women are performing magnificently, with some truly sad loss of life. Again the left seem to think allied casualties are nothing more than a political opportunity for them; the average US citizen will use the ballot to meter out it's punishment to these lefty grubs in it's own good time. If nothing else Harry serves as a public insight into just how dumb & sick the left is, so ensuring Bush's second term & a much better chance that the world economy might still avoid a meltdown. Good work Harold keep those lies a comin' you sick *******. K |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
"thunder" wrote in message ... On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:29:07 +0000, NOYB wrote: The second item contains a report of how Iraqi intelligence, helped by "a small team from the al-Qaeda organisation", arranged for an (unspecified) shipment from Niger to reach Baghdad by way of Libya and Syria. Iraqi officials believe this is a reference to the controversial shipments of uranium ore Iraq acquired from Niger to aid Saddam in his efforts to develop an atom bomb, although there is no explicit reference in the document to this. I think, at least this part, is BS. IMO uranium from Niger has been totally debunked. Actually, the uranium from Niger report hasn't been totally debunked. British intelligence stands by its original story. If you remember, it was CIA employee Valerie Plame's husband, Joseph Wilson, who made the claim that he could find no evidence of the uranium transfer...and his bias is evidenced by his maxed out campaign contributions to the Democratic Party and John Kerry's campaign...and by the anti-war piece he wrote for Nation magazine in February. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:10:52 +0000, NOYB wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message ... On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:29:07 +0000, NOYB wrote: The second item contains a report of how Iraqi intelligence, helped by "a small team from the al-Qaeda organisation", arranged for an (unspecified) shipment from Niger to reach Baghdad by way of Libya and Syria. Iraqi officials believe this is a reference to the controversial shipments of uranium ore Iraq acquired from Niger to aid Saddam in his efforts to develop an atom bomb, although there is no explicit reference in the document to this. I think, at least this part, is BS. IMO uranium from Niger has been totally debunked. Actually, the uranium from Niger report hasn't been totally debunked. British intelligence stands by its original story. If you remember, it was CIA employee Valerie Plame's husband, Joseph Wilson, who made the claim that he could find no evidence of the uranium transfer...and his bias is evidenced by his maxed out campaign contributions to the Democratic Party and John Kerry's campaign...and by the anti-war piece he wrote for Nation magazine in February. Read the above. It says Iraq *acquired* uranium from Niger. There is no evidence of this. The documents that sent Wilson to Niger have been proven and accepted to be forgeries. What the British claim is that they have additional information that Iraq *sought* to buy uranium from Niger. That information is most likely from French intelligence. http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/...International/ http://www.washtimes.com/world/20030...4149-3172r.htm http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/thisw...999291,00.html And again, to put the pieces together: http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
"thunder" wrote in message ... On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:10:52 +0000, NOYB wrote: "thunder" wrote in message ... On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:29:07 +0000, NOYB wrote: The second item contains a report of how Iraqi intelligence, helped by "a small team from the al-Qaeda organisation", arranged for an (unspecified) shipment from Niger to reach Baghdad by way of Libya and Syria. Iraqi officials believe this is a reference to the controversial shipments of uranium ore Iraq acquired from Niger to aid Saddam in his efforts to develop an atom bomb, although there is no explicit reference in the document to this. I think, at least this part, is BS. IMO uranium from Niger has been totally debunked. Actually, the uranium from Niger report hasn't been totally debunked. British intelligence stands by its original story. If you remember, it was CIA employee Valerie Plame's husband, Joseph Wilson, who made the claim that he could find no evidence of the uranium transfer...and his bias is evidenced by his maxed out campaign contributions to the Democratic Party and John Kerry's campaign...and by the anti-war piece he wrote for Nation magazine in February. Read the above. It says Iraq *acquired* uranium from Niger. No it doesn't. It talks of an "unspecified" shipment from Niger to Baghdad...which was shipped with the help of al qaeda via Lybia and Syria. There is no evidence of this. The documents that sent Wilson to Niger have been proven and accepted to be forgeries. What the British claim is that they have additional information that Iraq *sought* to buy uranium from Niger. That information is most likely from French intelligence. http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/...e0308/BNPrint/ International/ http://www.washtimes.com/world/20030...4149-3172r.htm http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/thisw...999291,00.html And again, to put the pieces together: http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 15:47:16 +0000, NOYB wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message ... On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:10:52 +0000, NOYB wrote: "thunder" wrote in message ... On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:29:07 +0000, NOYB wrote: The second item contains a report of how Iraqi intelligence, helped by "a small team from the al-Qaeda organisation", arranged for an (unspecified) shipment from Niger to reach Baghdad by way of Libya and Syria. Iraqi officials believe this is a reference to the controversial shipments of uranium ore Iraq acquired from Niger to aid Saddam in his efforts to develop an atom bomb, although there is no explicit reference in the document to this. I think, at least this part, is BS. IMO uranium from Niger has been totally debunked. Actually, the uranium from Niger report hasn't been totally debunked. British intelligence stands by its original story. If you remember, it was CIA employee Valerie Plame's husband, Joseph Wilson, who made the claim that he could find no evidence of the uranium transfer...and his bias is evidenced by his maxed out campaign contributions to the Democratic Party and John Kerry's campaign...and by the anti-war piece he wrote for Nation magazine in February. Read the above. It says Iraq *acquired* uranium from Niger. No it doesn't. It talks of an "unspecified" shipment from Niger to Baghdad...which was shipped with the help of al qaeda via Lybia and Syria. Huh? "Iraqi officials believe this is a reference to the controversial shipments of uranium ore Iraq acquired from Niger to aid Saddam in his efforts to develop an atom bomb, although there is no explicit reference in the document to this." |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
"thunder" wrote in message ... On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 15:47:16 +0000, NOYB wrote: "thunder" wrote in message ... On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:10:52 +0000, NOYB wrote: "thunder" wrote in message ... On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:29:07 +0000, NOYB wrote: The second item contains a report of how Iraqi intelligence, helped by "a small team from the al-Qaeda organisation", arranged for an (unspecified) shipment from Niger to reach Baghdad by way of Libya and Syria. Iraqi officials believe this is a reference to the controversial shipments of uranium ore Iraq acquired from Niger to aid Saddam in his efforts to develop an atom bomb, although there is no explicit reference in the document to this. I think, at least this part, is BS. IMO uranium from Niger has been totally debunked. Actually, the uranium from Niger report hasn't been totally debunked. British intelligence stands by its original story. If you remember, it was CIA employee Valerie Plame's husband, Joseph Wilson, who made the claim that he could find no evidence of the uranium transfer...and his bias is evidenced by his maxed out campaign contributions to the Democratic Party and John Kerry's campaign...and by the anti-war piece he wrote for Nation magazine in February. Read the above. It says Iraq *acquired* uranium from Niger. No it doesn't. It talks of an "unspecified" shipment from Niger to Baghdad...which was shipped with the help of al qaeda via Lybia and Syria. Huh? "Iraqi officials believe this is a reference to the controversial shipments of uranium ore Iraq acquired from Niger to aid Saddam in his efforts to develop an atom bomb, although there is no explicit reference in the document to this."' The memo cited in the news report talks of an "unspecified" shipment. The news report itself says "Iraqi officials believe this is reference to the controversial shipments of uranium". The original Italian document proved to be forgery...but MI6 stands by their intel that said that Iraq indeed did seek uranium. I feel you just can't say for sure that an attempt to purchase uranium never took place. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
"NOYB" wrote in message
... Nidal is a Palestinian terrorist. Not an Iraqi terrorist. What does that tell you? What about the fact that many of the the 9-11 terrorists made Florida their home and in fact received their training there... Perhaps we should bomb the crap out of Florida. Florida is part of the US. You're showing your hatred for our country once again. No, Einstein. He's pointing out that a terrorists place of training does not automatically assign guilt to that country. If the world ran according to your logic, then the U.S.A. would be guilty of harboring terrorists. After all, they *did* learn to fly those planes at flight schools here, not abroad. |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message news:3knDb.12069 No, Einstein. He's pointing out that a terrorists place of training does not automatically assign guilt to that country. If the world ran according to your logic, then the U.S.A. would be guilty of harboring terrorists. After all, they *did* learn to fly those planes at flight schools here, not abroad. There's a world of difference between sending people to a flight school as innocuous individuals under false pretenses, and setting up a paramilitary training camp with the express approval and financial support of the host country. You do see that, don't you? |
OT--Terrorist behind September 11 strike was trained by Saddam
"John Gaquin" wrote in message
... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message news:3knDb.12069 No, Einstein. He's pointing out that a terrorists place of training does not automatically assign guilt to that country. If the world ran according to your logic, then the U.S.A. would be guilty of harboring terrorists. After all, they *did* learn to fly those planes at flight schools here, not abroad. There's a world of difference between sending people to a flight school as innocuous individuals under false pretenses, and setting up a paramilitary training camp with the express approval and financial support of the host country. You do see that, don't you? Yes. And a meeting between two people in Baghdad doesn't necessarily constitute a training camp. Or, if it does, then the same thing applies to a Muslim house of worship in New Jersey, in which case the port authority may be liable for helping terrorists get from Manhattan to Jersey City repeatedly. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com