Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Gould 0738
 
Posts: n/a
Default

How quickly the tide has turned. The gloves are off...and Cheney is winning
this one. :-)


Posted 23 minutes into the debate?

You rather obviously watched only long enough to justify your preconceived
fantasy outcome.
  #12   Report Post  
Harry Krause
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gould 0738 wrote:
How quickly the tide has turned. The gloves are off...and Cheney is winning
this one. :-)


Posted 23 minutes into the debate?

You rather obviously watched only long enough to justify your preconceived
fantasy outcome.



I think Cheney did a fine job of appealing to the GOP base, that Edwards
did what he was supposed to do (push Kerry's positions, which include
reiterating Bush's failures), and that in the end, Edwards did more to
sway independents than Cheney.

--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?
  #13   Report Post  
JR NORTH
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yeah- did you see Edwards squirm when Cheney pointed out his pathetic
Senate attendance record, and and said as VP he was in the Senate most
every Tuesday for four years, and the debate stage was the first time he
had ever met Edwards in person-What a laugh
JR

NOYB wrote:

How quickly the tide has turned. The gloves are off...and Cheney is winning
this one. :-)


  #14   Report Post  
Gould 0738
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I think Cheney did a fine job of appealing to the GOP base, t

I would agree.

The sitting VP is more presidential than the sitting POTUS.

I disagree vehemently with Cheney, but he's no slouch in a debate.
  #15   Report Post  
Gould 0738
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yeah- did you see Edwards squirm when Cheney pointed out his pathetic
Senate attendance record, and and said as VP he was in the Senate most
every Tuesday for four years, and the debate stage was the first time he
had ever met Edwards in person-What a laugh
JR


Funnier yet are the many millions of people who will fail to grasp the
following
nuance':

Dick Cheney did not say that John Edwards has never been in the Senate on a
Tuesday, just that he had never personally met him there. I doubt the VP seeks
out the company of freshman senator, and access to the VP is probably pretty
controlled.


  #16   Report Post  
Gary Warner
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Sounded to me as if Cheney forgot his president's name...how many times
did Cheney actually say the name Bush or phrase President Bush.


Harry, I agree usually with your politics and like the wit and knowledge
with which you sometimes/often write your posts here. But it's sad that
you (probably) won't admit that Cheney did a much better job tonight
than Edwards did. It undermines your intellectual-honesty/credibility.



  #17   Report Post  
John Gaquin
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Gary Warner" wrote in message

. But it's sad that
you (probably) won't admit ..... It undermines your

intellectual-honesty/credibility.


What's to undermine? Degrade something that doesn't exist?


  #18   Report Post  
basskisser
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"NOYB" wrote in message ...
How quickly the tide has turned. The gloves are off...and Cheney is winning
this one. :-)


Apparently you've ran your mouth before the results were in. Clearly, a toss up.
  #19   Report Post  
basskisser
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"NOYB" wrote in message ...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
He obfuscated the entire discussion about the
Bush Administation's lies and mistakes.


Pretty good, eh? ;-)


That's almost an admission on your part! I'm certainly glad that at
least some of the right realizes that BushCo is nothing short of a
bunch of liars.
  #20   Report Post  
Harry Krause
 
Posts: n/a
Default

basskisser wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message ...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
He obfuscated the entire discussion about the
Bush Administation's lies and mistakes.


Pretty good, eh? ;-)


That's almost an admission on your part! I'm certainly glad that at
least some of the right realizes that BushCo is nothing short of a
bunch of liars.



Nobby's been pretty straight about admitting his "side" lies through its
teeth to make its agenda palatable.

--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT Kerry and Edwards indirectly endorse President Bush Bart Senior ASA 1 August 3rd 04 08:15 AM
OT BushCo lies about John Edwards basskisser General 52 August 2nd 04 07:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017